Post your R5 Images Here

GBH nabbing a little fish. Along with a bunch of grass.

DB-Fotografie wrote in post #19286746
Went out with my new RF 100-500 and luckily there were some ducks.. So I was able to get an idea of its sharpness.. and.. WOW.

This thing is very very sharp.. almost super tele like... It smokes the EF 100-400 (which was already very very good) and there is no way a RF 600 or 800mm f/11 will come close to that IQ. So much fine detail, micro contrast.. I'm very! impressed.

Here is a duck portrait + a 100% crop.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2mtw​EeW
Ente by Daniel, on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com​/gp/generalstussner/6D​HiF1
Duck by Daniel, on Flickr

Simply stunning.

yes, the colors are real (injected thru the stem after being cut and allowed to dry out a bit)

I borrowed an EF 8-15/4 fisheye from a friend, I like the lens.

Couple shots from Dlectricity in Detroit last night. These are hand held. I should have used a monopod to get sharper shots in low light.

Mute swan

Photo from Weja's gallery.

House Finch...

Just a honeybee...

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2muG​YgV

Honigbiene "Polly"

Lubos-PM wrote in post #19287814
I borrowed an EF 8-15/4 fisheye from a friend, I like the lens.

Hosted photo: posted by Lubos-PM in
./showthread.php?p=192​87814&i=i21969326
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by Lubos-PM in
./showthread.php?p=192​87814&i=i3834161
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Beautiful photos Lubos-I like the vision that the 15mm FL gives and your compositions make great use of the leading lines that 15mm can give.
BTW-- I've been using the old school 15mm f2.8 since 2014--this FL can be very addictive.
Thanks for sharing these 2 great photo's.
Rich

Too early for the Pied-billed Grebe to get up apparently.

IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …51521186695/in/​datetaken/

Pied-billed Grebe

A few from the weekend

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2muK​uu9

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2muP​aKr

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2muU​iib

John Sheehy wrote in post #19287661
When I clicked on the eyeglasses for the "100% crop", and then clicked on 100% pixel view, and then chose "inspect" from the browser's menus, it showed an image about 1000 pixels wide. That's what I was looking at, as I assumed that when you wrote "100%" you meant 100%, here, on this website. So, perhaps flickr had the 100% crop, but one never appeared here. To post a 100% crop here, it has to be less than 1600 pixels wide, AFAIK.

When I viewed the 100% crop here on this website, it looked "too sharp", as if it was not original pixels, but had been downsampled, possibly with Nearest Neighbor.

Ah okay, that explains it. Didnt know there is a 1600px limit here, thought you can see it in original size @ flickr.

Here is the Link to the crop: https://live.staticfli​ckr.com …6534127_ae8305d​cfb_3k.jpg

A deer in the field..

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2muV​VGL