digital paradise wrote in post #19360995
These are even smaller and faster and they tease you after a while by flying past year head. I tried but when they came close ands swooped away the R5 couldn't keep up. Maybe the R3.
The more erratic the motion of a subject, the larger the angle of view needs to be, relative to subject size, to track it successfully. While we typically go for narrow angles of view for small/distant subjects, that is also counterproductive for tracking the erratic subject, so what is really needed, ideally, is very sharp, fast, shorter lenses with a very high MP sensor, and an AF that can quickly identify something like a swallow when it is small in the frame. We have a way to go before all of those conditions are met, so for now, we have to track with tunnel-vision, unless we want to rely on things like red-dot sights, but then we don't get real time feedback on focus success if we are looking at the red dot.