Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 01 Sep 2020 (Tuesday) 17:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Ring Light Problem/Question...

 
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,924 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2268
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
Post edited over 3 years ago by windpig.
     
Sep 01, 2020 19:04 |  #16

I'd be doing this.
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=19114543

No need for modeling light with a flat light set up.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,462 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4548
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 3 years ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all)
     
Sep 01, 2020 19:46 |  #17

windpig wrote in post #19118516 (external link)
I'd be doing this.
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=19114543

No need for modeling light with a flat light set up.

I believe the OP really wants to control lighting somewhat via seeing BEFORE exposure, so the 'constant' source allows one to see via the viewfinder how subject details are portrayed. Classically this was accomplished via modelling lights, while the flashtube provided sufficient level of illumination for exposure. The recommendation about LED ring light came with the understanding that the constant light of the LED assist with preview of the subject.

Simply putting an electronic flash on a translucent panel provides no ability to preview the effect of lighting on the coins he wants to show off to best advantage. Overhead lighting is flat...on the other hand, a ring ligh is not much different in that regard!...preview capability or not! IOW the recommendation really improved nothing with regard to lighting the coin. That the LED is 'constant light' makes it easier to focus when in dark ambient conditions, so it is not without benefit.

My prior responses merely dealt with the technical...the lines shown on the LCD. This post addresses the inadequacies of ring light for showing off surface detail and texture.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,924 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2268
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Sep 01, 2020 20:10 |  #18

I know what you're saying Wilt, but still, I think taking pictures of coins with flat light (using his words) is pretty simple using the set up with the diffuser and a flash. Plus he'll have the ability to use low ISO and smaller aperture. Plus the set up and shooting is simple.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RicoTudor
Senior Member
Avatar
677 posts
Likes: 386
Joined Jul 2014
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Sep 01, 2020 21:16 |  #19

Pete E wrote in post #19118478 (external link)
I am basically trying to produce flat evenly lit almost shadowless pictures of an object, with no artistic licence allowed...if I can get to grips with this, I may venture into using flash for my own pictures of these items, but that will be a bit further down the road.

As mentioned by windpig, you don't need modelling lights or continuous ring lights if the lighting is to be flat and shadowless. Shadowless is synonymous with directionless, and for that you want to use a room-sized bounce from a flash or strobe. The room should be all-around white or off-white, while the lighting instrument can be a single $20 manual flash off eBay. No further lights or modifiers are needed.

IMAGE: http://makino.fi/rico/nikon/misc/art100.jpg

I shot a heap of such objects for an art catalog in assembly-line fashion with no exposure adjustments at all.

Canon, Nikon, Contax, Leica, Sony, Profoto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete ­ E
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Sep 2020
     
Sep 02, 2020 02:29 |  #20

joeseph wrote in post #19118511 (external link)
Would it be possible to tether the 50D to a laptop & see if the problem exists viewing on a different screen? A bit more set-up involved but a lot of photography is done this way

Definitely an idea to try and one I had considered but not got around to due to the learning curve....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete ­ E
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Sep 2020
     
Sep 02, 2020 04:03 |  #21

Thanks to everyone for taking the time and trouble to post info and suggestions it really is much appreciated..

I will hopefully be following up some of the ideas and suggestions at the weekend..

Thanks again,

Peter




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete ­ E
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Sep 2020
     
Sep 02, 2020 17:06 |  #22

RicoTudor wrote in post #19118572 (external link)
As mentioned by windpig, you don't need modelling lights or continuous ring lights if the lighting is to be flat and shadowless. Shadowless is synonymous with directionless, and for that you want to use a room-sized bounce from a flash or strobe. The room should be all-around white or off-white, while the lighting instrument can be a single $20 manual flash off eBay. No further lights or modifiers are needed.


I shot a heap of such objects for an art catalog in assembly-line fashion with no exposure adjustments at all.

Given the number of people who have suggest trying a flash, I should add that I do have a Speedlite 420ex and a small diffuser so that is a possibility which I may follow up...

Also, out of curiousity, I tried using the cameras live-view with a small LED desk lamp I happened to have, and no black lines, indicating to me the ring light is poorly designed for the job...

Anyway i hope to try things out in earnest at the weekend when I have more time....

Regards,

Peter




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,924 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2268
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Sep 02, 2020 19:02 |  #23

the bigger the diffuser the better, that's why the diffuser in the link I posted is nice. The closer you are to the subject the small the diffuser needs to be. Are you able to set up a tripod? if so live view using a flashlight for enough to focus if there is not enough ambient light available.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,035 views & 7 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Ring Light Problem/Question...
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1348 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.