Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 26 Mar 2006 (Sunday) 14:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

UK photographic laws

 
phil1664
Member
Avatar
96 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Mar 26, 2006 14:52 |  #1

Just a quick refresher here, but I'm pretty sure that if you plan to shoot a 17 year old in the UK, you need parental permission. There's no nudity involved but I'm pretty sure that's the case.

Anyone think different??


www.minus9photography.​co.uk (external link)

Feedback always welcome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ Parr
should have taken his own advice
Avatar
6,593 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Mar 26, 2006 14:57 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

phil1664 wrote:
Just a quick refresher here, but I'm pretty sure that if you plan to shoot a 17 year old in the UK, you need parental permission. There's no nudity involved but I'm pretty sure that's the case.

Anyone think different??

Why not just get the permission?

When in doubt, and all that...


Steve

Canon Bodies, Canon Lenses, Sigma Lenses, Various "Stuff"...

OnStage Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
Mar 27, 2006 05:46 |  #3

To cover yourself, get signed permission AND have at least one parent present.


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phil1664
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
96 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Mar 27, 2006 11:12 |  #4

I've got a letter made up already and I think she's bringing her Aunty too- would never consider this alone, at least on the first time round!

Thanks for your advice guys


www.minus9photography.​co.uk (external link)

Feedback always welcome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Mar 27, 2006 11:41 |  #5

i think untill they are 18 parent,s need to give permission ,although i agree it might be best if a older person is with them.
however that can spoil the shoot as they feel they canno't be themselve's it's such a shame that photography has come to this.
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sean-Mcr
Goldmember
Avatar
1,813 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Manchester, England
     
Mar 27, 2006 11:56 |  #6

when a 17 year old is arrested the parents do not need to be informed in the UK if the 17 year old doesn't wish it. So i'd be surprised if a 17 year old needed to inform their parents.

But then brits are bonkers (i'm irish)


I don't know what good composition is.... Sometimes for me composition has to do with a certain brightness or a certain coming to restness and other times it has to do with funny mistakes. There's a kind of rightness and wrongness and sometimes I like rightness and sometimes I like wrongness. Diane Arbus



http://www.pbase.com/s​ean_mcr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichardtheSane
Goldmember
Avatar
3,011 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
     
Mar 27, 2006 17:20 as a reply to  @ Sean-Mcr's post |  #7

Sean-Mcr wrote:
But then brits are bonkers (i'm irish)

I'm a brit and I totally agree

But I do believe that under 18's are still considered as minors


If in doubt, I shut up...

Gear: 40D, 12-24mm AT-X Pro, 17-85mm, Sigma 150mm Macro Sigma 100-300 F4, 550EX, other stuff that probably helps me on my way.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cyber-rat
Junior Member
Avatar
27 posts
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
     
Mar 28, 2006 07:28 |  #8

Just to shoot, you don't need parental permission. A 17 year old can even give consent under the Data Protection Act for their personal data (which could include photos) to be processed (i.e. used).

Even the Protection of Children Act, which makes it an offence to take an indecent photograph of a child, defines a child as someone aged under 16 years.

But if the photos are to be sold to an stock image library, many of them will demand a model release which is also signed by a parent or guardian of the model is under 18. And if it is to be used commercially for advertising it is much safer to get parental consent.

But yes, safer to get parental consent if you can, to save any possible argument later.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sean-Mcr
Goldmember
Avatar
1,813 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Manchester, England
     
Mar 28, 2006 08:13 as a reply to  @ RichardtheSane's post |  #9

RichardtheSane wrote:
I'm a brit and I totally agree

But I do believe that under 18's are still considered as minors

Like i said boyo, bonkers

http://www.plymouth.go​v.uk …owurrights/ypmi​x17-18.htm (external link)

It's not bonkers that you can do the below at 17, but it would be bonkers if you could not give permission to have your photograph taken at 17.

  • You can give blood
  • You can be interviewed by the police with no adult present
  • You can be tried before an adult court and sent to prison or fined up to £2,000
  • You can engage in street trading
  • You can purchase an air rifle
  • You can buy or hire a crossbow, gun and ammunition
  • You can hold a licence to drive most vehicles (except certain heavy ones)
  • You can take your driving test
  • You can buy a car or motorcycle
  • You can drive a motorcycle, car, van or tractor on the road
  • You can pilot a plane
  • You can apply for a helicopter pilot’s licence
  • You can emigrate
  • A care order can no longer be made on you
  • You can go into a betting shop (but not bet)

I don't know what good composition is.... Sometimes for me composition has to do with a certain brightness or a certain coming to restness and other times it has to do with funny mistakes. There's a kind of rightness and wrongness and sometimes I like rightness and sometimes I like wrongness. Diane Arbus



http://www.pbase.com/s​ean_mcr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,838 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
UK photographic laws
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1039 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.