Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 01 Nov 2020 (Sunday) 09:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Not able to calibrate monitor - color & brightness

 
KLR-VA0501
Member
Avatar
199 posts
Likes: 87
Joined Feb 2012
     
Nov 01, 2020 09:58 |  #1

If I had enough hair to sacrifice, I would be pulling it out at this point.

I have an ASUS PB278Q which I have been very happy with over the years. Lately, I have noticed that both the colors and the brightness are lacking when I print. I can't say for sure when I first noticed this but it has become increasingly annoying. I look at my photos on the monitor and the colors pop, good contrast, good definition of blacks and whites, etc. but when I look at my prints, they just look blah.

I have a very dark room that I work in and calibrate once a month. I am really at a loss as to what to do at this point. It seems like I end up throwing money away when I get my prints made and they come back dark and with the color washed out. I use Datacolor Spyder X Elite for calibration.

I work in both Lightroom and Photoshop and soft-proof quite a bit; not every photo I print, but most. I have not seen anything when I soft-proof that would give my any concerns. As with the files I export for printing, I am careful to use the correct color profiles when I soft-proof.

I use Bay Photo for most of my prints and I am very careful to use the correct color profiles when I export my files for printing and I specify "No Color Correction" when I get my prints. I am thinking of having some of my latest prints redone using color correction just to see if the results are much different.

I think I have covered the critical details about my editing and printing.


Ken
Canon EOS R | RF 14-35 f/4L | EF 100 f/2.8L Macro | RF 24-105 f/4L | RF 70-200 f/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,255 posts
Likes: 1525
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Nov 01, 2020 11:35 |  #2

Good review of the monitor, with lots of recommendations, at https://www.tftcentral​.co.uk/reviews/asus_pb​278q.htm (external link).

By the way the review dates from 2010; is you monitor perhaps 8 years old? Are you using Windows? Is there a driver that might need updating?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,420 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4508
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 2 years ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all)
     
Nov 01, 2020 12:35 |  #3

KLR-VA0501 wrote in post #19146341 (external link)
...when I get my prints made and they come back dark and with the color washed out.

If your prints are 'too dark', I presume that you failed to start with fundamental monitor Brightness and Contrast adjustments BEFORE doing monitor calibration (which affects HUES) How does this image look on your monitor?

IMAGE: https://hosting.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/grayscale_adjust.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://app.photobucke​t.com …9f-4701-887e-c17b85c6d11b  (external link)

Adjust Brightness and Contrast to be able to discern all 26 steps, then redo your monitor calibration for Hue.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
Moderator
Avatar
15,097 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 436
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Nov 01, 2020 22:56 |  #4

KLR-VA0501 wrote in post #19146341 (external link)
If I had enough hair to sacrifice, I would be pulling it out at this point.

I have an ASUS PB278Q which I have been very happy with over the years. Lately, I have noticed that both the colors and the brightness are lacking when I print. I can't say for sure when I first noticed this but it has become increasingly annoying. I look at my photos on the monitor and the colors pop, good contrast, good definition of blacks and whites, etc. but when I look at my prints, they just look blah.

I have a very dark room that I work in and calibrate once a month. I am really at a loss as to what to do at this point. It seems like I end up throwing money away when I get my prints made and they come back dark and with the color washed out. I use Datacolor Spyder X Elite for calibration.


Could be a few things happening.
You could be working in an environment not suited to your calibration.
There could be something wrong with the calibration.
There could be something wrong with the printer
There maybe something wrong with the files your sending to the printer
Could be any combination of the above :)


To start with, what process are you following to calibrate the monitor?
And, what White Point and Luminance values are you using?


flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KLR-VA0501
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
199 posts
Likes: 87
Joined Feb 2012
     
Nov 03, 2020 13:54 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #5

Making progress. I did check brightness and contrast based on the included graphic. I have had a copy of that for quite awhile but keep forgetting about it. Both contrast and brightness were off. Contrast by about 10; went from 80 to 91. Brightness was off by a bunch; went all the way down to zero.

With the most recent adjustments and re-calibration after adjust contrast and brightness, I am seeing much closer results between monitor and prints. When I re-calibrated, the calibration wanted me to raise the brightness which seemed odd. I did but I have since dropped it back to zero which seems to be much more in line with what I see when I print.


Ken
Canon EOS R | RF 14-35 f/4L | EF 100 f/2.8L Macro | RF 24-105 f/4L | RF 70-200 f/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
Moderator
Avatar
15,097 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 436
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Nov 03, 2020 22:26 |  #6

KLR-VA0501 wrote in post #19147277 (external link)
Making progress. I did check brightness and contrast based on the included graphic. I have had a copy of that for quite awhile but keep forgetting about it. Both contrast and brightness were off. Contrast by about 10; went from 80 to 91. Brightness was off by a bunch; went all the way down to zero.

With the most recent adjustments and re-calibration after adjust contrast and brightness, I am seeing much closer results between monitor and prints. When I re-calibrated, the calibration wanted me to raise the brightness which seemed odd. I did but I have since dropped it back to zero which seems to be much more in line with what I see when I print.


If your doing the calibration properly, it will set the contrast and brightness for you.
But it is very dependent on the luminance target you set, which is how bright you want the monitor based on the light levels in the room.


flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ra40
Goldmember
Avatar
2,091 posts
Gallery: 887 photos
Likes: 3561
Joined Jan 2013
Location: So. Cal
     
Nov 04, 2020 01:21 |  #7

Check your luminance target, it may be to low for the monitors as they age.

When the NEC's were newish I could set Spectraview to a target intensity candela of 65 cd/m2. As the monitors aged that dim of a setting was not obtainable and I'd get a delta that was 2.XX+. Now they are set to 90 or 95 cd/m2 and that yields an acceptable level that what I see on screen is what I'll get in a print off my Epson.

I also have printer profiles from the lab I use for the intended printer. Depending what is being printed those are applied/baked into the file for the desired results. Generically my lab does most sRGB so that's not to hard on an export file. The guys that run the machines know how my work is so they can adjust if I don't apply a profile so that it matches my usual look.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

601 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Not able to calibrate monitor - color & brightness
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1224 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.