Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 15 Nov 2020 (Sunday) 10:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Who / what is Fro?

 
patrick ­ j
Goldmember
2,447 posts
Gallery: 76 photos
Likes: 8623
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Denver
     
Nov 30, 2020 11:29 |  #31

Croasdail wrote in post #19159015 (external link)
Assuming "youtube influencers" equates to someone who knows a lot about a subject, or is a leader in the field would be a very precarious reasoning to base anything off of. Nothing against "fro" aka Jared Palin... but his body of work doesn't elevate him to a leader in the field. Not many of the Youtube "reviewers" have portfolios that are better than some of the better photographers here.

There are some on Youtube that are very good.... but Jared is a reviewer.... he is competent... but not inspiring

I think being a good photographer and being a good reviewer of the technical merits of a lens or a camera have little relationship to each other. I don't worry much about whether or not Dustin Abbott is a good photographer when I read a review of a camera by him, for example.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,128 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 887
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
Post edited over 2 years ago by Croasdail.
     
Nov 30, 2020 18:56 |  #32

patrick j wrote in post #19159731 (external link)
I think being a good photographer and being a good reviewer of the technical merits of a lens or a camera have little relationship to each other. I don't worry much about whether or not Dustin Abbott is a good photographer when I read a review of a camera by him, for example.

I would be willing to wager you are to some extent correct. My son is a crack mechanic, who likes to buy tools specific to a task. He restores older motorcycles. He is the first to tell you that the right tool makes all the difference. He will also tell you he is a fanatic about the quality of tools... but is less so about brand.

At the end of the day though... he can get done what he needs to do regardless. The right tool makes it easier, but his skills are enough to get done what ever he needs to do. He is also a crack artist, and a good photographer. He still uses a Sony a6000.. and claims he has no desire to upgrade... though he does make himself welcome to my equipment from time to time.

So yes... tools matter. But a good photographer can create without the latest and greatest. Like my son, I would rather spend on traveling to compelling content then spending on equipment thinking that will differentiate my work from others.

But I do like new toys... lets behest about this.

.... Additional thought....

It is rather odd to me that the competence of the review with regard to the subject is irrelevant to you though. There are some sports photographers I deeply respect their opinions, because their body of work shows they know the intricacies and issues a sports photographer can deal with... such as how far and how well the camera can connect via wifi to a remote or ftp site... something a fashion photographer would have no need nor experience to understand. There is a great review from a photographer from Dubai on the Sony 100-600 lens versus a the native 600 f4. His clients didn't care if the bokeh was better with the f4 lens... they were not willing to pay for the difference. A lot hear sweat about how good the bokeh is.... but if the customer/client isn't wiling to pay a premium for that... it is pointless and a bad business investment. At the end of the day... what you business is makes a difference on what is worth paying for... something Jared has brought up correctly so in the past.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,589 views & 25 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 9 members.
Who / what is Fro?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1093 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.