Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 22 Mar 2021 (Monday) 12:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Imaging prints

 
DragonSpeed
Goldmember
Avatar
2,216 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Likes: 819
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Burnaby British Columbia, Canada
     
Mar 22, 2021 12:50 |  #1

I have recently embarked upon the noble task of scanning all my negatives from my pre-digital days. In the process, I have discovered a number of prints to which I do NOT have the negatives. I'm looking for suggestions about how I can image these prints (a mix of glossy and matte) without spending a fortune. The negative scanner already put me back $700(CAD).

Some sort of lightbox? Any suggestions?

Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4506
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 22, 2021 12:55 |  #2

Flatbed scanner works on prints.

Or shoot the print with your camera, light the print from 45 degree angle to each side of the print.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DragonSpeed
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,216 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Likes: 819
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Burnaby British Columbia, Canada
     
Mar 23, 2021 11:26 |  #3

Wilt wrote in post #19212274 (external link)
Flatbed scanner works on prints.

Or shoot the print with your camera, light the print from 45 degree angle to each side of the print.

Would glossy prints scan OK with the flatbed, or would there be reflection issues?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
haoyuanren
Junior Member
21 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2021
     
Mar 24, 2021 00:26 |  #4

One would think with enough light and a polarizer the reflections would be no issue.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
5,768 posts
Likes: 1250
Joined May 2007
     
Mar 24, 2021 05:46 |  #5

I have done some archiving like this before and I just took a photo of the photo using my digital camera and it worked well.



5D Mk IV & 7D Mk II
EF 16-35 f/4L EF 50 f/1.8 (Original) EF 24-105 f/4L EF 100 f/2.8L Macro EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L[/FONT]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DragonSpeed
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,216 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Likes: 819
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Burnaby British Columbia, Canada
     
Mar 24, 2021 08:13 |  #6

haoyuanren wrote in post #19212943 (external link)
One would think with enough light and a polarizer the reflections would be no issue.

I'm concerned about the reflection in a glossy print of the actual camera/lens if I'm shooting from above. Just overload the image with light from other angles to keep the reflection less?

Naturalist wrote in post #19213002 (external link)
I have done some archiving like this before and I just took a photo of the photo using my digital camera and it worked well.

Did you not have to deal with keystoning or the see yourself in the picture reflection from high gloss prints?

Thanks for the input... every bit will help.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
haoyuanren
Junior Member
21 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2021
     
Mar 24, 2021 10:45 as a reply to  @ DragonSpeed's post |  #7

If lit correctly there shouldn't be any spill on you which means nothing should reflect. You can go into tilt-shift territory to fix that if the reflection still is a problem but that's honestly in my opinion an overkill.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,611 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8349
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Mar 24, 2021 11:04 |  #8

.

DragonSpeed wrote in post #19213041 (external link)
.
Did you not have to deal with keystoning ..... ?
.

.
I have photographed several hundred paintings for artists. . I find that using a longer focal length and photographing from a moderate distance ensures that there will be no keystoning.

My 100-400mm v2 is my hands-down choice for doing this kind of work.

I typically shoot from a distance of 12 to 15 feet from the subject. . Most of the subjects I shoot are 16" by 20" or larger (sometimes much larger). . You could get the same results shooting from a closer distance if you are shooting tiny little images like 4" by 6", 8" by 10", etc.

I shoot from a tripod, and make sure that the piece I am photographing is hung so that it is perfectly square to the camera. . By that I mean that I want the surface of the painting to be perfectly parallel to the camera's sensor, and the axis from the center of the painting to the center of the lens to be perfectly perpendicular to the plane of the sensor.


.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,130 views & 2 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Imaging prints
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
595 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.