I was wondering what you would consider an ideal lens for a good panoramic view from a mountain top (mountain is only about 3500' high).
Thanks
GeneralT001 Member 31 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2020 More info | May 16, 2021 22:21 | #1 I was wondering what you would consider an ideal lens for a good panoramic view from a mountain top (mountain is only about 3500' high).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnfromPA Cream of the Crop 11,258 posts Likes: 1527 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info Post edited over 2 years ago by John from PA. (4 edits in all) | May 17, 2021 18:41 | #2 That isn’t an easy question to answer without knowing more about the “subject” and what you intend to do with it. How far away is the subject? Is the subject a significant characteristic of the image? What camera; cropped or full frame sensor will make a difference. Are you perhaps thinking of several images, then stitching them together in post? What you might think about is renting or borrowing a wide angle zoom and see what focal length fulfills your needs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick5 Goldmember More info | May 21, 2021 10:37 | #3 GeneralT001 wrote in post #19236560 I was wondering what you would consider an ideal lens for a good panoramic view from a mountain top (mountain is only about 3500' high). Thanks What lenses are in you Arsenal now General. Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited over 2 years ago by Wilt. | May 28, 2021 18:04 | #4 'Not too wide a FL', and a fixed FL rather than a zoom
You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Eiro Goldmember 1,368 posts Likes: 27 Joined Dec 2009 Location: U.S. More info | May 30, 2021 08:05 | #5 For years I’ve had 24-70mm as the go to for just about everything and always had the 16-35 right there in the bag just in case I wanted the WA shot, the combo worked well. But most recently started having more and more appreciation for the versatility of the 24-105mm and it just works well. Get out and shoot
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomReichner "That's what I do." 17,636 posts Gallery: 213 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 8386 Joined Dec 2008 Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot More info | May 30, 2021 09:24 | #6 Eiro wrote in post #19242052 . ..... I would probably take the 24-105mm with a carbon fiber tripod and that’s all I need to make it work for me. . . "Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1032 guests, 109 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||