Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 27 Jul 2021 (Tuesday) 06:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Digital has made us lazy

 
mwsilver
Goldmember
4,103 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 643
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Post edited over 2 years ago by mwsilver. (3 edits in all)
     
Aug 14, 2021 14:07 |  #31

digital paradise wrote in post #19265470 (external link)
Does anyone remember the thrill taking their first shot with a new digital camera and getting instant feedback? I do. I said screw the darkroom. That is when I got lazy. ;-)a

I took a long while to think about this before responding. I can certainly see your point but in the real world things are not as simplistic. Even back in the day, those who used the Brownie camera, the first readily available point & shoot, with the development of film rolls in the local drugstore, may have given the same impression to "real" photographers of that period. I admit that when I started shooting digital around 13 years ago I quickly realized that I could be lazy and careless and still get some good keepers out of a hundred images. But that was then, and this is now. These days I put as much or more effort into each digital shot compared to when I was shooting film exclusively. This is mostly a result of my increased experience and more clearly defined expectations. Where once I would go out for a day of shooting and capture two or three hundred images and cull them down to 30 or 40 keepers , now I will more likely capture only 50 or so images and still have the same 30 to 40 keepers.


Mark
Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,367 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1372
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
Post edited over 2 years ago by RDKirk.
     
Aug 14, 2021 14:34 |  #32

mwsilver wrote in post #19271585 (external link)
I took a long while to think about this before responding. I can certainly see your point but in the real world things are not as simplistic. Even back in the day, those who used the Brownie camera, the first readily available point & shoot, with the development of film rolls in the local drugstore, may have given the same impression to "real" photographers of that period. I admit that when I started shooting digital around 13 years ago I quickly realized that I could be lazy and careless and still get some good keepers out of a hundred images. But that was then, and this is now. These days I put as much or more effort into each digital shot compared to when I was shooting film exclusively. This is mostly a result of my increased experience and more clearly defined expectations. Where once I would go out for a day of shooting and capture two or three hundred images and cull them down to 30 or 40 keepers , now I will more likely capture only 50 or so images and still have the same 30 to 40 keepers.

I basically shoot the same number of images with digital in a portrait session as I did with film. However, because I have the option of easy composites, a lot of those images may be specifically for compositing.

For instance, if I'm shooting a family group with children (particularly little boys), I'll put the camera on a tripod and tell the parents to look good in each shot and don't worry about the children. Then I'll shoot a number of frames concentrating on each child in turn until I get what I want from each child. In the end, I'll composite everyone's best image. That's the image that will go on the wall.

A lot of shots, but each one with purpose.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drsilver
Goldmember
Avatar
2,644 posts
Gallery: 904 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 10558
Joined Mar 2010
Location: North Bend, WA
     
Aug 14, 2021 15:24 |  #33

I remember when I got my first P&S digital camera. Instead of spending hours in the darkroom souping negatives and making prints, all I had to do was plug one end of a cord into the camera and the other into a computer.

And I remember thinking, what a pain in the ass. They should make this wireless.


Flickr (external link) : Instagram (web)] (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drsilver
Goldmember
Avatar
2,644 posts
Gallery: 904 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 10558
Joined Mar 2010
Location: North Bend, WA
     
Aug 15, 2021 02:03 |  #34

There was another thread about bags where we talked about how we used to carry 4 or 5 primes, but now we carry 2 giant zooms.

With a selection of primes, you need to move your feet to match the perspective you want from the particular lens you pull out of the bag.

With zooms, I tend to stand in one place and frame it up however it looks from there. I don't think much about moving my feet to match my focal length. So I do get lazy that way.


Flickr (external link) : Instagram (web)] (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,367 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1372
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Aug 15, 2021 07:23 |  #35

drsilver wrote in post #19271787 (external link)
There was another thread about bags where we talked about how we used to carry 4 or 5 primes, but now we carry 2 giant zooms.

With a selection of primes, you need to move your feet to match the perspective you want from the particular lens you pull out of the bag.

With zooms, I tend to stand in one place and frame it up however it looks from there. I don't think much about moving my feet to match my focal length. So I do get lazy that way.

If given freedom to move, I set my distance according to the perspective I want, then set my focal length according to the framing I want.

Having zoom lenses relieves me of carrying so many lenses, but doesn't change how I use distance and focal length.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,584 views & 30 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it and it is followed by 14 members.
Digital has made us lazy
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1245 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.