Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
Thread started 20 Oct 2021 (Wednesday) 12:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New Tax Law for selling.

 
strobe ­ monkey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,557 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 172
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Arizona
     
Jan 18, 2023 12:58 |  #46

WTF! So you pay tax for a used item you sell, that you already paid tax on when you bought it?


R5, RF 85 f1.2L, RF 50 f1.8, 6D, EF16-35 F4L IS, EF50 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 L Macro IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Furlan
Senior Member
867 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Nov 2012
     
Jan 18, 2023 14:11 |  #47

strobe monkey wrote in post #19469400 (external link)
WTF! So you pay tax for a used item you sell, that you already paid tax on when you bought it?

No you only pay tax on the profit you make when you sell it. Myself I would be happy to pay the tax but I never sold anything for more than what I paid for it. Before all is said and done I think the $600
they originally will rise substantially. I sure they put it off this year because they realized they would be buried in 1099 forms.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4506
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited 9 months ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all)
     
Jan 18, 2023 22:40 |  #48

strobe monkey wrote in post #19469400 (external link)
WTF! So you pay tax for a used item you sell, that you already paid tax on when you bought it?

Wow...finally somebody gets why I brought up the change in reducing the limit to $600 (originally intended to take effect in 2022)! Nobody 'got it' before you, that I can recall in threads on this topic.

I sold a Beseler 45V-XL enlarger with Universal head and three enlarging lenses, and I no longer have purchase receipts to prove it was my personal property purchased new about 30 years ago. If the buyer had paid via Zelle or Paypal, I would have the problem of proving my purchase price was three times what I sold it for and NOT 'all profit'...and taxed for a second time for the recovery of my already-taxed money by selling my personal property.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4506
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited 9 months ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 18, 2023 22:46 |  #49

Furlan wrote in post #19469419 (external link)
No you only pay tax on the profit you make when you sell it.

And how do I prove what I paid for a new Beseler 45V-XL and new enlarging lenses 30 years ago, and sold it for a small fraction of my original purchase price?!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goalerjones
Goldmember
Avatar
1,804 posts
Gallery: 387 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5675
Joined May 2018
     
Jan 19, 2023 21:46 |  #50

for now anyway, the $600 thing has been shelved, probably after tons of pushback. https://www.irs.gov …nt-platforms-forms-1099-k (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
moose10101
registered smartass
1,778 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 334
Joined May 2010
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Jan 20, 2023 12:29 |  #51

goalerjones wrote in post #19469949 (external link)
for now anyway, the $600 thing has been shelved, probably after tons of pushback. https://www.irs.gov …nt-platforms-forms-1099-k (external link)

Not shelved, just delayed a year. It’s in effect for this year’s transactions.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsiegler
Senior Member
Avatar
532 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 963
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Mar 02, 2023 12:44 |  #52

Thanks for everyone's comments. I've sold quite a bit of old equipment this year. This info will come in handy!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drsilver
Goldmember
Avatar
2,640 posts
Gallery: 900 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 10525
Joined Mar 2010
Location: North Bend, WA
     
Mar 02, 2023 16:03 |  #53

Wilt wrote in post #19469582 (external link)
Wow...finally somebody gets why I brought up the change in reducing the limit to $600 (originally intended to take effect in 2022)! Nobody 'got it' before you, that I can recall in threads on this topic.

I sold a Beseler 45V-XL enlarger with Universal head and three enlarging lenses, and I no longer have purchase receipts to prove it was my personal property purchased new about 30 years ago. If the buyer had paid via Zelle or Paypal, I would have the problem of proving my purchase price was three times what I sold it for and NOT 'all profit'...and taxed for a second time for the recovery of my already-taxed money by selling my personal property.

This isn't tax advice. If you get audited, you're on your own.

Still, just put down a good-faith number for the original purchase price. The IRS knows that if you sold something for money, you probably paid more than $0 to acquire it in the first place. If the number you put down is based in reality, in the unlikely event you're ever asked to defend that number, with or without receipts, the IRS will probably accept your explanation. This is especially true if you don't have enough transactions to demonstrate a pattern of overvaluing costs.

We've been warned, though. My whole life, selling old stuff to fund new stuff has been part of my game, and you know I'm in the hole. I keep pretty good records already, but now it's official.


Flickr (external link) : Instagram (web)] (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4506
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 02, 2023 16:21 |  #54

drsilver wrote in post #19487902 (external link)
This isn't tax advice. If you get audited, you're on your own.

Still, just put down a good-faith number for the original purchase price. The IRS knows that if you sold something for money, you probably paid more than $0 to acquire it in the first place. If the number you put down is based in reality, in the unlikely event you're ever asked to defend that number, with or without receipts, the IRS will probably accept your explanation. This is especially true if you don't have enough transactions to demonstrate a pattern of overvaluing costs.

We've been warned, though. My whole life, selling old stuff to fund new stuff has been part of my game, and you know I'm in the hole. I keep pretty good records already, but now it's official.

Because starting in 2023 tax return you may be considered guilty (owing tax on so-called 'income' which is actually a 'sale of personal property') because of otherwise inability to prove your innocence!  :p


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Capn ­ Jack
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,179 posts
Gallery: 2961 photos
Likes: 27724
Joined Mar 2010
Location: NE USA
     
Mar 02, 2023 16:39 |  #55

Wilt wrote in post #19487909 (external link)
Because starting in 2023 tax return you may be considered guilty (owing tax on so-called 'income' which is actually a 'sale of personal property') because of otherwise inability to prove your innocence!  :p

Are you a tax attorney? Professional tax advisor?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4506
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited 7 months ago by Wilt.
     
Mar 02, 2023 16:41 |  #56

Capn Jack wrote in post #19487914 (external link)
Are you a tax attorney? Professional tax advisor?

I am giving no advice, merely stating a layperson's expectations of how reality plays out.
Earlier in this same thread, I stated what a tax advisor had told me about how they would handle same situation, and declared that as coming from said tax advisor retained by TurboTax.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Capn ­ Jack
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,179 posts
Gallery: 2961 photos
Likes: 27724
Joined Mar 2010
Location: NE USA
     
Mar 02, 2023 16:44 |  #57

Wilt wrote in post #19487918 (external link)
I am giving no advice, merely stating a layperson's expectations of how reality plays out.

Good that you made it clear.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drsilver
Goldmember
Avatar
2,640 posts
Gallery: 900 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 10525
Joined Mar 2010
Location: North Bend, WA
     
Mar 02, 2023 19:56 |  #58

Wilt wrote in post #19487909 (external link)
Because starting in 2023 tax return you may be considered guilty (owing tax on so-called 'income' which is actually a 'sale of personal property') because of otherwise inability to prove your innocence!  :p

I think you're overestimating the IRS concern over the sale of your Beseler. (Nice kit, BTW. I worked under a 23C every day for a lot of years. Nikon shooter.)

If you need to put down a purchase price, tell them the truth, to the best of your recollection. They'll take that.

If you're running a business, buying low, selling high, making a profit, the IRS can tell and will want its piece.


Flickr (external link) : Instagram (web)] (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,398 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 515
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
Post edited 5 months ago by Scott M.
     
May 04, 2023 09:42 |  #59

DylanScotland wrote in post #19514388 (external link)
It can definitely seem like you're being double-taxed on items you sell that you've already paid tax on when you bought them. However, keep in mind that taxes can be a complicated and nuanced topic. So, it might be worth looking into more details and consulting with a tax professional to fully understand how the law affects you.

It's really two different taxes with regards to buying and selling. Upon purchase, you pay a state sales tax on the purchase amount -- assuming you are in a state that has a sales tax. When you sell the equipment, you will be on the hook for a federal income tax, but only if you make a profit on the item (i.e. sell it for more than you paid), and then you are only on the hook for the profit -- not the actual amount the item sold for.

We have been selling a lot of different items we have accumulated over the years, and starting last year I began keeping a spreadsheet of everything we sold. For each item, I list the price and date sold, and the price and date the item was acquired (to the best of my recollection). We were "in the red" last year (total sales were at a loss), and we will be again this year. So, we shouldn't have to pay any income tax. Our accountant will get a copy of the spreadsheet, so she can figure out how to file the loss -- that's what we pay her for. ;-)a


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited 5 months ago by TeamSpeed. (5 edits in all)
     
May 04, 2023 10:04 |  #60

This law has been in place for years, it was just different limits before a 1099K was issued by a payment vendor, like paypal.

I have had to deal with this for what seems like years. I have always reported any income that was business related, but personal sales would push me over the reporting limit, so then I had to list the sold assets that were a loss on one of the tax forms to offset those items. This just means now just about everyone is affected by this.

I worked around this eventually by having people pay for personal items through my wife's paypal account, and then mine was limited to solely business, this way there was a separation. In any case, you will likely need to keep a spreadsheet of big ticket items you buy, with date and amount, and then when you sell, you can reference that for the details of the original purchase, like a google sheets page or something.

It certainly stinks for the common folks that don't actually have businesses and would like to sell off things to pay for other things or just to downsize.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,282 views & 35 likes for this thread, 23 members have posted to it and it is followed by 12 members.
New Tax Law for selling.
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
708 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.