WTF! So you pay tax for a used item you sell, that you already paid tax on when you bought it?
Jan 18, 2023 12:58 | #46 WTF! So you pay tax for a used item you sell, that you already paid tax on when you bought it? R5, RF 85 f1.2L, RF 50 f1.8, 6D, EF16-35 F4L IS, EF50 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 L Macro IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Furlan Senior Member 867 posts Likes: 213 Joined Nov 2012 More info | Jan 18, 2023 14:11 | #47 strobe monkey wrote in post #19469400 WTF! So you pay tax for a used item you sell, that you already paid tax on when you bought it? No you only pay tax on the profit you make when you sell it. Myself I would be happy to pay the tax but I never sold anything for more than what I paid for it. Before all is said and done I think the $600
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited 9 months ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all) | Jan 18, 2023 22:40 | #48 strobe monkey wrote in post #19469400 WTF! So you pay tax for a used item you sell, that you already paid tax on when you bought it? Wow...finally somebody gets why I brought up the change in reducing the limit to $600 (originally intended to take effect in 2022)! Nobody 'got it' before you, that I can recall in threads on this topic. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited 9 months ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all) | Jan 18, 2023 22:46 | #49 Furlan wrote in post #19469419 No you only pay tax on the profit you make when you sell it. And how do I prove what I paid for a new Beseler 45V-XL and new enlarging lenses 30 years ago, and sold it for a small fraction of my original purchase price?! You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 19, 2023 21:46 | #50 for now anyway, the $600 thing has been shelved, probably after tons of pushback. https://www.irs.gov …nt-platforms-forms-1099-k
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moose10101 registered smartass More info | Jan 20, 2023 12:29 | #51 goalerjones wrote in post #19469949 for now anyway, the $600 thing has been shelved, probably after tons of pushback. https://www.irs.gov …nt-platforms-forms-1099-k Not shelved, just delayed a year. It’s in effect for this year’s transactions.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 02, 2023 12:44 | #52 Thanks for everyone's comments. I've sold quite a bit of old equipment this year. This info will come in handy!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drsilver Goldmember More info | Mar 02, 2023 16:03 | #53 Wilt wrote in post #19469582 Wow...finally somebody gets why I brought up the change in reducing the limit to $600 (originally intended to take effect in 2022)! Nobody 'got it' before you, that I can recall in threads on this topic. I sold a Beseler 45V-XL enlarger with Universal head and three enlarging lenses, and I no longer have purchase receipts to prove it was my personal property purchased new about 30 years ago. If the buyer had paid via Zelle or Paypal, I would have the problem of proving my purchase price was three times what I sold it for and NOT 'all profit'...and taxed for a second time for the recovery of my already-taxed money by selling my personal property. This isn't tax advice. If you get audited, you're on your own.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Mar 02, 2023 16:21 | #54 drsilver wrote in post #19487902 This isn't tax advice. If you get audited, you're on your own. Still, just put down a good-faith number for the original purchase price. The IRS knows that if you sold something for money, you probably paid more than $0 to acquire it in the first place. If the number you put down is based in reality, in the unlikely event you're ever asked to defend that number, with or without receipts, the IRS will probably accept your explanation. This is especially true if you don't have enough transactions to demonstrate a pattern of overvaluing costs. We've been warned, though. My whole life, selling old stuff to fund new stuff has been part of my game, and you know I'm in the hole. I keep pretty good records already, but now it's official. Because starting in 2023 tax return you may be considered guilty (owing tax on so-called 'income' which is actually a 'sale of personal property') because of otherwise inability to prove your innocence! You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CapnJack Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 02, 2023 16:39 | #55 Wilt wrote in post #19487909 Because starting in 2023 tax return you may be considered guilty (owing tax on so-called 'income' which is actually a 'sale of personal property') because of otherwise inability to prove your innocence! ![]() Are you a tax attorney? Professional tax advisor?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited 7 months ago by Wilt. | Mar 02, 2023 16:41 | #56 Capn Jack wrote in post #19487914 Are you a tax attorney? Professional tax advisor? I am giving no advice, merely stating a layperson's expectations of how reality plays out. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CapnJack Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 02, 2023 16:44 | #57 Wilt wrote in post #19487918 I am giving no advice, merely stating a layperson's expectations of how reality plays out. Good that you made it clear.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drsilver Goldmember More info | Mar 02, 2023 19:56 | #58 Wilt wrote in post #19487909 Because starting in 2023 tax return you may be considered guilty (owing tax on so-called 'income' which is actually a 'sale of personal property') because of otherwise inability to prove your innocence! ![]() I think you're overestimating the IRS concern over the sale of your Beseler. (Nice kit, BTW. I worked under a 23C every day for a lot of years. Nikon shooter.)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottM Goldmember More info Post edited 5 months ago by Scott M. | May 04, 2023 09:42 | #59 DylanScotland wrote in post #19514388 It can definitely seem like you're being double-taxed on items you sell that you've already paid tax on when you bought them. However, keep in mind that taxes can be a complicated and nuanced topic. So, it might be worth looking into more details and consulting with a tax professional to fully understand how the law affects you. It's really two different taxes with regards to buying and selling. Upon purchase, you pay a state sales tax on the purchase amount -- assuming you are in a state that has a sales tax. When you sell the equipment, you will be on the hook for a federal income tax, but only if you make a profit on the item (i.e. sell it for more than you paid), and then you are only on the hook for the profit -- not the actual amount the item sold for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info Post edited 5 months ago by TeamSpeed. (5 edits in all) | May 04, 2023 10:04 | #60 This law has been in place for years, it was just different limits before a 1099K was issued by a payment vendor, like paypal. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 708 guests, 146 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||