Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Forum FAQ and Information Forum Talk 
Thread started 29 Dec 2021 (Wednesday) 18:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Suggestion from the new guy

 
Jay ­ Mcgillicudy
Member
Avatar
102 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 338
Joined Dec 2021
     
Dec 29, 2021 18:29 |  #1

As a newbie here, and an amateur/beginner, I am doing more surfing than posting. One thing I am finding is that there are a ton of broken links in the older posts and without a reference photo, the comments that are still up are useless. "could use more fill light on the left" left of what, there is no image left anymore. And it is impossible to tell from the title which posts have broken links. It can be discouraging to look through 30 posts and find only 3 or 4 that are still useful anymore. I know it would take a ton of time for the Mods to go through and clean up the old stuff, but it would make surfing more productive and would probably save a ton of data space.


The view from the top of the mountain is the same for everyone, it doesn't matter how long it takes you to get to the top nor how often you fall nor how many people passed you on the climb. As long as you do not give up the reward is there for you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,821 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16157
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Dec 29, 2021 19:14 |  #2

Jay Mcgillicudy wrote in post #19324017 (external link)
I know it would take a ton of time for the Mods to go through and clean up the old stuff, but it would make surfing more productive and would probably save a ton of data space.

Do you mean delete those old posts? It seems to me the original posters might object. What they added to the forum is their work to make decisions about, as long as it complies with the forum rules. A post with a missing photo might still have value for what the poster wrote. The huge workload, which you mention, is another reason not to do it. Mods are volunteers, and there aren't a great number of active ones on board.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Dec 29, 2021 19:24 |  #3

This is true of any forum, and no forum goes through a thread cleanup to purge posts that have missing or invalid links that I have ever seen. It costs annually to host your photos and reference materials and after a while, someone may just stop paying, creating the most common black hole of the internet: orphaned links.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WSYPhotography
Member
Avatar
163 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 102
Joined Dec 2021
Location: London
     
Dec 30, 2021 07:38 |  #4

Yeah that's the issue with older posts, however, it's really up to the admin to delete. Some advice in these old threads might be gold, so we can't really go deleting things in bulk.


We are WeShootYou (external link) London Family Photographers & Wedding Photographers (external link). We absolutely adore candid photography in all it's forms.
Sony A7RIV, 135mm Sigma F/1.8, Sigma 85mm DG HSM ART F/1.4, Sigma 50mm 1.8 F/1/4 ART, Sigma 35mm F/1.8.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jay ­ Mcgillicudy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
102 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 338
Joined Dec 2021
     
Dec 30, 2021 13:16 |  #5

WSYPhotography wrote in post #19324215 (external link)
Yeah that's the issue with older posts, however, it's really up to the admin to delete. Some advice in these old threads might be gold, so we can't really go deleting things in bulk.

And that is exactly my point, that many of these posts would be golden, but the picture is long gone and the advice on how to improve it cannot be visualized without the reference. Just the People Forum alone, you probably can't find 10 pictures in the first 15 pages of threads. And to find those 10 pictures you have to wade through approximately 450 initial posts and all the subsequent replies (although there is not much point once you see the pic is gone). I dont know why the original author would object to taking down a message that no longer contains his image. But I understand that it won't be done because of the work involved, just saying...


The view from the top of the mountain is the same for everyone, it doesn't matter how long it takes you to get to the top nor how often you fall nor how many people passed you on the climb. As long as you do not give up the reward is there for you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,717 posts
Likes: 4035
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 30, 2021 13:39 |  #6

Jay Mcgillicudy wrote in post #19324340 (external link)
And that is exactly my point, that many of these posts would be golden, but the picture is long gone and the advice on how to improve it cannot be visualized without the reference. Just the People Forum alone, you probably can't find 10 pictures in the first 15 pages of threads. And to find those 10 pictures you have to wade through approximately 450 initial posts and all the subsequent replies (although there is not much point once you see the pic is gone). I dont know why the original author would object to taking down a message that no longer contains his image. But I understand that it won't be done because of the work involved, just saying...

The problem you describe is just a artifact of any forum. However, there is something you can do. Instead of going to the oldest posts first, work backwards starting with the newest. Some of the threads here are quite old and people change image server platforms often abandoning the old sites. When the admins from the image hosting sites delete the photos, they disappear everywhere.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jay ­ Mcgillicudy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
102 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 338
Joined Dec 2021
     
Dec 30, 2021 15:43 |  #7

gjl711 wrote in post #19324349 (external link)
The problem you describe is just a artifact of any forum. However, there is something you can do. Instead of going to the oldest posts first, work backwards starting with the newest. Some of the threads here are quite old and people change image server platforms often abandoning the old sites. When the admins from the image hosting sites delete the photos, they disappear everywhere.

I agree that it is an issue to some degree with forums, but I am active in many forums where the issue is not so prevalent. For example, many automotive forums host the photos of the author and an old post for repair purposes is often as useful as a newer post that may not relate to your vehicle. I suspect that Photo forums, where the material that is being discussed is stored off site are much more prone to the broken link issue. Plus, I was only making an observation and it helps establish my post count.


The view from the top of the mountain is the same for everyone, it doesn't matter how long it takes you to get to the top nor how often you fall nor how many people passed you on the climb. As long as you do not give up the reward is there for you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
22,948 posts
Gallery: 457 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 15518
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU
     
Dec 31, 2021 09:31 |  #8

Jay Mcgillicudy wrote in post #19324017 (external link)
As a newbie here, and an amateur/beginner, I am doing more surfing than posting. One thing I am finding is that there are a ton of broken links in the older posts and without a reference photo, the comments that are still up are useless. "could use more fill light on the left" left of what, there is no image left anymore. And it is impossible to tell from the title which posts have broken links. It can be discouraging to look through 30 posts and find only 3 or 4 that are still useful anymore. I know it would take a ton of time for the Mods to go through and clean up the old stuff, but it would make surfing more productive and would probably save a ton of data space.

A way to shorten your search is to click on the text “xx photos loaded” (top and bottom right of a page). A small window will open where you can see the thumbnails of the images on the page and which loaded, which didn’t. The window stays open when you move to another page in a thread.

Deleting old posts seems like a bad idea to me. This site is a repository of photographic knowledge, built by all those contributors - POTN’s members - over many years. You don’t just throw that away. You keep it and cherish it. And even without images, text may still be informative.

And those of us who have been here a while, we sometimes look for an old post. I know I do. When I suddenly remember something someone said a long time ago e.g. A comment, some advice, anything. Or I look in old posts to find information about a forum member who has disappeared from the board, see if I can find a clue as to why s/he is gone. See, you don’t know this, having just arrived here, but POTN is a community and as such you don’t just delete stuff because pics are missing. Some missing pics may be in posts of members who have passed away. I know a few. So please, don’t be so eager to change a forum you have just joined.


Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=19371752
Please QUOTE the comment to which you are responding!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

984 views & 4 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Suggestion from the new guy
FORUMS Forum FAQ and Information Forum Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1550 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.