Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 07 May 2022 (Saturday) 11:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Some Q's about monitors ?

 
strobe ­ monkey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,557 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 172
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Arizona
Post edited over 1 year ago by strobe monkey. (5 edits in all)
     
May 07, 2022 11:12 |  #1

I am in the market for a 27 inch monitor.

After a not so good experience using an Acer CP5271U for a few days, not very helpful chat and phone support, I returned it because it had a strong green bias (to my eyes) and colors were a little off (to my eyes again), I am now in search for the "sweet spot" monitor. One that is not very expensive but one that covers 100% sRGB.


I was comfortable with the native resolution on the above monitor with QHD, but I didn't see too much difference in image quality if I didn't look closely compared to my Dell U2412M.


I have a few questions so please bear with me.

1. Do I get QHD or 4K resolution ?
2. How does 4K scaling look like on 27 inch? Will everything get uncomfortably smaller especially the size of fonts in photo editing software?

After you have discussed the and made your points on the above, here is a question that will murky up the water - shall I get a 32 inch? You really don't need to answer it, as I'm set with a 27, but your input might sway me...

Thank you


R5, RF 85 f1.2L, RF 50 f1.8, 6D, EF16-35 F4L IS, EF50 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 L Macro IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bpalermini
Goldmember
Avatar
1,785 posts
Gallery: 197 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1285
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Ashland, Oregon
     
May 07, 2022 12:20 |  #2

I have a Dell P2715Q 27", 4K monitor it was a major improvement for me as I had been editing non a 15" MacBook screen before getting the Dell. I like everything about it except that they type in Lightroom controls gets small for my old eyes. I know there are adjustments I can make in the OS but I can't remember why it did not work for Lightroom. I am not home to test it again.

If I was buying a monitor now I would get a 32" 4K monitor.


Bob
R6II, R6, EF 16-35L II 2.8, EF 24-70L II 2.8, RF 50 1.8, EF 100L Macro 2.8, RF 70-200L 2.8, EF 100-400L II, EF 200-400L 4, EF 1.4xIII, EF 2xIII, 580EXII, YN560IV, RRS TVC23 + BH55, Fuji X-E2, Fuji X30, LRCC, PSCC
My Web Site (external link) | My Sports Portfolio (external link) | Instagram @bobpal

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4506
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 07, 2022 13:27 |  #3

A 4K monitor has 1.39x more pixels (3840) than my 2560x1440 27"IPS monitor that I have had for a number of years. I find that to be about the limit of shrinking text to not require scaling by the O/S display setup.
So I would choose 37" minimum diagonal measure if selecting a 4k monitor for computer use, so as to avoid the need for text scaling for readabililty.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,567 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
May 07, 2022 17:30 |  #4

Scaling for 4K depends on your OS and applications you use. At this point, I only have a couple older programs that don't support "highDPI" scaling. Windows 10 or 11 is pretty good about scaling them (if you adjust settings in the compatibility tab of that program's properties). Adobe apps have supported highDPI for awhile-with PC, it's limited if you have a license that's CS6 or below (but again, I find the new Windows scaling settings to do a pretty good job of scaling font and buttons). What I do like about 4K is that the denser pixel pitch makes it easier to see what's in focus and depth of field (I sit close enough to see it).


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chuckmiller
Goldmember
Avatar
4,178 posts
Gallery: 65 photos
Likes: 10540
Joined May 2012
Location: Lakeland, Florida
     
May 13, 2022 10:34 |  #5

This is my 27in monitor running at 4k (3840x2160). The scaling is set to the Windows recommended 150% (same in Win11 as it was in Win10). I opted for a 4k monitor over HD/QHD resolution so I could view full size images from my camera (6720 x 4480) with the least amount of zoom. A 32in monitor was beyond my budget but would require less text scaling to still be easy on the eyes. Google says 8k pixel dimensions are 8K: 7,680 x 4,320 = 33,177,600 pixels so it seems like an 8k 32in monitor would be ideal.

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52071179535_ddc3e38c38_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2nkm​pxv  (external link) 20220513_083226 (external link) by Chuck Miller (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52071179530_058e97f1a4_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2nkm​pxq  (external link) 20220513_083246 (external link) by Chuck Miller (external link), on Flickr

.
.
.
Retired from Fire/Rescue with 30 years on the job - January 2019

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4506
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 1 year ago by Wilt. (7 edits in all)
     
May 13, 2022 10:47 |  #6

chuckmiller wrote in post #19377560 (external link)
This is my 27in monitor running at 4k (3840x2160). The scaling is set to the Windows recommended 150% (same in Win11 as it was in Win10).



As I stated in post 3, 4K monitor has 40% more pixels than a 2560x1440 monitor, so a 4K monitor needs to be at least 40% larger, or the scaling of fonts will need to be at least 40% greater if the monitor size is the same, to retain same level readability. Your 150% scaling illustrates my point.

Extrapolating, 8K has 7580 pixels horizontally, vs. my 2560 pixels, 7580/2560=3 so for same readability as my 27" 2560x1440, the 8k monitor would need to be 23.5" (my 27" monitor's horizontal) * 3 = 70.5" ... got enough desk space?! :grin: or the O/S has to scale text 300% if same size monitor.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
strobe ­ monkey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,557 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 172
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Arizona
Post edited over 1 year ago by strobe monkey.
     
May 15, 2022 18:52 |  #7

Just a quick update. I have a Dell U2723QE [27" 4K] now that I'm calibrating... Scaling on Windows 10 works nicely.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2022/05/3/LQ_1158952.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1158952) © strobe monkey [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

R5, RF 85 f1.2L, RF 50 f1.8, 6D, EF16-35 F4L IS, EF50 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 L Macro IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chuckmiller
Goldmember
Avatar
4,178 posts
Gallery: 65 photos
Likes: 10540
Joined May 2012
Location: Lakeland, Florida
     
May 17, 2022 20:32 |  #8

Are you happy with it so far?


.
.
.
Retired from Fire/Rescue with 30 years on the job - January 2019

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
strobe ­ monkey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,557 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 172
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Arizona
Post edited over 1 year ago by strobe monkey.
     
May 22, 2022 17:22 as a reply to  @ chuckmiller's post |  #9

So far it's ok, nothing to brag about... color looks similar to my old Dell U2412M (to my eyes anyway)... only advantage of the new monitor is the resolution and size...


R5, RF 85 f1.2L, RF 50 f1.8, 6D, EF16-35 F4L IS, EF50 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 L Macro IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,405 views & 5 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Some Q's about monitors ?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
716 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.