Mark Sturtevant wrote in post #19390838
I agree that we should learn about the various post-processing tools. One does not need to simply accept what the camera gives you. I have used the tools for processing Raw photos in my ancient copy of Photoshop elements. But most times I simply convert the Raw images to a very large jPeg, and process those in Gimp which is what I know best. Its very similar to Photoshop, only its
free. My workflow in Gimp is so well known to me, I hardly have to think about it.
Then there is RawTherapee, which is an extremely powerful Raw photo editor, but it takes tutorials to learn how to do even basic things. Still, it too is free.
I agree..I have GIMP and use it from time to time and I tried RawTherapee in the past, but like you, I found it to not be very "user friendly" in my opinion. i also use AffinityPhoto at times.
I understand about the workflow being well known....I have been using Photoshop since 1998 or 1999, CameraRaw since it's release in I think 2003 and Bridge since it's release, around 05 or 06...so I am just more comfortable in those.
I do like to use the other available softwares to have a knowledge in case I don't have Adobe products available and some features in the other softwares are more to my liking. I try to pick up any useful info, tips, tricks, etc from whatever software that I can learn from or about to utilize and use in processing images. I owned a screenprinting/sign business for several years so I dabbled in several different types and brands of software. Learned little tips, workflows, etc from some software that I did not care for but it was useable or executable in other platforms...