Image hosted by forum (1191797) © A1original [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
A1original Goldmember  More info | Jan 05, 2023 08:23 | #3811 Image hosted by forum (1191797) © A1original [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Canon EOS R3| Canon RF 24-105L| RF 70-200 Lf/2.8| RF 50| RF 24-240| RF 100-400| RF 800 and a bunch of Canon L lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
A1original Goldmember More info | Jan 05, 2023 08:26 | #3812  Image hosted by forum (1191798) © A1original [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Canon EOS R3| Canon RF 24-105L| RF 70-200 Lf/2.8| RF 50| RF 24-240| RF 100-400| RF 800 and a bunch of Canon L lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TenaCJed Senior Member  More info Post edited 5 months ago by TenaCJed. (2 edits in all) | Jan 05, 2023 09:21 | #3813 digital paradise wrote in post #19463540  I know. I was a tad shallow. Like I said only 15 shots or so of wildlife. I took all types of shots of signs, car license plate, etc at all types of distances. All good. Even with with a really shallow DOF nothing was really in focus. I ran it through Topaz to give it a little clarity. I'm not concerned. It will be there. Original 
 Hosted photo: posted by digital paradise in ./showthread.php?p=19463540&i=i4978226 forum: Canon Digital Cameras 
Hosted photo: posted by digital paradise in ./showthread.php?p=19463540&i=i213172864 forum: Canon Digital Cameras Have you took some shots with a focus chart? To me that looks like back focus and if the R7 has focus adjust that can be corrected in camera for each lens. John W
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise "It takes a bit of work to get it in."  More info | Jan 05, 2023 09:23 | #3814 TenaCJed wrote in post #19463648 Have you took some shots with a focus chart? To me that looks like back focus and if the R7 has focus adjust that can be corrected in camera for each lens. I still of the 7D MII and I ran my lenses through focus chart to adjust the focus plane. ML bodies do not have Micro Focus adjustment. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise "It takes a bit of work to get it in." More info | Jan 05, 2023 13:52 | #3815 digital paradise wrote in post #19463649 ML bodies do not have Micro Focus adjustment. I should have said it's too early to determine anything. Could have been atmospheric distortion. I need to get out and shot more. My test Santa was about 25 ft away.  Image hosted by forum (1191829) © digital paradise [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.  Image hosted by forum (1191830) © digital paradise [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike-P Senior Member  More info | Jan 05, 2023 15:34 | #3816 digital paradise wrote in post #19463649 ML bodies do not have Micro Focus adjustment. Sony a9  Image hosted by forum (1191843) © Mike-P [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
biggles2002 Senior Member  More info Post edited 5 months ago by biggles2002. | The AF Micro Adjustment (AF Micro Adj.) function allows you to adjust and register an auto-focused position of an A-mount lens attached with the LA-EA2 or LA-EA4 mount adaptors. Canon EOS R5, Canon EOS R7
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise "It takes a bit of work to get it in." More info | Jan 05, 2023 15:48 | #3818 Mike-P wrote in post #19463780 Sony a9 
Hosted photo: posted by Mike-P in ./showthread.php?p=19463780&i=i82526475 forum: Canon Digital Cameras Well it is a Canon thread Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise "It takes a bit of work to get it in." More info | Jan 05, 2023 22:44 | #3819 Tomorrow I’ll do the 3 offset battery alignment test. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator  More info | Jan 06, 2023 03:21 | #3820 digital paradise wrote in post #19463540 I know. I was a tad shallow. Like I said only 15 shots or so of wildlife. I took all types of shots of signs, car license plate, etc at all types of distances. All good. Even with with a really shallow DOF nothing was really in focus. I ran it through Topaz to give it a little clarity. I'm not concerned. It will be there. Original
Hosted photo: posted by digital paradise in ./showthread.php?p=19463540&i=i4978226 forum: Canon Digital Cameras
Hosted photo: posted by digital paradise in ./showthread.php?p=19463540&i=i213172864 forum: Canon Digital Cameras It does look a bit back focussed, as you say the ear looks more in focus. My Photography Home Page
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2023 03:32 | #3821 Handheld...  Image hosted by forum (1191908) © VSS2011 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Age is a state of mind, and I don't.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise "It takes a bit of work to get it in." More info | Jan 06, 2023 08:11 | #3822 Lester Wareham wrote in post #19463941 It does look a bit back focussed, as you say the ear looks more in focus. I have not had this with the R7 + 100-500, it is either pin sharp or missed it. Were you in servo with a stationary subject? The focus box looks tight on the eye, subject tracking or classic focus point? The highlight of the eye seems sharp, but the fur around not. It the only example of the subject? Servo and subject tracking with eye AF. I took about 20 shots. I can post another lately. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator More info | Jan 06, 2023 08:43 | #3823 digital paradise wrote in post #19463987 Servo and subject tracking with eye AF. I took about 20 shots. I can post another lately. It would be interesting if you can see if there is any actual focus plane movement in later shots. My Photography Home Page
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LevinadeRuijter Bug Magnet  22,447 posts Gallery: 465 photos Best ofs: 12 Likes: 14789 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU More info | Jan 06, 2023 08:52 | #3824 Lester Wareham wrote in post #19463941 It does look a bit back focussed, as you say the ear looks more in focus. I have not had this with the R7 + 100-500, it is either pin sharp or missed it. Were you in servo with a stationary subject? The focus box looks tight on the eye, subject tracking or classic focus point? The highlight of the eye seems sharp, but the fur around not. It the only example of the subject? I think it’s important to realise that DPP only shows which focus point was used and not where it actually focused! So although it looks like the camera focused on the eye, that may not be the case. Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=19371752
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator More info | Jan 06, 2023 09:28 | #3825 Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #19464007 I think it’s important to realise that DPP only shows which focus point was used and not where it actually focused! So although it looks like the camera focused on the eye, that may not be the case. Exactly Levina, that was my point really, but said more directly. My Photography Home Page
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is senthilbaamboo 716 guests, 196 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
