Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 12 Aug 2022 (Friday) 17:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Optimal focal length

 
sierracharlie338
Senior Member
Avatar
301 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 583
Joined Aug 2022
Location: Texas
     
Aug 12, 2022 17:56 |  #1

Ok so here’s a question that is strictly opinion based. What is the optimal focal length for astrophotography?

I’m about to buy a prime lens to supplement my zoom lenses for Astro shots and curious what the masses say.

So let’s hear it 14, 20, 24, etc????

SC


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SailingAway
Senior Member
497 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 137
Joined Sep 2013
     
Aug 13, 2022 18:50 |  #2

I think that depends on the subjects you’re going for. There isn’t one lens to use for galaxies, nebula, planets/moon, sol, and the Milky Way.

The wider end of the focal lengths you listed, say 14-16mm, are commonly used for the Milky Way and nighttime landscapes. Getting wide is needed, the sky is big!


From the upper left corner of the U.S.
Photos, Video & Pano r us.
College and workshop instructor in video and audio.
70D, Sigma 8mm, Tokina f2.8 11-16, Canon EF-S f2.8 17-55, Sigma f2.8 50-150 EX OS, Tamron 150-600VC. Gigapan Epic Pro, Nodal Ninja 5 & R10.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sierracharlie338
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
301 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 583
Joined Aug 2022
Location: Texas
     
Aug 13, 2022 19:16 |  #3

SailingAway wrote in post #19415254 (external link)
I think that depends on the subjects you’re going for. There isn’t one lens to use for galaxies, nebula, planets/moon, sol, and the Milky Way.

The wider end of the focal lengths you listed, say 14-16mm, are commonly used for the Milky Way and nighttime landscapes. Getting wide is needed, the sky is big!

Thanks for the reply I should have been a little more clear but the wife was nagging at me when I posted that....

Nighttime landscapes is mainly what I am referring to and not so much planet, moon type shots.

SC


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Aug 24, 2022 07:35 |  #4

The answer still mostly stands, it depends on how wide a view you want. There are big differences at small focal length changes at the wide end, ie. 14mm provides a very different view than 20mm for example.

There isn't an optimal focal length, and there isn't an optimal brand of lens either. There are good Sigma, Canon, etc lenses at the wide end (10mm, 12mm, 14mm, etc) that will work.

I think as a general suggestion, you want to stay in the 10-16mm range, and then look at the reviews of which lenses receive praise that work in that range, then look at budget last.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sierracharlie338
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
301 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 583
Joined Aug 2022
Location: Texas
     
Aug 24, 2022 07:48 |  #5

TeamSpeed wrote in post #19418942 (external link)
The answer still mostly stands, it depends on how wide a view you want. There are big differences at small focal length changes at the wide end, ie. 14mm provides a very different view than 20mm for example.

There isn't an optimal focal length, and there isn't an optimal brand of lens either. There are good Sigma, Canon, etc lenses at the wide end (10mm, 12mm, 14mm, etc) that will work.

I think as a general suggestion, you want to stay in the 10-16mm range, and then look at the reviews of which lenses receive praise that work in that range, then look at budget last.

Thanks for the reply! I’m clear on the differences in specs of gear and that there is no one size fits all lens. I was rather looking for a persons specific opinion on what would be the best based on their experience and maybe a why to go along with it. I wasn’t considering as low as ten originally but will definitely look into it now.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Aug 24, 2022 09:30 |  #6

There aren't too many full frame options below 12mm, but there are more for APS-C.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

654 views & 4 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Optimal focal length
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1235 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.