Aug 31, 2022 12:38 | #1 I have opened a case with Canon. I sent this to them to open the case. Has anyone had this experience? Canon 30D | Canon 7D | Canon R6 |Sony α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Sony E 3.5-5.6/PZ 16-50 OSS | Sigma DC 17-70mm | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM |Canon EF24-105mm f/4L IS USM | Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Aug 31, 2022 13:30 | #2 tmwhitm wrote in post #19421176  I have opened a case with Canon. I sent this to them to open the case. Has anyone had this experience? Canon, when R6 is in manual, auto WB, Auto ISO, it seems that when the ISO is 100 (auto) I will have to Manually adjust the shutter or Aperture setting for exposure compensation instead of the camera adjusting the ISO higher, it will stay at 100. Am I missing a setting somewhere? I did not have this issue with my 7D MK II. Thank you, Tom What are the conditions you are shooting under when this happens? It *sounds* like you're shooting in too bright of conditions and the camera cannot go any lower on ISO to compensate; meaning you have to adjust one or both of the other two to lower your exposure. - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
There may be merit in your suggestion, ha! Of course there is … lol I mean no disrespect. I was shooting as the sun was going down over the trees, 1/2 way below across a swamp into the sun. I was thinking myself that the ISO wanted to go down to 50 but my Low threshold is 100. I don’t ever recall having this issue with my 7D MK II, this is my first full frame. Could there be a difference between the two cameras in this respect? Canon 30D | Canon 7D | Canon R6 |Sony α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Sony E 3.5-5.6/PZ 16-50 OSS | Sigma DC 17-70mm | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM |Canon EF24-105mm f/4L IS USM | Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark, Canon 30D | Canon 7D | Canon R6 |Sony α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Sony E 3.5-5.6/PZ 16-50 OSS | Sigma DC 17-70mm | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM |Canon EF24-105mm f/4L IS USM | Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Aug 31, 2022 16:59 | #5 tmwhitm wrote in post #19421223 Snydremark, Thank you. You hit the nail on the head. I set the minimum ISO to 400 and got the same results when it bottomed out, wanted to go lower. I am not sure why I have not experienced this before on my 7D MK II, probably just the photographer glitching. Thanks again. Glad it helped - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1458 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
That's why I keep what's in my sig; it reminds me to check my self at the same time I'm checking my gear for errors 
It's possible that you just didn't shoot precisely the same type of image, or maybe you're using a different metering method that acted more in your favor on the 7DII. I've never set limits on Auto ISO w/ the 7DII, 5DIV or R5, so I don't know whether they handle those settings differently; but, the metering should be relatively close assuming same metering mode, subject, light, etc.