Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 04 Nov 2022 (Friday) 12:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

digiKam Discussion

 
BuckSkin
Senior Member
847 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Nov 2014
     
Nov 04, 2022 12:50 |  #1

Any digiKam users here besides me ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tropicaltuna
Junior Member
27 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2009
     
Aug 09, 2023 06:26 |  #2

Installed digiKam yesterday after I got annoyed by Adobe Bridge's slowness and lack customization (e.g. shortcuts) options. Main usage is for culling purposes, but having might utilize also tagging etc. features so I would find something even after the culling (backlog of around 12 years :-)).

Only 30 min experience so far (I might have tried this around 10 years ago), but liking it. Seems faster and UI is polished enough to enjoy tedious culling process.



Canon 60D
Canon EF-S 17-55mm 2.8 USM, Tamron SP AF 90 2.8 Di Macro
Canon 70-300 3.5-5.6 USM, Canon 18-135 3.5-5.6, Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II
Nissin Digital Di622 Mark II Flash, Manfrotto Modo 785B tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BuckSkin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
847 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Nov 2014
     
Aug 09, 2023 06:54 |  #3

Tropicaltuna wrote in post #19549153 (external link)
Main usage is for culling purposes,

You will find that nobody nowhere has a better, more solid, Keyword Tag handling ability than digiKam; plus, all the various flag-tagging options.

Are you on a Windows machine ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tropicaltuna
Junior Member
27 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2009
     
Aug 09, 2023 08:20 as a reply to  @ BuckSkin's post |  #4

Yes, I am. For RAW editing purposes - which I will connect to digiKam - I have bought DxO Lab 3 in 2019 and upgraded to 5 in 2021. Maybe this is finally the year where I postprocess my first picture :-D.

Are the tags included as metadata, i.e. I will see all tags I do also on capable other software?



Canon 60D
Canon EF-S 17-55mm 2.8 USM, Tamron SP AF 90 2.8 Di Macro
Canon 70-300 3.5-5.6 USM, Canon 18-135 3.5-5.6, Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II
Nissin Digital Di622 Mark II Flash, Manfrotto Modo 785B tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BuckSkin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
847 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Nov 2014
     
Aug 09, 2023 09:28 |  #5

Tropicaltuna wrote in post #19549181 (external link)
Are the tags included as metadata, i.e. I will see all tags I do also on capable other software?

You set that up in Settings > Configure digiKam > Metadata(I think)

You have the choice of Keyword Tags being in database or written into the file; I keep mine set to written in the file.

Sometimes, after writing tags in digiKam, some other program will come along and strip them away = if I catch it before anything else is done, I select the affected files in digiKam and do Item > Write Metadata to File(s) and digiKam will replace the lost data --- so long as the data is in digiKam's database.(don't get mixed up and do ReRead Metadata from File)

There is a switch somewhere in Settings that you will need turn ON in order for digiKam to write to RAW files; some are safe to write to and others not; so, you need to investigate this before you write to RAW files.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tropicaltuna
Junior Member
27 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2009
     
Aug 09, 2023 14:08 as a reply to  @ BuckSkin's post |  #6

Thanks - I will take a look and keep your comments in mind.

Minor thing, but it seems I can't replicate a filmstrip view from Adobe Bridge in digiKam since "Preview" doesn't allow any modification to layout (so thumbnails are on top and not below selected picture) but nevertheless the interface is quite nice and allows a fast workflow.



Canon 60D
Canon EF-S 17-55mm 2.8 USM, Tamron SP AF 90 2.8 Di Macro
Canon 70-300 3.5-5.6 USM, Canon 18-135 3.5-5.6, Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II
Nissin Digital Di622 Mark II Flash, Manfrotto Modo 785B tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tropicaltuna
Junior Member
27 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2009
     
Aug 10, 2023 01:36 |  #7

BuckSkin wrote in post #19549205 (external link)
There is a switch somewhere in Settings that you will need turn ON in order for digiKam to write to RAW files; some are safe to write to and others not; so, you need to investigate this before you write to RAW files.

Any hint where I can investigate properly if it is safe to write to my RAW files? Is camera model or just manufacturer/RAW format important? I have shot RAW files with Canon 450D and Canon 60D + have a couple of Nikon RAW files.

Based on this interesting discussion https://www.dpreview.c​om/forums/thread/45036​94 (external link) it doesn't matter by manufacturer, but it is just a (minor) risk a user should consider when writing directly to RAW files instead of using XMP.



Canon 60D
Canon EF-S 17-55mm 2.8 USM, Tamron SP AF 90 2.8 Di Macro
Canon 70-300 3.5-5.6 USM, Canon 18-135 3.5-5.6, Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II
Nissin Digital Di622 Mark II Flash, Manfrotto Modo 785B tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BuckSkin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
847 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Nov 2014
     
Aug 10, 2023 03:26 |  #8

Tropicaltuna wrote in post #19549448 (external link)
Any hint where I can investigate properly if it is safe to write to my RAW files? Is camera model or just manufacturer/RAW format important? I have shot RAW files with Canon 450D and Canon 60D + have a couple of Nikon RAW files.

Based on this interesting discussion https://www.dpreview.c​om/forums/thread/45036​94 (external link) it doesn't matter by manufacturer, but it is just a (minor) risk a user should consider when writing directly to RAW files instead of using XMP.

I would practice with some of those blurry shots of the toe of your boot or the back of that ladies head that popped up just as soon as the shutter clicked; be sure to set digiKam to write the info to the file; add a bunch of Keyword Tags and then thoroughly investigate the outcome.

If anything went South, it will corrupt the image info in the files and make them appear weird, like with bars or blocks or stripes or something.

With Canon CR2 files, you should be safe --- but try a few samples first.

I can't speak for the Nikon, but probably safe as well.

A good place to ask about RAW file compatibility (or any digiKam questions that I can't answer) is HERE (external link)

I have real good results writing data of all types in Canon CR2 files by using FREE exifToolGUI (external link) = once you get it figured out, it is really quick and simple to use.

To write heirarchical Keyword Tags in ExifToolGUI, I first write their heirarchy on a notepad txt document and add them all together like thus:

Animal/Big Animal/Big Wooly Mean Animal/Bear*Vehicle/Tr​uck/Big Truck/Peterbilt/Peterb​ilt W900*People/Women/Wome​n over 600lbs/Cousin Jill

The / denotes the heirarchy = Parent Tag/Sub-Tag/Sub-Sub-Tag/etc.

The * separates the tags.

I put this all together on a txt document and then copy/paste it in the appropriate field in ExifToolGUI

It sounds a lot more complicated than it is.

That being said, if digiKam will safely write your information in your brand of RAW files, then it is the quicker/better way to do so.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tropicaltuna
Junior Member
27 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2009
     
Aug 10, 2023 03:37 as a reply to  @ BuckSkin's post |  #9

Big thanks to your thorough reply. I will check and try both approaches.



Canon 60D
Canon EF-S 17-55mm 2.8 USM, Tamron SP AF 90 2.8 Di Macro
Canon 70-300 3.5-5.6 USM, Canon 18-135 3.5-5.6, Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II
Nissin Digital Di622 Mark II Flash, Manfrotto Modo 785B tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,146 views & 3 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it and it is followed by 6 members.
digiKam Discussion
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1047 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.