^ Very nice picture
The 15 is very useful and significantly wider than the 18
Therefore i prefer the 15 85 over the 18 135
Nov 19, 2022 13:36 | #16 ^ Very nice picture _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amfoto1 Cream of the Crop 10,331 posts Likes: 146 Joined Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, California More info Post edited 10 months ago by amfoto1. (2 edits in all) | Nov 25, 2022 13:53 | #17 Since you will be going from APS-C to full frame camera, you will need to replace the lens, too. Alan Myers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 25, 2022 17:16 | #18 Thank you all for your responses. For now, it looks like I'll hold on to the 550D along with the 15-85 lens since I'm already going to be buying a telephoto when I buy the R6 Mark II. I'll use the 15-85 on the 550D more for wider angle shots that I wouldn't be able to get with the telephoto on the other camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Nov 25, 2022 17:29 | #19 Why not get the R7? Zero compromises on resolution, and you actually get substantially more resolution over the 55D. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sickforska Member 30 posts Likes: 32 Joined Nov 2007 More info | Nov 26, 2022 16:35 | #20 What is the crop factor on Ef-s to rf? Have a decent Macro lens that I haven’t been able to use after swapping to an ef mount.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
msowsun "approx 8mm" More info | Nov 26, 2022 17:07 | #21 sickforska wrote in post #19450470 What is the crop factor on Ef-s to rf? Have a decent Macro lens that I haven’t been able to use after swapping to an ef mount. If you have a full frame EF Macro lens, and adapt it to an RF full frame body, there is no crop factor. Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amfoto1 Cream of the Crop 10,331 posts Likes: 146 Joined Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, California More info Post edited 10 months ago by amfoto1. (2 edits in all) | Nov 26, 2022 22:44 | #22 TeamSpeed wrote in post #19450171 Why not get the R7? Zero compromises on resolution, and you actually get substantially more resolution over the 55D. This makes a lot of sense. Alan Myers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1377 guests, 181 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||