[removed]
Jamesino Senior Member 484 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2008 More info Post edited 5 months ago by Jamesino. (2 edits in all) | May 11, 2023 12:29 | #1 [removed]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amfoto1 Cream of the Crop 10,331 posts Likes: 146 Joined Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, California More info | May 13, 2023 14:11 | #2 According to https://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0 Alan Myers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1381 guests, 180 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
, what you are seeing seems pretty typical. With both set to 70mm and wide open aperture, the 24-70mm wide open is a bit softer than the 70-200mm. At the center of the image, there isn't much difference....there is some difference mid-frame and quite a bit of difference in the extreme corners.