Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 29 Mar 2006 (Wednesday) 21:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What does "corrected perspective" look like?

 
Meaty0
Goldmember
Avatar
3,519 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Mar 29, 2006 21:55 |  #1

I took this at sunset up at the local church on the hill. I'm guessing it needs perspective correction. Since I'm just learning about this, I'm not sure what it's supposed to look like once it's "corrected". Could someone kindly correct the image so I know what to aim for?

Thanks for the help everyone.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbkalla
Goldmember
Avatar
2,831 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Elizabeth, Colorado, USA
     
Mar 29, 2006 21:58 |  #2

I don't think you'll want to correct this one. I like it the way it is. :-)


John
flickr (external link) | G+ (external link) | Panoramio (external link) | InterfaceLIFT (external link)
Fujifilm X-T2
| 10-24 f4 R OIS | 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | XF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR | 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR | 56mm f/1.2 R | 27mm f/2.8 Pancake |  Retina iMac & MBP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbkalla
Goldmember
Avatar
2,831 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Elizabeth, Colorado, USA
     
Mar 29, 2006 21:59 |  #3

I think normally you correct the perspective to make a building look "right." At this angle and this close, it won't look right when corrected, I think...


John
flickr (external link) | G+ (external link) | Panoramio (external link) | InterfaceLIFT (external link)
Fujifilm X-T2
| 10-24 f4 R OIS | 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | XF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR | 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR | 56mm f/1.2 R | 27mm f/2.8 Pancake |  Retina iMac & MBP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sugarzebra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,289 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
     
Mar 29, 2006 22:13 |  #4

I agree, the perspective here is right for this picture


Scott

Website & Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbkalla
Goldmember
Avatar
2,831 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Elizabeth, Colorado, USA
     
Mar 29, 2006 22:39 |  #5

But maybe he just wanted somebody to correct it so he could learn/see the process. I understand that. I wish I could help, but I'm hoping to learn, also! I have the tools with CS2, but I've never used that one. Anyone?


John
flickr (external link) | G+ (external link) | Panoramio (external link) | InterfaceLIFT (external link)
Fujifilm X-T2
| 10-24 f4 R OIS | 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | XF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR | 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR | 56mm f/1.2 R | 27mm f/2.8 Pancake |  Retina iMac & MBP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sugarzebra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,289 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
     
Mar 29, 2006 22:40 |  #6

Here's an example where the perspective needs to be changed (Philadelphia City Hall) Please excuse the poor exposure....I was just looking for a sample;)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Scott

Website & Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sugarzebra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,289 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
     
Mar 29, 2006 22:44 |  #7

The above was done quickly, and created too much distortion in the city hall building. This can be fixed in PS (using the pinch option in the distortion filter would probably work)


Scott

Website & Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbkalla
Goldmember
Avatar
2,831 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Elizabeth, Colorado, USA
     
Mar 29, 2006 22:51 |  #8

Wow. That was impressive!


John
flickr (external link) | G+ (external link) | Panoramio (external link) | InterfaceLIFT (external link)
Fujifilm X-T2
| 10-24 f4 R OIS | 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | XF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR | 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR | 56mm f/1.2 R | 27mm f/2.8 Pancake |  Retina iMac & MBP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Meaty0
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,519 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Mar 29, 2006 23:42 |  #9

AHAaaa! So the trick is knowing what NEEDS correction in the first place?

Thanks for that fine example. Do perspective problems normally occur only with wide-angle lenses like we used for our pictures in this thread (17mm for mine)? I've been looking through some old film pix of mine and found a couple (of a church too) that turned out weird looking with a 50mm lens.

Paul



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sugarzebra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,289 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
     
Mar 29, 2006 23:58 |  #10

Hi Paul,
The shorter the focal length the greater the distortion, which always seems to create a problem for cityscapes, where you tend to use wide angle lens' and want nice vertical edges on the buildings! I believe I was using the kit lens on the above sample, so it was probably taken at ~17-20mm. The perspective can be changed with the transform tool in PS and its actually quite easy to do.


Scott

Website & Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 30, 2006 00:06 as a reply to  @ jbkalla's post |  #11

jbkalla wrote:
I think normally you correct the perspective to make a building look "right." At this angle and this close, it won't look right when corrected, I think...

You can correct the perspective, but you will lose most of the image and end up with a nice picture of a bunch of bricks :D


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beachgirl
Goldmember
Avatar
1,099 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay)
     
Mar 30, 2006 11:29 as a reply to  @ jbkalla's post |  #12

jbkalla wrote:
I don't think you'll want to correct this one. I like it the way it is. :-)

Hi Meaty0, Cool shot. Don't change it;)
BG.




http://pinksandcastle.​smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Mar 30, 2006 21:43 |  #13

As SugarZebra pointed out, the shorter the focal length the bigger the problem.

However, the real rule to remember is ultra simple, and it applies also to wide angle lenses but not fisheye lenses.

The rule is to never tilt the camera up or down - it must point directly at the horizon in order to avoid "converging verticals".


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,171 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
What does "corrected perspective" look like?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1585 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.