Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 30 May 2023 (Tuesday) 21:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Advantages of full frame over crop for macro?

 
AlbertD
Member
78 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Feb 2019
Location: Bremerton, WA USA
     
May 30, 2023 21:18 |  #1

I have a Canon R7 crop sensor and an R8 full frame. I have just ordered the Canon 100mm f2.8 L macro lens. Does one camera have an advantage over the other? I know the R7 has the 1.6 crop factor but the R8 has better low light capability and is high enough resolution to do some cropping during editing.

I'll of course do my own experimenting as I learn macro. I hope to have images worth contributing to the forum by the end of summer. I've been looking at all the great images here and have been really inspired.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited 5 months ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all)
     
May 30, 2023 21:59 |  #2

If 'macro' is the classic definition (image at reproduction ratio > [1:3] of subject size) the larger frame captures a larger subject...e.g. a 22x34mm subject fits into the 24x36mm frame at 1:1, but cannot entirely fit the 15x22mm frame at 1:1

But if 'macro' means today's loose definition for 'macro' of 'fit a close up subject into the frame', the R7 frame puts 6960 pixels across the long dimension of the frame, while the R8 only puts 6000 pixels across the long dimension of the frame...so the R7 puts more pixels on the same amount of subject. And the Working Distance with same lens is longer on the R7, simply because the reproduction ratio (size on sensor) is lower on the smaller frame.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlbertD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
78 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Feb 2019
Location: Bremerton, WA USA
     
May 31, 2023 21:15 |  #3

Wilt wrote in post #19524888 (external link)
If 'macro' is the classic definition (image at reproduction ratio > [1:3] of subject size) the larger frame captures a larger subject...e.g. a 22x34mm subject fits into the 24x36mm frame at 1:1, but cannot entirely fit the 15x22mm frame at 1:1

But if 'macro' means today's loose definition for 'macro' of 'fit a close up subject into the frame', the R7 frame puts 6960 pixels across the long dimension of the frame, while the R8 only puts 6000 pixels across the long dimension of the frame...so the R7 puts more pixels on the same amount of subject. And the Working Distance with same lens is longer on the R7, simply because the reproduction ratio (size on sensor) is lower on the smaller frame.

Thank you Wilt. I should have my new lens early next week. It has a 1.4:1 ratio. If I understand what you are saying correctly the crop sensor camera should work really well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
May 31, 2023 21:51 |  #4

It seems to be a guideline that apsc are a bit better for macros.

Now if you want more magnification without breaking the bank and keep using the 100L, take a look at the NISI close up filter, it has been awesome with my setup.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlbertD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
78 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Feb 2019
Location: Bremerton, WA USA
     
May 31, 2023 22:26 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #5

I might try the close up filter eventually. I may try extension tubes too. For now I'll be learning with the macro lens by itself so I can learn the basics. I also got a flash diffuser and have plenty of insects in the yard to model for me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aezoss
Senior Member
859 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Likes: 3501
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Great White North
     
Jun 01, 2023 02:26 |  #6

I alternate between 5D3 & 7D2 for macro. The 5D3 does better in low light but I like the smaller 7D2 sensor for tiny flowers. Less cropping, equally good results in decent light.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlbertD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
78 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Feb 2019
Location: Bremerton, WA USA
     
Jun 01, 2023 21:09 |  #7

aezoss wrote in post #19525253 (external link)
I alternate between 5D3 & 7D2 for macro. The 5D3 does better in low light but I like the smaller 7D2 sensor for tiny flowers. Less cropping, equally good results in decent light.

I will definitely be trying both and learning what works best in different conditions. I live in the Pacific Northwest with a lot of heavily wooded areas and the rainforest on the Olympic peninsula. It can be pretty dark in the trees. It's going to be fun seeing the variety of insects and other things we have to photograph. Before I took up photography I never really paid much attention to it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Out buying Wheaties
Avatar
7,484 posts
Gallery: 64 photos
Likes: 1087
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Jun 01, 2023 21:59 as a reply to  @ AlbertD's post |  #8

100L should be enough. Use stabilisation and AI Servo. Once camera is locked on the bug, AI Servo will compensate bug's and yours movement.


M-E and ME blog (external link). Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited 5 months ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 01, 2023 22:17 |  #9

AI Servo may not be enough. I have tried that enough times, and now just use manual focus (ie moving back and forth). It depends on the situation, insects on stable surfaces, yes, insects on branches/flowers, no.

This is where mirrorless focus peaking works wonders.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlbertD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
78 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Feb 2019
Location: Bremerton, WA USA
     
Jun 05, 2023 16:56 |  #10

TeamSpeed wrote in post #19525556 (external link)
AI Servo may not be enough. I have tried that enough times, and now just use manual focus (ie moving back and forth). It depends on the situation, insects on stable surfaces, yes, insects on branches/flowers, no.

This is where mirrorless focus peaking works wonders.

I just literally found focus peaking on my cameras 2 days ago. It looks like a great way to focus on macro subjects. My new lens will be here tomorrow then the fun begins.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlbertD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
78 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Feb 2019
Location: Bremerton, WA USA
     
Jun 05, 2023 16:59 |  #11

kf095 wrote in post #19525551 (external link)
100L should be enough. Use stabilisation and AI Servo. Once camera is locked on the bug, AI Servo will compensate bug's and yours movement.

I have to work on approaching the bugs too. They can be really shy. I have read that it might be easier early in the morning when it's cooler and they are not fully active yet.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

578 views & 7 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Advantages of full frame over crop for macro?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1472 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.