Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 23 Jun 2023 (Friday) 18:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Any tips on how to restore this

 
skeeeter56
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Jun 2023
     
Jun 23, 2023 18:15 |  #1

IS there anything that can be done to improve this.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2023/06/4/LQ_1215525.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1215525) © skeeeter56 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jun 23, 2023 21:00 |  #2

Do you have the original print, or only this scan?


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skeeeter56
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Jun 2023
     
Jun 23, 2023 23:29 as a reply to  @ Damo77's post |  #3

Only this scan, which I think is of a slide. I may have the slide unsure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,681 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16806
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jun 24, 2023 07:28 |  #4

Topaz Photo AI perhaps but it is pretty expensive. Maybe someone you know has it?


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jun 25, 2023 04:18 |  #5

skeeeter56 wrote in post #19533526 (external link)
Only this scan, which I think is of a slide. I may have the slide unsure.

You HAVE to find the slide. You need to get a better scan of it than this.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,720 posts
Likes: 4045
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 25, 2023 06:50 |  #6

There are a few things you can do such as remove the color cast, color balance properly, adjust the contrast, recover whatever you can from the highlights and shadows but the highlights are pretty well blown and you can't recover what's not there. ZYou can make it look a bit better but the best option is find the original and start with a decent scan.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
*Scruffy*
Member
77 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2022
     
Jun 25, 2023 14:24 |  #7

As said everywhere above if you can get the original re-scan it.

That said and if this is all you have at this resolution there's not a whole lot you can do.

Because it was originally a slide it will have its own colour characteristics and casts, and with the limited data available, just setting a white point will probably not suffice.

Depending on your software I'd recommend applying any available film styles you may have to see if one of those will get you a colour balance you like. Otherwise you'll have to work on colour balancing different ranges separately which would be a pain. At that point were it me I'd probably convert it to Black and White (Greyscale). Maybe even re-colouring after the fact.

Then depending on your software you may want to play with Clarity and Vibrance, and if you have photoshop you could try Hi-Pass sharpening and/or frequency separation.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skeeeter56
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Jun 2023
     
Jun 25, 2023 15:16 as a reply to  @ *Scruffy*'s post |  #8

I have found a better version

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2023/06/4/LQ_1215804.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1215804) © skeeeter56 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,720 posts
Likes: 4045
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 25, 2023 16:35 |  #9

*Scruffy* wrote in post #19534081 (external link)
As said everywhere above if you can get the original re-scan it.

That said and if this is all you have at this resolution there's not a whole lot you can do.

Because it was originally a slide it will have its own colour characteristics and casts, and with the limited data available, just setting a white point will probably not suffice.

Depending on your software I'd recommend applying any available film styles you may have to see if one of those will get you a colour balance you like. Otherwise you'll have to work on colour balancing different ranges separately which would be a pain. At that point were it me I'd probably convert it to Black and White (Greyscale). Maybe even re-colouring after the fact.

Then depending on your software you may want to play with Clarity and Vibrance, and if you have photoshop you could try Hi-Pass sharpening and/or frequency separation.

There is a quick and dirty way to remove color cast without guessing. It works great on film where the whole image has a p[articular color profile. I tried it on the above photo and it did pretty well. Try this, these are the steps for PS but should work with any photo editor though the tools might be in different locations.
1. Open photo and duplicate two new layers. You now have three identical layers. This lets you keep the original untouched so you can compare with it. You'll only be working with layer 2 and layer 3.
2. on the third layer, use the "Blur" filter and select "Average". The layer will turn all one color, the average of the whole picture.
3. Under "Image" select "Adjustments" then "Invert. You now have the opposite of the average color of the whole picture.
Under "the "Adjustments" window, blend using "Color" and change it's Opacity to about %50.
4. Merge the 2 layers. Then bump up the saturation until it looks good.

The color cast should be gone. You can check by flipping between the original and the processed.

You can also play with Auto tone and Auto Color. They do pretty good job sometimes but have trouble if there is a color cast over the whole image.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,720 posts
Likes: 4045
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 25, 2023 16:36 |  #10

skeeeter56 wrote in post #19534108 (external link)
I have found a better version
Hosted photo: posted by skeeeter56 in
./showthread.php?p=195​34108&i=i254588505
forum: RAW, Post Processing & Printing

That's very workable. :)


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,597 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1542
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Jun 26, 2023 12:46 |  #11

skeeeter56 wrote in post #19534108 (external link)
I have found a better version
Hosted photo: posted by skeeeter56 in
./showthread.php?p=195​34108&i=i254588505
forum: RAW, Post Processing & Printing

This image is perfectly fine - so the question now becomes, what do you believe you need to do to "restore" this image? What is the intended end goal? Print output?

The color cast is retro and somewhat nostalgic, so maybe there is no point to "correcting" it. The image quality is pretty terrific. Maybe you might want to lift the shadows slightly, but that is a matter of taste as well.

K


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

776 views & 1 like for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
Any tips on how to restore this
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1228 guests, 180 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.