Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 04 Jul 2023 (Tuesday) 08:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5DS vs R5

 
kbColorado
Goldmember
Avatar
1,386 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1590
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 04, 2023 08:35 |  #1

Recently had my gear stolen and am researching replacement. Had an R6 and will be replacing that one. Great camera for event shooting.

Had a 5DS for those sharpity sharp landsapes. Was wondering how the sensors compare between the 5DS and R5 with this in mind. One advantage to getting the R5 is I could replace my stolen lenses with RF models (24-70, 100 macro, 70-200) and not need the adaptor, but I loved working with those 5DS files!


Paul
deep greens and blues are the colors I choose ...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anglefire
Senior Member
Avatar
903 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3074
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK
     
Jul 07, 2023 04:45 |  #2

I've not had the 5DS - but have the R5 - and the files are really good to work with - 45Mp is a good size - did a trip to Morocco at Easter and took 7500 shots and whilst most are just snap shots, some have come out special (IMHO!)


Mark
My Website (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
premature adulation
2,668 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 645
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Jul 07, 2023 07:10 |  #3

I've used neither model, but based on the fact the 5DS dates from the "era" around the 5D3, and the R5 is after/better than the 5D4, I'd assume the sensor on the R5 will be way better for landscape work.

Dynamic range at low ISO is much better (https://www.photonstop​hotos.net …OS%205DS,Canon%​20EOS%20R5 (external link)) and I understand that visible sensor noise is qualitatively improved from around the 7D2 onwards. Certainly the 5D4 was a significant quality step over the 5D3, so I'd assume the R5 might be as big a step from the 5DS.


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kbColorado
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,386 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1590
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 07, 2023 08:56 |  #4

Thanks for the replies.

The 5DS sensor is a completely different animal from the 5D MK II, III, IV and is similar in resolution to the R5. I was hoping to get a comparison in dynamic range and low light performance.


Cheers


Paul
deep greens and blues are the colors I choose ...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jul 07, 2023 09:26 |  #5

kbColorado wrote in post #19537909 (external link)
Thanks for the replies.

The 5DS sensor is a completely different animal from the 5D MK II, III, IV and is similar in resolution to the R5. I was hoping to get a comparison in dynamic range and low light performance.


Cheers

Though the 5DS sensor is completely different from the 5DII and 5DIII, the technology is not. With the 5DIV, the sensor technology was significantly improved and you see it in the R series cameras. As mentioned, the low ISO DR has improved and the quality of the noise. If your replacing, I would definitly replace with the newer tech.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paddler4
Goldmember
Avatar
1,438 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 07, 2023 10:41 |  #6

kbColorado wrote in post #19537909 (external link)
Thanks for the replies.

The 5DS sensor is a completely different animal from the 5D MK II, III, IV and is similar in resolution to the R5. I was hoping to get a comparison in dynamic range and low light performance.


Cheers

The link posted by sploo has a comparison of dynamic range. The R5 is better by two full stops at base ISO, but the two converge at higher ISOs.


Check out my photos at http://dkoretz.smugmug​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

440 views & 4 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it and it is followed by 6 members.
5DS vs R5
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1461 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.