Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Urban Life & Travel 
Thread started 31 Aug 2023 (Thursday) 14:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

city scapes, kids and karens

 
Ltdave
it looks like im post #19,016
Avatar
5,671 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 8511
Joined Apr 2012
Location: the farthest point east in michigan
     
Aug 31, 2023 14:53 |  #1

ive been trying to get back to the roots of photography for me which actually is going back to the seeds; i.e. pre-roots, with old slow, meter-less, film cameras in the form of medium and large format (okay im cheating on the large format. i just picked up a 1955 vintage Crown Graphic in 4x5 and running a 6x7 film back on it)

i shot some stuff with my YashicaMat 124G and shared the black and white images in a couple of other threads.

today i took my Speed Graphic downtown with the tripod and Weston Master III light meter. the range finder doesnt appear to be working properly so it entails using the focusing glass, then removing the graflok back and inserting the roll-film back. setting the camera's exposure, taking the picture and then swapping back to the ground glass for the next image. kind of contrary to the "speed" part of Speed Graphic.

so i stopped across the street from the city's municipal theater/auditorium that has a beautiful limestone front with a fountain and gold clock on its face. because of the crop factor of 6x7cm film in a 4x5in camera the lens acts like a 234mm lens (more or less). im in front of another iconic place in town (a bar) and im setting up the camera. working the settings, framing, metering blah blah blah.

out comes some woman and demands to know what im taking pictures of. i reply McMorran (the auditorium). in the past couple of years the city decided to make it a green space out front with astro-turf and a small stage with a canopy and on the other end of the frontage, some big adirondack chairs and a small splash pad. well as luck would have it there were 3-4 KIDS playing in the water at the splash pad.

when i told her i was shooting the auditorium, she said "but there are kids over there." "Good, i hope theyre enjoying the water."

"you cant take pictures of those kids". "I'm NOT taking pictures of the kids. im shooting the auditorium and the fountains" (they would have been in the lower left corner of the image on 4x5, and mostly obscured by hedges and other stuff out front along the street)

"year but there are kids over there" "theyre NOT in the image im going to make. in fact ill be lucky if most of the auditorium is in the picture."

"i dont want you taking pictures of those kids. youre an adult." i start dismantling the roll-film back and setting the camera to lock open the shutter and adjust the aperture, put the ground glass back in and tell her "come here." i show her the film back and the 6x7 opening, then tell her to look through the camera back. i explain to her that "the only thing thats going to be in the picture is this small center section of the image and none of the kids will be in the picture."

i get it, the whole creeper thing with kids but ive been doing this a long long time. a) there is nothing to prevent me from shooting anything that can be seen in public without going to extreme measures to see. like using a ladder to see over a hedge or bush. or over a fence. etc. b) i understand people dont know jack squat about photography other than what they see/post on facebook or insta c) i really wanted to tell her that if she thought what i was doing was creepy or illegal, shut off facebook on her phone and call the police...

my only first time dealing with this crap but it was pretty annoying...

here is a previous photo of the auditorium. the stairs and sidewalk are gone, now at ground level. the gravel area and picnic tables are gone as is the low brick wall and flowers.

the second picture is from the south end of the plaza at the edge of the splash pad

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2023/08/5/LQ_1224400.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1224400) © Ltdave [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2023/08/5/LQ_1224401.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1224401) © Ltdave [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

-im just trying. sometimes i succeed

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ltdave
THREAD ­ STARTER
it looks like im post #19,016
Avatar
5,671 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 8511
Joined Apr 2012
Location: the farthest point east in michigan
     
Aug 31, 2023 14:55 |  #2

local newspaper (which no longer really qualifies for a newspaper from Gannett News) and a couple of local web based news/info sites got some pretty mediocre shots of the ribbon cutting. i thought this was a much better angle, with the fabulous clock in the background.

and i didnt even put my arm out of joint patting myself on the back..lol

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2023/08/5/LQ_1224404.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1224404) © Ltdave [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

-im just trying. sometimes i succeed

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,821 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16157
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Aug 31, 2023 23:05 |  #3

Ltdave wrote in post #19556081 (external link)
so i stopped across the street from the city's municipal theater/auditorium that has a beautiful limestone front with a fountain and gold clock on its face. . . . out comes some woman and demands to know what im taking pictures of. . . . when i told her i was shooting the auditorium, she said "but there are kids over there.". . .

my only first time dealing with this crap but it was pretty annoying...

Nowhere in your story do I see the woman identifying herself and saying why she has the authority that makes her rules the ones to follow. Was there anything like that? And what was the outcome? Did she give up and leave you alone after looking through the camera?


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ltdave
THREAD ­ STARTER
it looks like im post #19,016
Avatar
5,671 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 8511
Joined Apr 2012
Location: the farthest point east in michigan
     
Sep 01, 2023 20:00 |  #4

OhLook wrote in post #19556188 (external link)
Nowhere in your story do I see the woman identifying herself and saying why she has the authority that makes her rules the ones to follow. Was there anything like that? And what was the outcome? Did she give up and leave you alone after looking through the camera?

because she never did identify herself. just a server or the bar tender at the bar with an air of superiority.

she went back inside but i dont know if she knew what she was looking at, looking through the camera.


-im just trying. sometimes i succeed

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,821 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16157
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Sep 01, 2023 23:05 |  #5

Ltdave wrote in post #19556437 (external link)
because she never did identify herself.

Just as I suspected. Some people think that simply being themselves puts them in the right.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,826 posts
Gallery: 263 photos
Likes: 5978
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Sep 02, 2023 03:28 |  #6

I don't know the laws in your country so can't really comment about your legal situation. In New Zealand it is lawful to take photographs of people (no age limit applies) in public places.

see: https://www.police.gov​t.nz …s-or-filming-public-place (external link)

Technically if it were in NZ (and I suspect similar in the US) you could tell said Karen to go elsewhere, but realistically you have no idea of the mental state of some folks, so it's always useful to at least advise people if asked, you're a photographer and give a simple reason that you're taking the shot that you are.

Other countries around the world have completely different laws!


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ltdave
THREAD ­ STARTER
it looks like im post #19,016
Avatar
5,671 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 8511
Joined Apr 2012
Location: the farthest point east in michigan
     
Sep 02, 2023 07:38 |  #7

joeseph wrote in post #19556495 (external link)
I don't know the laws in your country so can't really comment about your legal situation. In New Zealand it is lawful to take photographs of people (no age limit applies) in public places.

see: https://www.police.gov​t.nz …s-or-filming-public-place (external link)

Technically if it were in NZ (and I suspect similar in the US) you could tell said Karen to go elsewhere, but realistically you have no idea of the mental state of some folks, so it's always useful to at least advise people if asked, you're a photographer and give a simple reason that you're taking the shot that you are.

Other countries around the world have completely different laws!

Yep. No expectation of privacy when in a public space, or even a private place if visible from the public space provided nothing extraordinary is done by the photographer to see into the private space. i.e. I can't get a ladder to see over a fence or a hedge, in order to see into a window, even if the shades are wide open...

I just didn't feel like being confrontational


-im just trying. sometimes i succeed

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

332 views & 1 like for this thread, 3 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
city scapes, kids and karens
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Urban Life & Travel 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1084 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.