Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 05 Apr 2006 (Wednesday) 06:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2 Portraits

 
AdamLM
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Florida
     
Apr 05, 2006 06:04 |  #1

These are in natural light. Both shot with the 24-70. First one was taken at 1/40 f7.1 ISO 1600 Exposure Comp -2/3 43mm. Second was at 1/640 f4.5 ISO 100 50mm. Both are not edited. Please let me know what I could have done better. Thank you.

Adam


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nidz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,408 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2005
Location: VIC, Australia
     
Apr 05, 2006 06:50 |  #2

I like the second picture better. Probably because of the lighting I guess. Indoor lighting seems too fake in a normal room even thought she does have some nice shadows.


Stop or I'll Shoot!
10 Years on POTN Forums!
Canon 350D | 70-200f/4L | ef35-105mm | ef100-300mm | 50mm f1.8 etc..
Some of my Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Apr 05, 2006 09:30 |  #3

The young lady has near perfect lighting. The angle of the light coming from above and to one side gives the best depth of facial contours and best 3 dimensionality. The exposure is a little low - could be just a bit brighter overall.

I also acknowledge the excellent control over the background - it is unobtrusive and harmonious in color, and best of all there are no tonal merges with the hair line.

Swinging around to the left a little and having her head follow the camera would put just a little more light into the eyes and perhaps provide a catch light in the eyes.

She is beautiful and is perfectly posed.

The only thing wrong with the light is that it is too harsh. That is, it is producing some small hot spots on her right forehead, cheek and nose ridge. Those hot spots would not be quite so hot if the light were from a northern exposure. I suspect that this was direct or near direct sunlight coming through a window.

I really like this excellent portrait better than the one to the right.

The sailor is in direct sunlight, which is much, much too harsh (contrasty) - it even makes him squint. Far better would be to find open shade for outdoor portraits. There is always open shade available somewhere - you just have to consciously look for it.

You will find open shade on the north side of a building. The idea is to be shaded from the direct rays of the sun but have bright open sky above your subject. This gives the softest lighting and eliminates the deep black shadows (like those seen on his left cheek and neck.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamLM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Florida
     
Apr 06, 2006 02:24 |  #4

Thank you for your inputs. The first one was taken on a cloudy day outside in a bus-stop-like booth in a park. The lasger version actually has quite a bit of noise. Going to have to get some noise reduction software soon...


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Apr 07, 2006 00:12 |  #5

I really like the lighting on #1. As Robert mentioned, #2 is lit too harshly.

BTW - There are several free noise reduction packages available. I use Neat Image.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamLM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Florida
     
Apr 07, 2006 02:23 |  #6

Thanks. I'll look up Neat Image.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Apr 07, 2006 22:34 |  #7

Another free one that I have found to work equally well is
Noiseware Community Edition by Imagenomic


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamLM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Florida
     
Apr 09, 2006 05:08 |  #8

Thanks Bob.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 09, 2006 06:26 |  #9

Both are good. A little fill flash in #1 would've put nice catchlights in her eye. I like photos of people looking more at the camera, but that's personal taste.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sando
Goldmember
Avatar
2,868 posts
Joined Apr 2006
     
Apr 09, 2006 23:00 |  #10

Prefer the first one, more character. The sailor guy looks bored.

BTW, isnt that Cuba Gooding Jr.? :D


- Matt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamLM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Florida
     
Apr 10, 2006 03:39 |  #11

Thanks again everyone. I can't learn fast enough.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Apr 10, 2006 07:38 as a reply to  @ AdamLM's post |  #12

Although the first pic is technically better, i'd say the second had more potential to be a great shot.

If you had used a portable reflector to fill in the shadows a little on the sailor and captured a slightly better facial expression it could have had a depth that the first one, being a standard indoor portrait, is missing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamLM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Florida
     
Apr 10, 2006 17:06 as a reply to  @ Hermes's post |  #13

Good point. Thank you.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,556 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
2 Portraits
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2047 guests, 97 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.