Sigma 70-300 @ 200 mm + all kenko tubes
iso 800
f10
1/160
C&C welcomed
HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
MuffYz Senior Member 251 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Milan, Italy More info | Apr 07, 2006 07:59 | #1 Sigma 70-300 @ 200 mm + all kenko tubes HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Sorry for my english..it's not my first language.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dimitri_V Cream of the Crop  9,221 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Scotland More info | Apr 07, 2006 08:10 | #2  Permanent banIt looks like a very tiny spot is in focus only,was that intensional? My site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tpetty Senior Member  943 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2005 Location: Keller, Texas More info | Apr 07, 2006 08:59 | #3 If it wasn't intentional, I share this difficulty. It it was, I still like the effect. With that much focal length even F10 is hard for me to keep it all sharp. I'm curious to know if you and others have any thoughts about improving shots like this in that circumstance. Trent
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 07, 2006 09:11 | #4 It was intentional..I think that or you shoot at f22/f32 but you lose quality due to rifraction or you can shot different picture and stich them..there are some programs that do that (if you look in the macro part of the forum there are some people using this tecnique) Sorry for my english..it's not my first language.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dimitri_V Cream of the Crop 9,221 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Scotland More info | Permanent ban MuffYz wrote: It was intentional..I think that or you shoot at f22/f32 but you lose quality due to rifraction or you can shot different picture and stich them..there are some programs that do that (if you look in the macro part of the forum there are some people using this tecnique) Bye Right,OK,thank you for the info. My site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dazzlebea Cream of the Crop  5,329 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: SoCal More info | MuffYz wrote: It was intentional..I think that or you shoot at f22/f32 but you lose quality due to rifraction or you can shot different picture and stich them..there are some programs that do that (if you look in the macro part of the forum there are some people using this tecnique) Bye Actually they are not stiched, they are stacked. The same pics with a bit of a difference in focal point are stacked ontop of each other. Very cool and effective and next on my list of things to learn
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dazzlebea wrote: Actually they are not stiched, they are stacked. The same pics with a bit of a difference in focal point are stacked ontop of each other. Very cool and effective and next on my list of things to learn  .Nice daisy pic. Lovely colors. Did you try f16? ok..thank you for the info..i would like to learn too.. Sorry for my english..it's not my first language.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1220 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
