cyber_m0nkey Senior Member 701 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Singapore<--Sydney<--Odessa More info | Apr 08, 2006 22:04 | #1 |
jbkalla Goldmember  2,831 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Elizabeth, Colorado, USA More info | Apr 08, 2006 22:45 | #2 Wow! Great bokeh! Like that 85L! John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cyber_m0nkey THREAD STARTER Senior Member 701 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Singapore<--Sydney<--Odessa More info |
jbkalla Goldmember 2,831 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Elizabeth, Colorado, USA More info | cyber_m0nkey wrote: Thanks jbkalla. I wish it was the L, not just the humble 85 1.8 (fantastic lens btw) with extension tubes... Ooops! Sorry. Got L-dazed from your list! John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer  51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Apr 09, 2006 06:29 | #5 The "09" is out of focus or blurry, which i'm finding distracting. It's not nice bokeh, it doesn't look quite right to me... not sure why. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cyber_m0nkey THREAD STARTER Senior Member 701 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Singapore<--Sydney<--Odessa More info | tim wrote: The "09" is out of focus or blurry, which i'm finding distracting. It's not nice bokeh, it doesn't look quite right to me... not sure why. The 09 is supposed to be OOF. Only the brand name is supposed to be in focus. That's the best I could do given the angle the watch is at and the fact I wasn't using TS lens. Personally I like the bokeh, gives the image a bit of edginess (if there is such a word)...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sando Goldmember  2,868 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | Apr 09, 2006 22:51 | #7 Sorry, I dont like it. It seems too manufactured to me. How much PP went on with it? I can see what you're trying to achieve with the logo, but maybe it's just a little too 'obvious', if you follow me? - Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChopstickHero Senior Member  678 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Redlands, CA More info | Apr 09, 2006 23:04 | #8 i think there's a bit too much bokeh ... and the purplish CA bits are a bit distracting Canon 40D and 350D :: Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS :: Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS :: Canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 :: Canon BG-E2 & BG-E3 :: Canon 430EX Speedlite :: Crumpler 6MDH & The Whickey and Cox
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jj1987 Goldmember 1,398 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Florida More info | Apr 10, 2006 01:37 | #9 I think its an excellent demo of the lens. It shows you can use bokeh to your advantage.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cyber_m0nkey THREAD STARTER Senior Member 701 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Singapore<--Sydney<--Odessa More info | sando wrote: Sorry, I dont like it. It seems too manufactured to me. How much PP went on with it? I can see what you're trying to achieve with the logo, but maybe it's just a little too 'obvious', if you follow me? Actually, there's no photoshop in this at all, straight from camera to RAW converter, even the resizing was done as part of the conversion...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cyber_m0nkey THREAD STARTER Senior Member 701 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Singapore<--Sydney<--Odessa More info | ChopstickHero wrote: i think there's a bit too much bokeh ... and the purplish CA bits are a bit distracting I must admit the CA did bother me to begin with, but I liked the image overall so got over the CA. I actually like the bokeh, particularily since it was my intention to achieve the image the way it is...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cyber_m0nkey THREAD STARTER Senior Member 701 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Singapore<--Sydney<--Odessa More info | jj1987 wrote: I think its an excellent demo of the lens. It shows you can use bokeh to your advantage. Theres nothing wrong with the image, but I struggle to see what it would be used for. Thanks jj1987. I didn't take the image with a particular 'use' in mind, but I would think that it could be used in an add, probably in a 'left-of-centre' fashion magazine, maybe for an add for a new release where they wouldn't want to make the design too obvious, but rather just give a hint, or an add for the brand to associate the name with watches rather then add for 'a' watch - I don't know, like I said I didn't have a particular use in mind - just pictured this in my mind and made it happen...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sando Goldmember 2,868 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | cyber_m0nkey wrote: Actually, there's no photoshop in this at all, straight from camera to RAW converter, even the resizing was done as part of the conversion... Wow, then it that case you have HUGE talent! Well done! But I do stand by and say it looks a little too... well, I dont know the word, but I think it would look a little better if the gradiant between the focussed part and the OOF part was less. - Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mbze430 Goldmember  2,454 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Chino Hills More info | Apr 10, 2006 23:02 | #14 As a commerical product shot this will never fly, because of the bad case of CA. I don't see other use for an image of such. The shot will probably work better in B&W this way everything is in greyscale, and the red and green CA won't be so distracting. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeWhy "Monkey's uncle"  10,596 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Pasadena, CA More info | Apr 12, 2006 02:57 | #15 Something about the 09 on the date being OOF bothers me, I can't put my finger on it. Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2563 guests, 89 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
