I'm looking of this lens
sukceno Member  180 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Juodšiliai, Lithuania More info | Feb 16, 2011 09:49 | #1051 |
.Davis. Senior Member  439 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Wisconsin More info | Feb 16, 2011 23:05 | #1052 Had no idea how easy this picture trick actually was until I sat down and did it....  (to add, I will be attempting this picture again, but with three different pictures, the first two with the same settings (background then background and laptop, then a third picture metering for the computer screen so I can use the menu bar at the top, and dock at the bottom of the screen) Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
.Davis. Senior Member 439 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Wisconsin More info | Feb 18, 2011 09:01 | #1053 Showing depth of field... This was taken about 1 1/2 feet away  Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GoRk Senior Member  587 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Feb 18, 2011 15:43 | #1054 .Davis. wrote in post #11859039  Had no idea how easy this picture trick actually was until I sat down and did it.... (to add, I will be attempting this picture again, but with three different pictures, the first two with the same settings (background then background and laptop, then a third picture metering for the computer screen so I can use the menu bar at the top, and dock at the bottom of the screen) the point is to get this effect without photoshop...not cuting out the screen on the layer with the computer and having the pic without the conmputer on layer under...but to make a desktop picture and frame it so it fits into the enviroment... My Facebook fan page https://www.facebook.com …otography/161698317237346
LOG IN TO REPLY |
.Davis. Senior Member 439 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Wisconsin More info | Feb 18, 2011 18:35 | #1055 GoRk wrote in post #11869364 the point is to get this effect without photoshop...not cuting out the screen on the layer with the computer and having the pic without the conmputer on layer under...but to make a desktop picture and frame it so it fits into the enviroment... ok, challenge accepted! Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoeyBaccala Goldmember  More info | Feb 19, 2011 18:55 | #1056
Paityn by Joseph Kaminski, on FlickrJOEY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dandan1 Goldmember 1,223 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Silicon Valley, CA More info | Feb 19, 2011 22:07 | #1057 .Davis. wrote in post #11870297 ok, challenge accepted! I've seen it done both ways, but I guess I took the easy way out.  I'll be back
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Owl_79 Senior Member  786 posts Likes: 105 Joined Feb 2010 More info | Feb 20, 2011 02:20 | #1058
Canon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sunnysid3up Member 141 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Feb 20, 2011 14:48 | #1059 i just bought these lens yesterday, and to be honest, they are pretty soft until f/2.8, much like the canon 50mm f/1.4 Visit my flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
twoshadows Liquid Nitrogen  7,342 posts Gallery: 52 photos Best ofs: 19 Likes: 4904 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Between the palms and the pines. More info | Feb 20, 2011 15:16 | #1060 Sunnysid3up wrote in post #11879902 i just bought these lens yesterday, and to be honest, they are pretty soft until f/2.8, much like the canon 50mm f/1.4 Pics with exif, please? xgender.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sunnysid3up Member 141 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Feb 20, 2011 16:19 | #1061 twoshadows wrote in post #11880031 Pics with exif, please? you can check out my flickr set for more details.  Canon 28mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8 by IHaveBeenFramed, on Flickr Canon 28mm f/1.8 @ f/2.2 by IHaveBeenFramed, on Flickr Canon 28mm f/1.8 @ f/2.8 by IHaveBeenFramed, on FlickrVisit my flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
twoshadows Liquid Nitrogen 7,342 posts Gallery: 52 photos Best ofs: 19 Likes: 4904 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Between the palms and the pines. More info | Feb 20, 2011 16:33 | #1062 I see what you're talking about, although at 1/25s and slower I'd have to call this an unreliable test. Try it in good light (or use a flash if you have one) at shutter speeds of around 1/200s - 1/250s and tripod mounted. If you're having the same issue, I'd return it for a better one. xgender.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sunnysid3up Member 141 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Feb 20, 2011 16:41 | #1063 twoshadows wrote in post #11880374 I see what you're talking about, although at 1/25s and slower I'd have to call this an unreliable test. Try it in good light (or use a flash if you have one) at shutter speeds of around 1/200s - 1/250s and tripod mounted. If you're having the same issue, I'd return it for a better one. BTW, the 50mm f/1.4 (Canon) I had was sharp from wide open. I think you've been a little unlucky with those two lenses. the 50mm f/1.4 is known to be a bit soft wide open. Visit my flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 20, 2011 16:43 | #1064 If those were taken with a tripod I'd say you have a bad copy or there's some other issue. I've shot wide open with mine numerous times and never seen anything as soft as those photos suggest. Even compared to your 2.8 shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sunnysid3up Member 141 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Feb 20, 2011 16:46 | #1065 marubozo wrote in post #11880421 If those were taken with a tripod I'd say you have a bad copy or there's some other issue. I've shot wide open with mine numerous times and never seen anything as soft as those photos suggest. Even compared to your 2.8 shot. maybe my copy is bad. it just seems ridiculous to me because the reviews I have read all indicate this is a really good lens. Visit my flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 929 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
