Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Apr 2006 (Tuesday) 13:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Scanning resolution?

 
philbyuk
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Nov 2005
Location: manchester uk
     
Apr 11, 2006 13:18 |  #1

ok ive just managed to 'loan' the family airloom photographs!! about 400 in all,(going back to my great great grandparents) and I have the task of scanning them and putting them on dvd...and probably printing some of the better ones.
What i need to know is what is the best resolution for scanning them? my scanner can go up to 9600 dpi. is it best to scan that hi (as some will need pp) or is it best to scan, at say 300 for the photo printouts?(i believe its okay to show them at less than 300dpi on dvds...help needed

thanks phil


My Gear

flickr (external link)
My 365 '2018' (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NickC
Member
221 posts
Joined Dec 2001
Location: Sunnyvale, CA USA
     
Apr 11, 2006 14:53 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

300 dpi is fine for Photoshopping, but if the photos are not that large in size, you could scan at 600 dpi. The size of the scan files will grow, of course, and by more than double (if you scan an 8x10 photo at 600 dpi it may be a 100+MB file). Save them as Photoshop documents to work with them, not jpg files. Four hundred photos will take quite some time just to do the scans...I don't envy the task!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philbyuk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Nov 2005
Location: manchester uk
     
Apr 11, 2006 15:04 |  #3

thanks nick..im sorta looking forward and not at the same time..luckyly ive got a fortnight off


My Gear

flickr (external link)
My 365 '2018' (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Apr 11, 2006 17:13 |  #4

I would recommend scanning at 600DPI as a minimum. That will provide you with images that could be further cropped and still be printed with good resolution.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RossW
Senior Member
804 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Chester County, PA USA
     
Apr 11, 2006 21:09 |  #5

Even 300 dpi is overkill, unless the original is very small and/or you need to do some serious cropping. I rarely find any advantage to going higher than 150 dpi; with my "classic" H-P flatbed I can enlarge/crop with the scanner, so there's usually no need to generate huge files with high dpi settings.


S2IS
30D; 24-85 EF; 70-300 EF IS; 50 1.4 EF
and a much-beloved old FTb 35mm!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20D-Newbe
Member
35 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Oxfordshire/Wiltshire - UK
     
Apr 12, 2006 03:11 |  #6

Have a read through this web site - all you need to know about scanning (just make sure you have 2hrs set aside!!!)

http://www.scantips.co​m/ (external link)

In a nut shell you don't get much detail when you scan at 600dpi rather than 300dpi. So stick to 300dpi. If you looking to reprint or edit the pictures then maybe scan at 600dpi (but still there is not going to be any more detail!!!)

Just keep in mind this all applies to colour images only - B&W and negatives are a different story altogether.


Andy
Canon
20D w/Grip BG-E2 Twin Canon 511A's & Twin SterlingTek 511's
EF 16-35mm f2.8 L w/Hood & Tokina UV filter
EF 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM w/Hood & Jessops UV filter
Sigma 50-500mm f4-6.3 APO DG HSM w/Hood & Hoya UV filter & 1.4x t-con
EF 70-200mm 2.8 L IS USM w/Hood & B&W UV filter
TC-80N3 Timer Remote Controller
Speedlite 580EX
1x 1GB (80x) Lexar, 1x 1GB & 2x 512Mb Jessops CF :o
Manfrotto 458B w/405 Geared head
Ixus 400 - as general backup or when I have the wrong lens on the D20 (Doh!!!)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philbyuk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Nov 2005
Location: manchester uk
     
Apr 12, 2006 06:50 |  #7

thanks andy so whats the story with b/w 60% are b/w..help


My Gear

flickr (external link)
My 365 '2018' (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20D-Newbe
Member
35 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Oxfordshire/Wiltshire - UK
     
Apr 13, 2006 10:39 |  #8

Did you manage to have a read of the web site?

This is a direct extract

“B&W prints have only one emulsion layer, and might sometimes yield more detail when scanned above 300 dpi. That is nothing that I care to debate, but in particular, old historic B&W prints were often contact prints from large negatives (no enlargement at all), which may yield more detail when scanned up at 400 dpi or more, assuming size is needed.”

Hope it helps – I don’t envy your job – I have a load of prints and negatives I keep putting off – just can’t get the inspiration going


Andy
Canon
20D w/Grip BG-E2 Twin Canon 511A's & Twin SterlingTek 511's
EF 16-35mm f2.8 L w/Hood & Tokina UV filter
EF 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM w/Hood & Jessops UV filter
Sigma 50-500mm f4-6.3 APO DG HSM w/Hood & Hoya UV filter & 1.4x t-con
EF 70-200mm 2.8 L IS USM w/Hood & B&W UV filter
TC-80N3 Timer Remote Controller
Speedlite 580EX
1x 1GB (80x) Lexar, 1x 1GB & 2x 512Mb Jessops CF :o
Manfrotto 458B w/405 Geared head
Ixus 400 - as general backup or when I have the wrong lens on the D20 (Doh!!!)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philbyuk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Nov 2005
Location: manchester uk
     
Apr 13, 2006 11:04 |  #9

andy thanks a million for that info..well started yesterday did the 1st hundred..then nightmare..comp crashed b4 saving (what a waste of a day) well learned to save after each 10 scans (only prob it starts at 0001 again.so have to rename the files as i go!!!! this fortnight is going to go by sooooooo quick.


My Gear

flickr (external link)
My 365 '2018' (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PEACHMAN
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,134 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Warren, Maine,USA
     
Apr 13, 2006 13:35 |  #10

I have worked on this same task (I say worked on not completed)...I began scanning at 300dpi....then I came asross some photos my dad took on the island of Iwo Shima where the Japaneese contingent for the surrender of WWII landed before proceeding to I beleive the USS Missouri for final proceedings....These were tiny photos , like 2"X3"...I wanted to blow them up and tried them at 5X7 or close to that. The photos didnt look to good, so I just tried for the heck of it at 600 dpi...I could not beleive the difference...all the experessions of misery , discontent and resentment were visable and obvious on their faces.... Now I figure if I'm going to take the time to save these, then I don't want to loose any details for future generations...I tried higher res, but found that the grain size of the photos kicked in at about 600 with no noticable improvement above that...so now I try and stay at 600, unless the photos are lousy anyway , then I drop back to 300 to save time....good luck!


The "eyes" have it !


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philbyuk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Nov 2005
Location: manchester uk
     
Apr 13, 2006 15:28 |  #11

thanks peachman ill bear that in mind for the smaller pics..gonna start again tommorow


My Gear

flickr (external link)
My 365 '2018' (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hemuni
Goldmember
Avatar
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2005
     
Apr 13, 2006 15:33 |  #12

I would say it depends on what you want to do with the images. If its for 6x4 printing 300 is fine but if you need larger 600 is probably a better choice.

Make some tests and See what fits your needs.


((¯`•.¸hemuni¸.•´¯)) 1000D • 85F1.8 • 50F1.4 • 28F2.8 • 18-55IS • YN565EX - POTN gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Apr 13, 2006 20:01 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

600 dpi at 8bit TIFF.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
webexplorer
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Joined May 2006
     
Aug 06, 2006 21:35 as a reply to  @ Hellashot's post |  #14

I define required resolution by target print size. 100% image @ 300dpi target printing is more than sufficient IMO.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,199 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Scanning resolution?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
644 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.