And last two I promise...
Cotmweasel Senior Member 995 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Dallas, TX More info | May 18, 2008 21:42 | #317 I posted this in the Macro section already but here -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sydor25 Goldmember 2,356 posts Likes: 15 Joined Feb 2005 Location: North Texas More info | May 18, 2008 23:11 | #318 1D Mark III, 5D Mark III, EF 17-40 f/4, EF 24-105 f/4 IS, EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6, EF 24 f/1.4, EF 300 f/4 IS, EF 100 f/2.8 Macro & EF-S 10-22
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Winzzy Member 56 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: Phoenix AZ More info | May 18, 2008 23:44 | #319 I just orderd mine! Can't wait to get it..... I better get a sharp copy =P Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
photobitz PlatinumMeasurebaiter 6,501 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: NSW, Australia More info | May 19, 2008 01:15 | #320 Winzzy wrote in post #5551639 I just orderd mine! Can't wait to get it..... I better get a sharp copy =P I don't think I've seen any that weren't Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinwin Junior Member 29 posts Joined Jul 2006 More info | Hi all 100mm f2.8 macro lens owner, Canon 30D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
photobitz PlatinumMeasurebaiter 6,501 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: NSW, Australia More info | May 19, 2008 12:11 | #322 vinwin wrote in post #5554100 Hi all 100mm f2.8 macro lens owner, I just bought the 100mm f2.8 macro lens? Did some test shot and notice the center sharpness and contrast is peak at about f11 or f16. I am puzzle and hence posted a thread on " Center not sharp as apearture increase on 100mm macro?" From your experience, what is the best apearture for the centre sharpness when you are at the minimal focal distance to the object? One other question is when using the extension tube, how much closer can we get close to the object? Thanks for sharing. That is quite normal. You will find that sharpness will drop off past about f/16 due to internal diffraction. This happens on all lenses to some degree, but the effect is most pronounced at macro distances. Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinwin Junior Member 29 posts Joined Jul 2006 More info | May 20, 2008 11:10 | #323 photobitz wrote in post #5554301 That is quite normal. You will find that sharpness will drop off past about f/16 due to internal diffraction. This happens on all lenses to some degree, but the effect is most pronounced at macro distances. To get around the shallow DOF in macro you should consider using stacking software instead of using smaller apertures. What is "stacking software"? Canon 30D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wimg Cream of the Crop 6,982 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Netherlands, EU More info | May 20, 2008 13:49 | #324 vinwin wrote in post #5560943 What is "stacking software"? Stacking software essentially is software that allows you to combine just the sharp bits of several photographs of the same subject. When you do this at slightly different focusing distances, you can increase the DoF in a very dramatic way. This may be a dumb question. If the peak performance of the lens is at f/16, why would someone want to use the smaller apearture like f/22, f/29, f/32 when taking macro. Why a macro lens is design to have such small apearture when it no longer sharp at those small apeartures? ![]() Because sometimes it is the only way to take a photograph of something. A slightly soft photograph may under certain conidtions be better than no photograph at all. Furthermore, not enlarging the photograph a lot may still result in an acceptable photograph, because it will look sharper at smaller magnifications than at larger ones. EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters, and an accessory plague
LOG IN TO REPLY |
10-Dee-Q Member 206 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | May 20, 2008 15:37 | #325 hi all i'm intersted to buy this lens for general purpose, potrait and macro and indoor sports Canon 500D | , 50 f/1.8 MK I, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
troypiggo Goldmember 4,743 posts Likes: 172 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA More info | May 20, 2008 16:32 | #326 10-Dee-Q wrote in post #5562665 hi all i'm intersted to buy this lens for general purpose, potrait and macro and indoor sports i have question though, can this lens be fitted with 1.4x or 2x Tcon? canon or 3rd party one ? and what f it's gonna be when fitted with 2x tcon ? thank you , sorry i'm still beginner :P thx. There's a teleconvertor FAQ sticky in the Lenses Forum "Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic." - Sheldon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Winzzy Member 56 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: Phoenix AZ More info | Mine comes in on Friday, just in time for my trip to Sedona, AZ... Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
10-Dee-Q Member 206 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | May 21, 2008 01:41 | #330 troypiggo wrote in post #5563035 There's a teleconvertor FAQ sticky in the Lenses Forum My quick read says it can be fitted directly to the Sigma TCs, but doesn't mention it in the Canon TCs table. I have used TCs with my Canon 100mm, but I put extension tubes between the camera body and the TC. It works. Can't remember, but pretty sure you don't get AF. Have to manually focus - but that's fine because you normally do with macro anyway.
Canon 500D | , 50 f/1.8 MK I, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1763 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||