hi ,i have been asked (well more pestered) to take a few pics of a friends wedding.At first i said no, as im not that confident with taking wedding photos (not my personal foray).However as they have no money and cannot afford a photographer and have ask me to take some pics of the day.
I have agreed, on the understanding that the (pics) will not be up to professional standards and that they agree to pay for paper ink and a bit on top for time.
as they dont expect too much from the photos it takes a lot of pressure off me for the shoot and should be a good experience and learnig curve for me.
the wedding will be in the local registry office (flourescent lighting...and will be using CWB there)so i was thinking maybe 17-40 for the ceremony part (if flash is allowed..need to check on that)if not which is better the 50mm or 60mm macro? as for the signing of the book and ring shots..60mm(not to impressed with the 50 1.8) outside there is a small grassy area for the 'after cerimonial shots' i was thinking the 70-200 there and the 17-40 for the group shots with fill in flash(weather permitting)
So will this setup be ok? as stated earlier they dont expect a lot or a high std(they actually saw the pics of the twins (the pritnted vers)i posted on another thread and were 'amazed' although i didnt really rate it) but it gives me an idea what std they'll be happy with.
so im looking forward to the shoot and will be very happy for any ideas tips for shooting a registry office..unfortunately they're not having a reception/buffet.(cost).so ive missed out on the food as well.
please note ..i know some people try and skimp on photographers at weddings trying to save some money on the day and get some amateur to do it cheap..but with this couple they really dont have much hence the registry office and no reception after....thats why im doing it for them for next to nothing (only experience..worth more than money to me).

