Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 15 Apr 2006 (Saturday) 08:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

cheap tripod vers no tripod?

 
philbyuk
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Nov 2005
Location: manchester uk
     
Apr 15, 2006 08:50 |  #1

hi doing some outdoor shoots of friends soon ..(on grass). ill be using the 17-40L but the problem is at the moment i only have a 'cheap tripod' (hama gamma series) will this tripod suffice or will it cause more trouble than what it's worth, or would it be better to hand hold?
set up consist of....
canon 20d,580ex flash,17-40L lens, flash bracket and off shoe cord.
will the tripod handle this set up??
BTW if i use the tripod i will also be using the remote switch..RS-80N3
thanks phil


My Gear

flickr (external link)
My 365 '2018' (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NoLight
Senior Member
576 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 66
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Texas
     
Apr 15, 2006 09:08 |  #2

Any tripod is better than nothing.. But I dont know what that lens weights, you should be fine tho "should be"... Only one to really find out!!! Good Luck




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Apr 15, 2006 09:14 |  #3

Definitely, a cheap tripod is better than none. Just mind the weight so that the legs don't buckle or anything falls over (it'll be obvious if the tripod can't handle it).

Even a cheap tripod gives you the important thing (most of the time) - stability. From there it's better/more features, smoother operation/ergonomics and additional stability.

When you're ready to take the shot and done fiddling with the camera, give it a second or three to settle down - click.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Apr 15, 2006 09:16 |  #4

Good question ... use the tripod unless you shoot during an earthquake ;-)a but you will be fine handheld too if the shutter is fast enough: not hard if light is Ok at this length IMO.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Apr 15, 2006 09:48 |  #5

True... Especially with an f/4 lens and a 580EX. Daylight should be no problem. With the 20D even higher ISOs won't be noisy.

Unless he wants to get in the shot? Heh.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Apr 15, 2006 09:58 |  #6

A cheap tripod is better than no tripod EXCEPT when it - with your camera and lens mounted - falls over because it is not stable. Stable, in this context, means that the tripod is heavy enough and strong enough to stay where you put it even with a minor accidental push or wind blowing on it.

One way to add to the stability is to hang your camera bag somewhere down low on the tripod.

Handholding your shots - or at least keeping your hands on the camera while on a flimsy tripod - is one way to prevent accidental damage to your camera.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Apr 15, 2006 10:03 |  #7

I have a cheap tripod from WalMart because I was out of town and didn't have enough money or time to get a good one. It was not too heavy and came with two base connectors. It is fine for all that you listed. When I have a chance, I will get a more collapsable one that is a lot lighter, but for right now, I just put it with my other gear. Better to have a cheap one than none at all.

Oh, and I also saw a pro with the remote shutter release while her camera was on the tripod. She said it is great for night photography. I got one right away. I am going to us that a lot more as well.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Apr 15, 2006 11:15 as a reply to  @ SuzyView's post |  #8

SuzyView wrote:
Oh, and I also saw a pro with the remote shutter release while her camera was on the tripod. She said it is great for night photography. I got one right away. I am going to us that a lot more as well.

Oh, without a doubt... If my camera's on the tripod, I click in the remote.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
foxbat
Goldmember
Avatar
2,432 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Essex, UK.
     
Apr 15, 2006 11:22 |  #9

Any support is better than none. But like Skip says, watch it doesn't all come crashing down when you're not looking.


Andy Brown; South-east England. Canon, Sigma, Leica, Zeiss all on Canon DSLRs. My hacking blog (external link).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steved110
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,776 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: East Sussex UK
     
Apr 15, 2006 11:29 as a reply to  @ foxbat's post |  #10

A cheap tripod will be fine, they are not as rock solid, so watch that it doesn't fall over or drop your gear when you are not looking.
What I found with my cheap 'pod was that it was really hard to make fine adjustments in positioning the camera head - small movements to get the horizon level would be jerky and I'd end up taking ages to get it right.
But they do have the advantage of being a fair bit lighter than a serious tripod, so thus may be more useful in that you use it more often...


Canon 6D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
CanonEF 17-40 f/4 L Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS L and 70-200 f/4 L :D
Speedlite 580EX and some bags'n pods'n stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Apr 15, 2006 11:33 |  #11

Oh, without a doubt... If my camera's on the tripod, I click in the remote.

Does it help you see what everyone is doing in the shot instead of trying to see through the little viewfinder?


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Apr 15, 2006 11:40 as a reply to  @ SuzyView's post |  #12

SuzyView wrote:
Does it help you see what everyone is doing in the shot instead of trying to see through the little viewfinder?

It makes it easier to notice the little things - a spot of glare off someone's watch, someone not smiling, twisted clothing - that kind of thing. Also it's easier to get people's attention and give them directions when they can see your face.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
exile
Senior Member
Avatar
903 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: UK (South West...now East Anglia ...and back in Northern Ireland at last)
     
Apr 15, 2006 12:37 as a reply to  @ Curtis N's post |  #13

A couple of people have mentioned the possibility of the whole rig crashing to the ground if the stability isn't the best. I use a cheap tripod at the moment (partly because I can't make up my mind which new one I want to buy:D) - I always have the camera strap hung round my neck so that if the tripod does flip over the camera isn't going to go far.


Outdoor photographer and writer in Northern Ireland (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/80146277@N00/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Apr 15, 2006 16:54 |  #14

Wow, that's really being careful. I try not to trip. I have bi-focals and can't see well walking around with them on, my feet are not in focus. I just try to stay behind the tripod. If I walk backwards, it would be disastrous.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,169 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
cheap tripod vers no tripod?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
644 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.