Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 15 Apr 2006 (Saturday) 21:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

A couple from the feeder

 
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Apr 15, 2006 21:20 |  #1

I had a good hour on the back porch hunting the little feathers - or so I thought. Everything that should be green in my back yard is just starting to bud, and it's all quite dark and brown and kinda yucky. This makes the overall scene dark, which fools my meter and me, so I threw on the Better Beamer.

Fill flash just does not work well with dark backgrounds since this turns the "fill flash" into primary lighting and makes the flash far too obvious. I'm going to have to work on things - like getting a better vantage point to get bright backgrounds or shoot at ISO 800 and drop the flash.

I actually did get some very good shots of some little feathers, but not good shots of the entire scene because of my lack of picking good backgrounds. Live and learn.

Anyway, here's the one good shot of the day, enough to make the day very worthwhile. A Chipping Sparrow:

IMAGE: http://www.itsanadventure.com/postimages/ChippingSparrow_64504.jpg


This is one shot that got away, and I'm crying over. It's not so bad on a web-sized shot, but I managed to focus on his back and his head is too soft. I love these little birds and I've yet to get a perfect shot of one. This shot was too close, and I messed it up.

A Tufted Titmouse:

IMAGE: http://www.itsanadventure.com/postimages/TuftedTitmouse_64565.jpg

(Please believe me when I say that his head is too soft. Just compare his head to his tail. At f/5.6 there's very little DoF at this distance.)

You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tyger
Goldmember
Avatar
1,295 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: toronto, canada
     
Apr 15, 2006 21:29 |  #2

soft or not scottes, these turned out nice. Love everything about the sparrow!


Gear List
You create your reality.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Apr 16, 2006 00:01 |  #3

So, Scott, are you saying that these two shots were taken with a flash? If they were, they sure don't look it. They look very nature to me. i think they came out very well.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Airedale1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,023 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 733
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Laconia, NH USA
     
Apr 16, 2006 02:19 |  #4

Two very nice poses on natural perches. Did you try any USM on the Titmouse?


Sony RX10 M4
Canon S90

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dimitri_V
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,221 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Scotland
     
Apr 16, 2006 07:24 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

I see what you mean about the focus point on the 2nd one,perfect tail.
Why do you like to have bright bg?
I think IMO the dark bg looks much better.


My site (external link)http://www.earthsbeaut​ytours.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
THREAD ­ STARTER
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Apr 16, 2006 10:19 |  #6

Leo, the first was with flash, the second without. I think the sparrow would look a lot better with a brighter background. It's good, but could be better. (In fact now that I see this image again I don't think the web size does it much justice. Check out the 100% crop I posted in another thread here.)

Paul, it was really too soft. Sharpening would have brought out the noise, but not much detail since there wasn't enough detail to sharpen, really.

Dimitri, notice the difference between the two. I think the Titmouse looks much better - and more natural - with the brighter background. The sparrow has a "flash as primary lighting" look to it, whereas the Titmouse, since it is a natural shot, looks more natural. So on a flashed shot a brighter bg would make it look more natural I think.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LazyPhotographer
Goldmember
Avatar
3,163 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Apr 16, 2006 11:51 |  #7

These look really good, seems like you're having a great time with that new lens.

I'm kinda 50-50 on the dark BG, I do think that sometimes they work well. Just have your wife hang a light green, small floral sheet on the clothesline well behind the setup. That'll work! ;-)a


LazyPhotographer: One who uses a telephoto lens to shoot pictures out the car window or from a balcony. :arrow: No Bird Posts Left Behind, dammit! :twisted:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sparker1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
29,368 posts
Likes: 295
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
     
Apr 16, 2006 11:54 |  #8

Well, I'm not as discriminating as you, Scott. I think they look really good.


Stan (See my gallery at http://www.pbase.com/s​parker1 (external link))

7D, 50D, 300D, EF-S 10-22 mm, EF-S 18-55 mm kit lens, EF 24-105 L IS, EF 50 mm 1.8, Sigma 150-500mm (Bigmos)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
THREAD ­ STARTER
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Apr 16, 2006 11:56 as a reply to  @ LazyPhotographer's post |  #9

LazyPhotographer wrote:
Just have your wife hang a light green, small floral sheet on the clothesline well behind the setup. That'll work! ;-)a

ROFL! This thought definitely went through my head... But I'd need to set up a very long clothesline somehow.... Hmmm... It wouldn't be that difficult.... Then buy 6 or 8 sets of sheets to get different backgrounds.... Then dye them with mottled colors when I get tired of them... Hmmmm....

Heck, why not? The neighbors already think I'm crazy anyway....


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,852 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
A couple from the feeder
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1682 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.