Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 17 Apr 2006 (Monday) 13:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

using fill flash?

 
philbyuk
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Nov 2005
Location: manchester uk
     
Apr 17, 2006 13:18 |  #1

hi when using fill flash, do you meter for the background first then dial in the settings (im trying manual cam settings). or do you just frame the shot and let the camera/flash do its trickery?
what i am wondering is....if the exposure is set to partial metering (9%)and the focal point is covering the subject (ie say a full frame potrait outside..say 60% subject and 40% grass/sky) how does one attain the correct ambient light exposure..hope this makes sense?
also does the same apply in indoor shots with fill flash (i know to set FEC first so that i dont get full blast on the subject..just a little confused on how to get the ambient light correct?
also if using av mode if you use partial metering how does the cam evaluate the ambient light? when the focus point is covered?
i had a look on the eos flash bible ..may need to re read it couldnt see these specifics covered


My Gear

flickr (external link)
My 365 '2018' (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Apr 17, 2006 13:24 |  #2

You can do it either way. Partial meter the background with the camera in manual mode and then recompose over the subject and take your picture.

If you want the camera to meter the background without recomposing, then obviously you can't use partial metering. The best choise, then, would be to use center-weighted average metering with some -EC, especially if the subject is fill a large part of the viewfinder, so that the bg isn't overexposed.

Depending on how you want to balance the ambient light and the flash light, you might also want to use some -FEC on the fill so that the fill light doesn't look too obvious and unnatural.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Rabin
Goldmember
1,496 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2004
Location: NJ
     
Apr 17, 2006 22:46 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #3

Let me see if I can convey this...
1. Read the Flash Stickies in the flash Forum.
2. Don't think about the metering mode for a moment. Just look at a scene, or situation (in your mind if you have to).
3. Drill in your brain that Canon's flash exposure metering, and ambient light camera exposure metering, are completely SEPARATE.
4. Now, think of your scene again. Is it a small person standing in a big dark event catering hall, or in front of a dark stone wall? A bird in a dark tree? Then just like with ambient metering, the flash metering sees this "scene" as underexposed, will pound out the E-TTL/II flash power, and undoubtedly ruin the shot with an over-exposed subject. So before you ever shoot, you dial in some negative FEC.
5. The opposite is also true.
6. I could rant on, but Canon E-TTL/II is a dark art. When doing outdoor, bright light fill, I like the "saturated" look I used to get with slides. So, today, in this shot, I metered and intentionally UNDEREXPOSED the ambient background by at least 2/3 to 1 stop, then turned on the flash, and popped it on the foreground person, from an Off Camera Shoe 2 cord, letting E-TTL do the work. To adjust exposure, I adjusted ISO:
http://aesop.rutgers.e​du …s/IPM_Fruit_Tie​tjen_3.htm (external link)

Without flash, his face was almost dark. The subject is not interesting to Forum members, but I really like the exposure this way.
7. One idea is to balance ambient and fill so the flash does not look so much like flash.
8. In really low indoor light, none of this works. You get a deer in the head lights look. There are limits to little hot shoe flash heads.
9. Again, read the stickies.
Jack




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rob612
Goldmember
Avatar
2,459 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Rome, Italy
     
Apr 18, 2006 04:08 |  #4

How about using also something like the Lumiquest minisoftbox or the like for fill in flash (keeping the exposure rules stated above, of course). It will help to make the fill in flash more natural, or I am going the wrong way ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Rabin
Goldmember
1,496 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2004
Location: NJ
     
Apr 18, 2006 06:26 as a reply to  @ Rob612's post |  #5

Cardboard index cards rubberbanded to flash head, Sto-fen diffuser, and Lumiquest are all decent small location approaches to avoiding harsh shadows (wrap-around light). Depending on the scene, sometimes they work, sometimes they don't.

Here's a shot where I used Lumiquest because I could not bounce the flash - no white walls, no white ceiling: http://aesop.rutgers.e​du …/ObroptaCumSale​mWater.htm (external link)

You can just see the shadows on the wall about half-way down, behind the chairs. Lumiquest works decent where there are no walls, but it struggles when shooting wide-angle lens close to subjects.
When using Lumiquest, I have success keeping camera in Manual Exposure Mode. Choosing an f/stop for depth of field.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Apr 18, 2006 06:31 |  #6

Everything you want to know about different flash techniques (external link) ;)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rob612
Goldmember
Avatar
2,459 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Rome, Italy
     
Apr 18, 2006 06:56 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #7

That seems interesting, I forecast an afternoon reading... :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philbyuk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Nov 2005
Location: manchester uk
     
Apr 20, 2006 21:29 |  #8

thanks for the info guys i think ive got the fill flash ok outdoors seems well exposed and natural look to the photos (using -fec)
now the indoor shots are still troubling me(pub/bar type shots ie dark rooms head n shoulder shots)..if i set ss to between 60 and 250 and aperture to 8.0,iso 800(seen them settings on here somewhere so i thought id give em a whirl)the shots come out well exposed but look like theyre taken in a bright room..if i turn down fec the histogram swings right over to the left.ok i understand that and why that happens.
what i would like to know Is it possible in some way to give the appearence of a pub/bar ambience ? without lowering the speed to 'seconds' and risking blur either mine(hand holding or subject moving? yes i know the flash will stop movement but there will still be 'ghosting' and the flash will still lighten the area/walls as theyre sat close to the walls!
maybe im asking to much but if you dont ask you never find out?


My Gear

flickr (external link)
My 365 '2018' (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Apr 21, 2006 05:27 |  #9

Use ISO 1600, open up the aperture, lower shutterspeed to 1/30 (or whatever, according to light levels). Snap away ;)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,673 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
using fill flash?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
642 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.