Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 18 Apr 2006 (Tuesday) 18:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Salesman recommended Kingston Elite 50X over Sandisk Ultra II

 
danster
Member
235 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 44
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 18, 2006 18:12 |  #1

Hi guys, just went to a camera shop yesterday to buy a 1 gig Sandisk Ultra II CF. The shop didn't have any left but the salesman recommended Kingston Elite 50X over Sandisk saying that he's never had a return on the Kingston but had several returns with the Sandisk. Another salesguy then chipped in saying that Sandisk costs more only because of the name.
Were they just saying that to get me to buy the Kingston? BTW I didn't buy the CF card.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cgratti
Lord_Malone, your still a newb...
Avatar
3,315 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: E-A-G-L-E-S - EAGLES
     
Apr 18, 2006 18:17 |  #2

I have a 1GB kingston card, has over 7k of shots on it and never failed me once yet.. It's the main card I use.



Canon 30D

Canon 10D
Canon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 II USM
Apple iMac G5



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
claudermilk
Senior Member
390 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
     
Apr 18, 2006 18:20 |  #3

IMHO they were feeding you a line just to sell the card. Look here & tell me what you think (you'll have to scroll pretty far down to find the Kingston): http://www.robgalbrait​h.com …ti_page.asp?cid​=6007-7303 (external link)

I have 3 of the 1GB Ultra IIs & they have worked flawlessly for over a year.


20D/BG-E2/Katz Eye | Tokina 12-24/4 | 24-70/2.8L | 50/1.8 Mk I | 70-200/2.8L | PD70X

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jjonsalt
Goldmember
1,502 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Central Florida
     
Apr 18, 2006 18:46 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

I also use Kingston's Elite Pro. I'm not in that big a hurry that a few mil/sec mean that much to me. I got it because of the great price and known stability.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
forsakenme720
Senior Member
Avatar
910 posts
Joined Mar 2006
     
Apr 18, 2006 20:32 as a reply to  @ jjonsalt's post |  #5

I have a Kingston Elite Pro as well and it works great and is very fast. No problems at all and I've never seen a bad review for one before. I don't think the salesmen were full of bs on this one. Go with the Kingston.

BTW...speed is not the only important factor in buying a memory card. I would say that quality, stability and dependability are more important. Not that Sandisk isn't good, but you get my point.


Cameras: Canon 20D, Canon Rebel XT (converted to infrared)
Lenses: Canon 17-40mm f4L; Tamron 28-75mm f2.8; Canon 10-22mm f3.5-4.5; Canon 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro; Canon 85mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cfcRebel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,252 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
     
Apr 18, 2006 20:42 |  #6

Four Elite Pro's in my pocket. Never have a problem. Low price, reliable, 50X is fast enough for me.


Fee

Canon | SIGMA | TAMRON | Kenko | Amvona

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlexMa
Senior Member
Avatar
677 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: So Cal (Chino Hills)
     
Apr 18, 2006 20:57 as a reply to  @ cfcRebel's post |  #7

2GB King Elite PRO and Sandisk.

Nor problems with either.........downloa​ds are faster with 66x sandisk


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wazmunstr
Senior Member
Avatar
974 posts
Likes: 99
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Sarasota, FL & Chattanooga, TN USA
     
Apr 18, 2006 21:14 |  #8

i use sandisk ultra II, not problems yet. and its been through 2 different cameras with me.



Instagram // http://www.instagram.c​om/versuspixels (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
Buck Naked Floozies
Avatar
8,405 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Boston, MA
     
Apr 18, 2006 21:31 |  #9

i had them both at one point and i can tell you that you will not be able to tell a difference. my 1gb kingston elite has been great and my sandisk ultra has been great. now i only own sandisk because i sold the kingston with the camera but i plan on buying another 2gb kingston very soon (waiting for another great deal)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mathiau
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Born in London, England living in Calgary, AB
     
Apr 18, 2006 22:11 |  #10

SanDisk Ultra 512 = over 8k pics - never a problem

Sandisk Ultra II 1g - just over 3k in pics now - no problems

Sandisk Ulta III 2g arriving tomorrow - i expect the same performance and better!


Currently Dreaming about what gear to own in the near future
The trouble with life is theres no background music
WARNING - post on images for critique and other items asking for feedback are simply my personal input and thoughts based on my own experiences and preferences.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m3incorp
Senior Member
Avatar
989 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
     
Apr 18, 2006 23:56 |  #11

I use a mixture of the Sandisk Ultra II and Kingston Pro Elites. Both have proven to be of good quality for me. Yes the Ultra II will give you faster write speeds in SOME cameras (probably not the Pentax) and downloading via card reader. The salesmen were probably feeding you a line to sell the Kingston, but you still would have been getting a good card.


7D, 10D, Canon EFS 18-55mm modded
Canon EF 50mm, Canon 85mm 1.8, Tamron 17-50mm F/2.8 XR DiII VC
Canon EF 70-300mm, 70-200 F4 L
, Canon 430ex ii Speedlite.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jngo
Senior Member
526 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Golden State
     
Apr 19, 2006 05:38 |  #12

i think they were feeding you a line so that you'd buy something. if the sandisk was there, would they still have said the same thing?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mitcon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,670 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
     
Apr 19, 2006 05:51 |  #13

Kingston are a fine card, but I don't know why the salesperson was feeding you a line. I've used both and many other brands but Sandisk would have to be my fav pick and has given me no problems with any of their cards. got a 1gig Ultra II thats done about 40k images. No sweat and have others that are getting old now but still never miss a beat


Cheers Wayne :D
EOS 30D+350Dx2+BG-E2+BG-E3+18-55MkII+EF 70-300IS/USM+EF 75-300IIusm+Sigma 50-500DG+Tamron SP90 f2.8Di+Sigma 17-70+Kenco MC7 2x+580EX+430EX

POTN Aussie club

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rlhphotos
Senior Member
Avatar
545 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Coralville, IA
     
Apr 19, 2006 08:25 |  #14

I have 4 1Gb Kingston Cards...never failed me once...And they cost about half of the SanDisk...yeah they are a bit slower than the Sandisks, but not enough that its going to cause you to miss anything.


:: Call Me Rob ::
::Equipment List::
::Business Site (external link) :: Blog Site (external link)::


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Apr 19, 2006 09:41 |  #15

I have 2 Sandisk Ultra (I/II) 512Mbs. About 50 - 60k shots through them. No problems.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,395 views & 0 likes for this thread, 24 members have posted to it.
Salesman recommended Kingston Elite 50X over Sandisk Ultra II
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1176 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.