If flash recycle is an issue, I eliminated that issue altogether with my 420EX flash by using rechargeable NiMH AA's. They recycle about 5x faster and last about 5x longer than regular alkalines.
SpiralPhoto Senior Member 494 posts Joined May 2004 More info | May 14, 2006 19:58 | #16 If flash recycle is an issue, I eliminated that issue altogether with my 420EX flash by using rechargeable NiMH AA's. They recycle about 5x faster and last about 5x longer than regular alkalines. EOS T2i w/batt grip | EF 50mm F1.8 | Sigma 18-50 2.8 | Sigma 10mm F2.8 Fisheye | Sigma 10-20mm | 420EX w/ST-E2 | Glidecam HD-1000 | Rode Videomic | Tascam DR-07 Recorder
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sharyn1983 Senior Member 342 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Omaha, soon to be Okinawa More info | May 15, 2006 16:26 | #17 Best cake smooshing was my last wedding a couple weeks ago where he held her down and licked the cake off her face. Great pictures!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | May 16, 2006 07:00 | #18 CP-E3 is compatiable with the 550EX and 580EX, recharge time becomes less important unless you're a "spray and prey" style photographer. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jamiewexler Goldmember 2,032 posts Likes: 11 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Grafton, MA More info | May 16, 2006 07:12 | #19 I'll disagree a bit on this one. I usually have a couple of instances every wedding where I get a cool shot, only to have a cooler shot appear a millisecond later. The fast recycle time of the CP-E3 means I don't miss those anymore. Also, the cake cutting and feeding sometimes happens really fast - again, I used to miss a shot or two in the sequence while my flash recycled, with the CP-E3 - no more. Another wedding moment when you need a responsive flash is the bouquet toss. Sure you line up and plan to catch it in the air, but then there's often a frantic scuffle by the girls to get th bouquet. CP-E3 means I can get the in-the-air shot and instantly capture the scuffle. Most importantly, with the CP-E3, I can go a whole wedding without changing batteries! Massachusetts Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | May 16, 2006 07:16 | #20 Another view: ambient light means no need to wait for the flash to recharge. Cake cutting and boquet toss are tough situations, I often use off camera flash with a CP-E3 on the slave for the boquet toss, that's as hard a shot as you'll get. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
song4themoon Goldmember 3,039 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Maryland More info | May 16, 2006 07:19 | #21 Interesting statements. The bouqet toss is the most difficult of all "quick" shots to me and its nice to read all these suggestions www.forever-yesterday.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jamiewexler Goldmember 2,032 posts Likes: 11 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Grafton, MA More info | tim wrote: I also hate cords... I agree - I wish they made a wireless one of these! I am constantly bringing my camera to my eye only to have the CP-E3 cord caught in the front of my lens hood! Massachusetts Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 16, 2006 07:55 | #23 LOL Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DocFrankenstein Cream of the Crop 12,324 posts Likes: 13 Joined Apr 2004 Location: where the buffalo roam More info | May 16, 2006 08:36 | #24 The pros I've seen always pose the couple beforehand. Never I've seen it shot as a true candid. National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 16, 2006 08:49 | #25 Never seen that done. Most people would cry to see their cake cut up before the reception, but then again, they don't have to use a piece of the real cake. Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jamiewexler Goldmember 2,032 posts Likes: 11 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Grafton, MA More info | May 16, 2006 08:58 | #26 That's a valid point Doc, and makes it easy to get the best cake shot. It falls in line with a traditional approach to photography, where much of the significant events are posed and lit professionally - leaving nothing to chance. Massachusetts Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 16, 2006 09:02 | #27 Yes, I agree. B&G's day. If they want everything done without posing first, I say, fine and they have to live with it. But the photographer sometimes knows that certain poses and certain angles work best. Should communicate with the couple and be non-intrusive, but convincing. Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sharyn1983 Senior Member 342 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Omaha, soon to be Okinawa More info | May 17, 2006 09:05 | #28 Most brides are open to a mixture of both. You can talk them into poses and suggestions early on in the reception as long as you are considerate of their wishes for candid shots when the cake cutting etc. actually happens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1747 guests, 110 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||