Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk 
Thread started 19 Apr 2006 (Wednesday) 14:59
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which Macro prime lens do you use?"
Canon 60 f2.8
462
11%
Canon 100 f2.8
1941
46%
Canon 180 f3.5
143
3.4%
Sigma 50 f2.8
100
2.4%
Sigma 105 f2.8
257
6.1%
Sigma 150 f2.8
264
6.3%
Sigma 180 f3.5
62
1.5%
Tamron 90 f2.8
268
6.4%
Tamron 180 f3.5
46
1.1%
Tokina 100 f2.8
54
1.3%
Canon MPE65
220
5.2%
Canon 50mm f2.5
128
3%
Canon 100 f2.8L IS
264
6.3%
Tamron 60mm F/2.0 1:1 SP Macro
3
0.1%
Sigma 70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro
3
0.1%
Zeiss 50mm f/2 Makro-Planar
0
0%
Zeiss 100mm f/2 Makro-Planar
0
0%
LAOWA 60mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens
1
0%

3839 voters, 4216 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

-=TOP TEN=- Which macro lens do you use? New models added

 
JDUPhoto
Member
Avatar
122 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
May 03, 2006 05:55 as a reply to  @ post 1469462 |  #46

Mount Airy Ed wrote:
Hi, I'm on a budget and would like to get both a zoom and macro lens in one. I see mostly fixed macro lenses used here. In a few posts, I've seen the Sigma 70-300mm APO DG Macro. What's your opinion of that lens? What are the zoom/macros that are better than that one?

Thanks!
Ed

Ed, you may be looking for an impossible combination. Many lenses claim to be macro, but don't come anywhere near 1:1 magnification. The lens you've asked about achieves no better than 1:2 and that's at a minimum focussing distance of 1.5m (59.1 inches). However, that magnification is a good deal better than you'll get from most zoom lenses, so may not be a bad option if 1:2 is macro enough for you. It would no doubt be a good choice for butterflies and other larger subjects.


Cheers from down under, John
JDU Photography http://pbase.com/jduph​oto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
26,464 posts
Gallery: 2291 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 8546
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
May 03, 2006 06:35 as a reply to  @ post 1469462 |  #47

Mount Airy Ed wrote:
Hi, I'm on a budget and would like to get both a zoom and macro lens in one. I see mostly fixed macro lenses used here. In a few posts, I've seen the Sigma 70-300mm APO DG Macro. What's your opinion of that lens? What are the zoom/macros that are better than that one?

Thanks!
Ed

A lot of zooms have macro in the title and on the focus ring. This is really a marketting gimick and indicates some close focus capability.

A real macro lens will be specialy designed for very high resolution, low chromatic aberation and good flatness of field over a large magnification range. They can normally focus unaided to at least life size. Most modern macro lenses also perform well at conventional distances.

You can use zooms with tubes to get higher magnification but aparantly this introduces more chromatic aberation than one gets with a good prime. However some people have published pics with the kit lens etc that look very good on the web - I don't know how good they are if printed at A3 or larger.

If you are a budget get tubes and use tham with a good prime, if you don't have a good prime get the 50/1.8 if really stuck for cash.


My Photography Home Page (external link) RSS Feed (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Carzee
Cream of the Crop
6,528 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Canberra
     
May 03, 2006 06:43 |  #48

Nil.
No macro. Am I the only one without macro glass?

I plan on re-acquiring a Kiron 105 f2.8 if I see one.


Having a bad day? Feeling down? Bantar Gebang Attitude Enhancement Images (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kwsanders
Goldmember
Avatar
1,259 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Hayden, AL
     
May 08, 2006 12:37 |  #49

The macro that I use is not on the list, so I thought I would mention it here. I have the 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro. It is half lifesize (1:2). I hope to purchase the 100mm f/2.8 macro in the near future.


Kerry Sanders | flickr (external link)
60D w/BG-E9 grip, 20D w/BG-E2 grip, 400mm f/5.6L, 70-200mm f/4L, 17-40 f/4L, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 50mm f/1.4, Canon 1.4x II Extender, 580EX Flash
Manfrotto MK190XPRO3-BH with 496RC2 Ball Head
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reyno
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,037 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
     
May 15, 2006 21:47 |  #50

Tamron 90mm 2.8. Just got it today.


Best regards - Reyno
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/reyno/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
35mm
Senior Member
Avatar
268 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: bne
     
May 16, 2006 00:02 |  #51

I have an extension ring. i can't afford a lense


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob ­ Boner
Member
90 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2005
     
May 19, 2006 09:10 |  #52

I use the Canon 180. I have used Minolta 50mm, Vivitar 90mm,Nikon 55, 105, and 200mm, and the Çanon 180. I like the 180 the best. I think it is one of the top two lenses Canon makes (300 f/2.8 is possibly as good). I highly recommend it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgravel
Senior Member
Avatar
307 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Gatineau, PQ, Canada
     
May 31, 2006 20:25 |  #53

I just voted for the Canon 100, because I just ordered one from B&H moments ago :cool:

Can't wait to receive it :)


Robert Gravel www.robertgravel.ca/ (external link)
EOS 7D + grip, EF 400 f5.6 L, EF 70-200 f4 I.S. L, EF 17-40 f4 L, EF 24-105 L, EF 100 f2.8 macro, EF 40 Pancake, 430 EX II, 430 EX, S90, EOS Elan 7N

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpastern
Cream of the Crop
13,765 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
     
May 31, 2006 20:52 |  #54
bannedPermanent ban

Sigma 150mm :) Got it a few days ago, still getting used to it, it's a lot heavier than my 50mm/kenko tube setup - with my flash, flash bracket and 1D the whole lot is around 3kg I'd say. I swear the Sigma is heavier than both my Canon 70-200 f2.8 and 300mm f4 ;) Excellent build quality and feel, and the optical quality is very very sharp, top notch. Sharper than my Canon 50mm f1.8, and that's a reasonably sharp lens I believe.

After having just spent 3-4 months getting my focusing technique down to pat with the 50mm/tubes combo I'm having to start all over again with the Sigma, most of my shots so far have been pretty disappointing from my end. I did get a few good shots of ants and a jumper yesterday though, haven't processed them yet ;)

For those looking at a macro lens, and not wanting to cart around a heavy lens, go for the Canon 100mm as it's smaller and lighter and easier to handle than the Sigma 150mm (but no better in image quality).

The Sigma's AF isn't too bad at all - the HSM is silent, and it's pretty accurate. It's a tad too slow, but it'll only affect you if you're trying to use it for sports/action etc. Normal usage, the AF speed is fine.

Dave

edited: I failed to mention originally that the Sigma represents fantastic value for money, and the optical performance is every bit as good as the Canon 180mm f3.5L as far as I'm concerned. I'm sure some will disagree with me on that one ;)


http://www.macro-images.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
benca1
Senior Member
Avatar
480 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: San Jose
     
Jun 01, 2006 06:35 as a reply to  @ dpastern's post |  #55
bannedPermanent ban

dpastern wrote:
edited: I failed to mention originally that the Sigma represents fantastic value for money, and the optical performance is every bit as good as the Canon 180mm f3.5L as far as I'm concerned. I'm sure some will disagree with me on that one ;)

The Canon 180mm L has some of the worst vignetting going for a macro lens and the saddest MTF numbers I've seen for a macro lens.

FWIW, the highest res lens, theoretically, is the Tamron 90mm which puts all others to shame with virtually no vignetting worth mentioning. Gaspingly sharp wide open. Following the same numbers the next sharpest Macro is the Sigma 105, the Canon 100, and the Sigma 150. The Canon 180 comes in dead last.

For the money, being that the 100mm Canon comes with nothing but a box and the Tamron comes with a 6 year warranty, pouch and hood, it seems sort of short sighted to pass it up for the Canon. Both being less then 500 dollars. (the Tamron is actually about 25 to 50 bucks cheaper). And the 10mm less focal length helps the Tamron better as a portrain lens for APC cameras.

For 350 bucks, it looks like the Sigma 105 is the best bargain going.


30D / BG-E2 / 3021BPRO & 488RC2 / 420EX Flash /
Sigma 18-50EX / 105EX Macro / Canon 70-200L F4 /

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
madferrit
Goldmember
Avatar
1,043 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Jun 01, 2006 06:41 as a reply to  @ benca1's post |  #56

benca1 wrote:
For 350 bucks, it looks like the Sigma 105 is the best bargain going.

I'm so glad you said that, i just purchased this lens from a fellow POTNer.. just can't wait to put it to use :D


My Canon can.. I just need to find out how :rolleyes:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=298914

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sn@ve
Member
Avatar
126 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jun 03, 2006 11:37 |  #57

I only recently acquired the Canon 100mm f 2.8 and I love it. I am virtually certain that I'll end up with the 180mm version at some point in time. It is without a doubt my favorite lens and macro is my favorite genre of photography.


-= Sn@ve =-

www.pbase.com/snave/ga​lleries (external link)

Comments and critique are always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mR_CaESaR
Senior Member
Avatar
354 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jun 11, 2006 21:54 |  #58

im' a sigma 150mm user here, but i'm still learning the art of macro, i really would like to get some pics of flies and butterfiles like the ones i see on this forum, bloody amazing, but i have no idea how they are done.


Buy the best Lens and never buy again!
Buy once and save
Upgrade Your Epson P-3000 to 120gb tutorial (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,384 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4488
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 11, 2006 23:32 as a reply to  @ kwsanders's post |  #59

kwsanders wrote:
The macro that I use is not on the list, so I thought I would mention it here. I have the 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro. It is half lifesize (1:2). I hope to purchase the 100mm f/2.8 macro in the near future.

It really is on the list....


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpastern
Cream of the Crop
13,765 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
     
Jun 12, 2006 00:45 as a reply to  @ mR_CaESaR's post |  #60
bannedPermanent ban

mR_CaESaR wrote:
im' a sigma 150mm user here, but i'm still learning the art of macro, i really would like to get some pics of flies and butterfiles like the ones i see on this forum, bloody amazing, but i have no idea how they are done.

Lots of practice my fellow Sydneyite ;) The Sigma 150mm is a big lens though, it's heavy and solid. I'm getting a few good shots here and there, but it's a lot harder to hold steady than my old 50mm/tubes combo. That all said, the Sigma is a gem!

Dave


http://www.macro-images.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

193,745 views & 0 likes for this thread
-=TOP TEN=- Which macro lens do you use? New models added
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Arkadio
893 guests, 439 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.