digitalfilm wrote:
I've just bought a 30D, and as I already have the 10D and a D60, I am able to compare the three cameras side by side.
Although the 30D is only a slight upgrade from the 20D, I must say that the overall quality of the body materials and 'feel' of the 30D is not as good as my 20D or even the D60. And certainly not what I expected from a 'prosumer' quality camera.
And when you compare the BG-E2 and the older BG-ED3 battery grips, they're miles apart. The BG-E2 being much more 'plastiky' and lacking the overall better quality of my older grips.
Perhaps that's the reason why the 30D is being so heavily discounted at the moment, (mine cost me £804.99 from Jessops) or is it because the Nikon D200 has finally knocked the 20D/30D off of its top spot?
£804.99 is "heavily discounted???" that's about $1433, and that's not discounted at all unless you're getting the lens with it. i got the 30d body for a little under 1400usd from canoga. you're post really doesn't make too much sense. you talk about quality, i'm sure you go by the motto "if it's heavy, it's made better." anywho, i don't feel that the 30d is "not impressive." i do feel that it's not a huge improvement over the 20d, but, the 20d is one hell of a camera! and that makes the 30d slightly better. my $.02