Why in the world would one (one who owns a 200L) want to put a 1.4x II extender on a 135L? Because alone the 135L gives you 1:5.3 magnification. And with the 1.4X II extension tube I reckon the magnification is more like 1:4. I know it aint macro but it gets you in there.
Yes, this sort of thing entertains me while my 100 macro is being serviced by Canon. The first shot is with the 135L alone. The rest are the 135L with the 1.4x II.
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |