Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 24 Apr 2006 (Monday) 00:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Master List of Weatherproofed Lenses

 
peacock
Goldmember
Avatar
1,919 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Hampshire , South Coast UK
     
Apr 24, 2006 14:55 |  #16

shutterghost wrote:
I also had a few questions
1) I'm extremely paranoid about dust. Even thought I know that a few dust specs inside the lens will definately not affect IQ, I just can't feel comfortable knowing it's inside. I was hoping a weather sealed body could give me a better chance at avoiding dust. So the question comes down to: Is it worth having a sealed lens but an "un-sealed" body? I could put up with wiping down the sensor once in a blue moon, but sending off lenses to canon for a wipe down seems like a headache.

Its not a case of one or the other, you would need a weather sealed body and lens to get the protection and even then it is not complete without a filter on the glass of weather sealed zoom .


Just started populating a site with snaps @
www.3cakes.co.uk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Apr 24, 2006 15:06 as a reply to  @ post 1437921 |  #17

Choderboy wrote:
Are you sure about that? (Rhetorical question)
Most canon Ls do not change length when zooming like the "linear zoom" action of the 100-400.
24-105 and 100-400 being the only dust suckers in the L range.

They may not change overall length, but if they didn't move the elements and groups around internally they couldn't either focus or zoom. Changing the size of the internal chambers, however it happens, has a potential to suck in outside air.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KennyG
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
     
Apr 24, 2006 17:15 |  #18

The 28-300 is the same design as the 100-400, only with tighter seals and the gasket. The trombone type zooms do not push or pull any more air than a twist zoom, such as the Sigma 50-500 which in fact moves more air. Even the sealed lenses like the 70-200 move air internally when zoomed.

Another urban myth I'm afraid, usually spread by those with no long-term experience of the items in question.


Ken
Professional Motorsport Photographer
2 x 1D MK-II, 7D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L,
300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Apr 24, 2006 21:01 |  #19

The 100-400mm isn't weathersealed... So its chances of sucking in contaminents are greater than with a weathersealed lens. But sure, the air has to come from somewhere regardless of design. I would imagine the O-rings of sealed lenses decreases the size of the particles that can be sucked in or lowers the chances somewhat.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sergi2
Member
Avatar
73 posts
Joined Feb 2006
     
Oct 04, 2006 06:22 as a reply to  @ post 1435897 |  #20

Cosworth, where is the list of weatherproofed lenses?. Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,943 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Master List of Weatherproofed Lenses
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2812 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.