Exactly...
DoubleNegative *sniffles* 10,533 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2006 Location: New York, USA More info | Apr 28, 2006 09:54 | #16 Exactly... La Vida Leica!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
storeman Senior Member 642 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Oldham, UK More info | Apr 29, 2006 16:53 | #17 Deleting the images simply replaces the first character of the filename which the OS / firmware recognises as the file has been deleted. Formatting clearss the file allocation table (FAT) which removes the pointers to the images and clears the filenames. Formatting is quicker because it changes fewer bytes on the card or disk. Formatting flash memory is less likely to reduce the life of the card than deleting.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Apr 29, 2006 17:45 | #18 Um . . . Formatting the card always clears the File Allocation Tables, which are at a fairly static area on the card; deleting a file changes a byte in a subdirectory which may occur at a random place in the card. If your only concern is getting maximum card life (a dubious exercise in many ways you should always delete files, and periodically (but not every time) delete folders rather than reformat. If you delete the files and folders every time, you're causing the \DCIM\ directory to be rewritten every time, while by letting extra folders build up, you're changing where data's written. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Citizensmith Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 29, 2006 18:49 | #19 The limited write/erase cycles for flash memory is unlikely to ever be a limiting factor for digital photography. My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
YARRO Member 201 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Assen, The Netherlands More info | Apr 29, 2006 23:08 | #20 In a Dutch computer magazine flash memory was tested. Canon 50D + Grip, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L, Canon EF 70-300mm IS USM, Tamron AF17-50MM F/2.8, Canon Speedlite 430 EX + Lumiquest Big Bounce, Gitzo G1564L Monopod + Manfrotto 468 MG RC-0 hydro ballhead, Canon RC RS-80N3, Lowepro Slingshot 200AW.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bones Member 165 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Apr 30, 2006 13:19 | #21 I don't care either....all the ones I own are guaranteed for life. -EOS 20D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Jon wrote: Actually, not quite. Flash memory Doh... but of course, I know enough about memory that I should have considered that! You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnnyG Worthless twinkle toes fairy 3,719 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Houston, Texas More info | May 02, 2006 20:48 | #23 Let's see here. If the flash cards are good for 100,000 cycles then if I format my card 5 times a day which of course is very high but let's say I did, then the life of the card would be approx. 54 and 3/4 years if I did that right but either way, that's a very long time and me and my camera and cards and everything else will be history! Canon EOS 5D Mark II, 100-400IS L, 24-105 L[COLOR=black][FONT="] IS, 50mm f/1.4, Canon 430EX/580EX II, Kenko 1.5X, Epson R1900, Manfrotto 679B Monopod, 3021BPRO tripod, 808RC4 Head, 486RC2 Ballhead
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 977 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||