Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 25 Apr 2006 (Tuesday) 16:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Fact or Fiction - Memory card life?

 
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Apr 28, 2006 09:54 |  #16

Exactly...


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
storeman
Senior Member
642 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Oldham, UK
     
Apr 29, 2006 16:53 |  #17

Deleting the images simply replaces the first character of the filename which the OS / firmware recognises as the file has been deleted. Formatting clearss the file allocation table (FAT) which removes the pointers to the images and clears the filenames. Formatting is quicker because it changes fewer bytes on the card or disk. Formatting flash memory is less likely to reduce the life of the card than deleting.


My Gear List.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Apr 29, 2006 17:45 |  #18

Um . . . Formatting the card always clears the File Allocation Tables, which are at a fairly static area on the card; deleting a file changes a byte in a subdirectory which may occur at a random place in the card. If your only concern is getting maximum card life (a dubious exercise in many ways you should always delete files, and periodically (but not every time) delete folders rather than reformat. If you delete the files and folders every time, you're causing the \DCIM\ directory to be rewritten every time, while by letting extra folders build up, you're changing where data's written.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Citizensmith
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,387 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
     
Apr 29, 2006 18:49 |  #19

The limited write/erase cycles for flash memory is unlikely to ever be a limiting factor for digital photography.

It's different in the hard drive world though. A few companies are looking at flash as a way of either providing hard drives with a much improved cache, or replacing them all together. Suddenly 100,000 write/erase cycles is something you could be hitting in months. Be interesting to see how they come up with ways around it.


My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
Tradition - Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YARRO
Member
Avatar
201 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Assen, The Netherlands
     
Apr 29, 2006 23:08 |  #20

In a Dutch computer magazine flash memory was tested.
After several hundreds of thousands of write/cycles they stopped the test for practical reasons, the deadline for the magazine.
The flash cards all worked as if fresh out of the box and will most certainly outlast the camera and probably it's owner.


Canon 50D + Grip, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L, Canon EF 70-300mm IS USM, Tamron AF17-50MM F/2.8, Canon Speedlite 430 EX + Lumiquest Big Bounce, Gitzo G1564L Monopod + Manfrotto 468 MG RC-0 hydro ballhead, Canon RC RS-80N3, Lowepro Slingshot 200AW.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bones
Member
Avatar
165 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Apr 30, 2006 13:19 |  #21

I don't care either....all the ones I own are guaranteed for life.

Bones


-EOS 20D.
-EF-S 17-85mm IS USM.
-BG-E2 Grip.

-Mamiya 645-1000s (Film).
-AE Prism Finder.
-Sekkor 80mm Lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 02, 2006 20:36 as a reply to  @ post 1449731 |  #22

Jon wrote:
Actually, not quite. Flash memory (external link) (CF cards) undergoes a state change when you write to it; DRAM only maintains the signal as long as power's supplied. That's why it's "Dynamic". It's the changes that flash goes through as it's written that are the limiting factors.

Doh... but of course, I know enough about memory that I should have considered that!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnnyG
Worthless twinkle toes fairy
Avatar
3,719 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
     
May 02, 2006 20:48 |  #23

Let's see here. If the flash cards are good for 100,000 cycles then if I format my card 5 times a day which of course is very high but let's say I did, then the life of the card would be approx. 54 and 3/4 years if I did that right but either way, that's a very long time and me and my camera and cards and everything else will be history!

So, I'm not worried about formatting my cards which I do every time after I use them!

So, there.........


Canon EOS 5D Mark II, 100-400IS L, 24-105 L[COLOR=black][FONT=&qu​ot] IS, 50mm f/1.4, Canon 430EX/580EX II, Kenko 1.5X, Epson R1900, Manfrotto 679B Monopod, 3021BPRO tripod, 808RC4 Head, 486RC2 Ballhead

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,443 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
Fact or Fiction - Memory card life?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
977 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.