285mm,ISO 100, 1/800, f5.6, handheld with 100-400L
I took this at the SF Zoo. RAW photo processed with ACR and sharpening applied in CS2
col4bin Goldmember 2,264 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: San Francisco, CA More info | May 05, 2006 01:23 | #1 285mm,ISO 100, 1/800, f5.6, handheld with 100-400L Frank
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeWhy "Monkey's uncle" 10,596 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Pasadena, CA More info | May 05, 2006 02:41 | #2 feels a bit over exposed, also I'd consider lightening up the eyes for more pop. Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beachgirl Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | I just added a little saturation. Hope its ok. Cool pic though.So how did you like the zoo? I haven't been there in years. How is it compared to Oakland Zoo??
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I don't mind. It looks much better. Frank
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | May 05, 2006 18:43 | #5 A regal critter for sure. The image lacks contrast or saturation (I can't see the post with added saturation for some reason). The image also looks almost distorted. Like it was stretched or shrunk. Most noticeable in the face, between the eyes but then I don't see a lot of lions in my normal days travels. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Meaty0 Goldmember 3,519 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane, Australia More info | Well on my monitor, the first image looks a tad undersaturated (if that's a real word) and BG's looks a tad overdone (sorry BG) but it might just be my monitor.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beachgirl Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | Meaty0 wrote: Well on my monitor, the first image looks a tad undersaturated (if that's a real word) and BG's looks a tad overdone (sorry BG) but it might just be my monitor. Technically I'm not an expert, but I can pass on a helpful tip I learned recently; If you think you may do more animal photography or zoo photography, get yourself a Monopod. They allow you to shoot slower speeds and wider apertures and get better bokeh in the background. You get much sharper images and they're fairly easy to lug around with your camera attached, and best of all, they're not too expensive. I love mine! No worries Meaty0. It's your monitor LOL! ( JK )
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2344 guests, 102 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||