Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 05 May 2006 (Friday) 09:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need a little advice.

 
RuggerJoe
Senior Member
Avatar
899 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Carbondale, IL, USA
     
May 05, 2006 09:43 |  #1

OK I'm not shooting a wedding, but a friend's father's birthday party at a hall. So I figured its pretty close and you all might be able to help me out a little. I have no idea what the lighting will be like.

I've got 2 lens choices: my 17-85 f/4 and my 50 f/1.8. I know the 50mm would be better for ambient light and DOF but I like the flexibility of the zoom and the 50mm might be a little long on my 350D. Anyways I plan on using my 580ex on a flash bracket anyways. But what would be the best settings for both? f/8 at sync speed? or open them up wide for better blur of the background? or something completely different?


Joe

Comments / critiques always welcome.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/ruggerjoe/ (external link)
Canon 350D
EF-S 17-85 IS USM | EF 50 1.8 | EF 70-300 IS | 580EX | a couple of kit lenses
All of which are all better than my skills.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beaconlightboy
Senior Member
269 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: PA
     
May 05, 2006 10:22 |  #2

i usually shoot F8 @ 60 or F5.6 @ 30. use ETTL for flash expsosure. a neat trick to getting great exposures is to FEL the face of the person, then recompose and take your shot. Just be sure to FEL on the person with the fairest skin.

the only time you really want to blur out the background (2.x -3.x) is if you intentionally want to draw attention to the subject

my 2 cents.


Canon 30D
Canon 20D - backup
Canon 24-70L
Canon 70-200L
Canon 28-135 f/3.5-f/5.6 USM-IS
Canon 70-300 USM-IS
(1) 580EX
(2) 550EX
(1) 420EX

Still trying to figure out the darn E-TTL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RuggerJoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
899 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Carbondale, IL, USA
     
May 09, 2006 12:45 |  #3

Thanks Beaconlightboy.

Anyone else?


Joe

Comments / critiques always welcome.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/ruggerjoe/ (external link)
Canon 350D
EF-S 17-85 IS USM | EF 50 1.8 | EF 70-300 IS | 580EX | a couple of kit lenses
All of which are all better than my skills.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
song4themoon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
     
May 09, 2006 13:13 |  #4

Well my personal style includes a lot of background blurr so I like to keep the aperture as wide as possible. I would probly use aperture priority and set it to the widest point your lens will do and then have the camera set the shutter for you


www.forever-yesterday.com (external link)

Gear: 2 Canon 1Ds Mark II, 2 Canon EOS 20D , 580EX flash, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS USM, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 24-70L 2.8, CanonEF 100mm 2.8 USM, Canon EF 85mm 1.8, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Sigma 20mm f1.8, Peleng Fisheye, 3 AB 800 w/ Pocket Wizzards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beaconlightboy
Senior Member
269 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: PA
     
May 09, 2006 13:19 |  #5

not a bad idea, just remember you will lose the ability to control how exposed the background will be. i usuall take a few test shots at different shutter speeds and then pick the one i think provides the best color saturation and exposure of the background.

but i guess if you are going to blur out the background totally the exposure wont really matter as you cant make out whats back there anyway. but it's nice to be able to tell what was going on at the event in the background. sets the pictures mood.


Canon 30D
Canon 20D - backup
Canon 24-70L
Canon 70-200L
Canon 28-135 f/3.5-f/5.6 USM-IS
Canon 70-300 USM-IS
(1) 580EX
(2) 550EX
(1) 420EX

Still trying to figure out the darn E-TTL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
May 09, 2006 15:20 as a reply to  @ beaconlightboy's post |  #6

my personal preference is to use as much ambient light as possible. Sometimes, I can get away with using just a 50 1.8 with NO flash all night for candids. If there isn't enough light, I set the camera to manual, and keep the aperture wide and shutter around the 1/40-1/60 range to get as much light in as I can. Then I fill the rest in with my 580 on a bracket with a lumiquest softbox. I'm almost always shooting 1600 for indoor evening events. I'm not sure how nice 1600 is on the 350D, but it is great on the 20D/30D.

It's all personal style. Some would be inclined to bounce everything off the ceiling with higher shutter speeds, but the lighting looks a little fake to me and loses the mood. If your location is just plain ugly anyways, then bounce away!

it's up to your own preference.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beaconlightboy
Senior Member
269 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: PA
     
May 09, 2006 15:22 |  #7

could you post some of your 1600 ISO shots. i am curious to see how well 1600 works. everyone says its ok, but i notice the noise.


Canon 30D
Canon 20D - backup
Canon 24-70L
Canon 70-200L
Canon 28-135 f/3.5-f/5.6 USM-IS
Canon 70-300 USM-IS
(1) 580EX
(2) 550EX
(1) 420EX

Still trying to figure out the darn E-TTL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
song4themoon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
     
May 09, 2006 15:43 |  #8

You definitely see noise with ISO 1600 but its mostly visible in b&w images, not too much in color

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


Those were all taken at 1600 with most of them at an aperature between 1.8 and somewhere around 3
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

www.forever-yesterday.com (external link)

Gear: 2 Canon 1Ds Mark II, 2 Canon EOS 20D , 580EX flash, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS USM, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 24-70L 2.8, CanonEF 100mm 2.8 USM, Canon EF 85mm 1.8, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Sigma 20mm f1.8, Peleng Fisheye, 3 AB 800 w/ Pocket Wizzards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beaconlightboy
Senior Member
269 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: PA
     
May 09, 2006 15:46 |  #9

very nice, i noticed a lot of black and white, and post work, which is ok, but how much time do you put into a pic to clean it up.


Canon 30D
Canon 20D - backup
Canon 24-70L
Canon 70-200L
Canon 28-135 f/3.5-f/5.6 USM-IS
Canon 70-300 USM-IS
(1) 580EX
(2) 550EX
(1) 420EX

Still trying to figure out the darn E-TTL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
song4themoon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
     
May 09, 2006 15:49 |  #10

Some pictures I keep the way they are noise and all because it just works for them. Some others I run through reduce noise twice to clean them up.

I heared people using programs to reduce noise but I havent found anything that I like.

I think that in b&w images the noise can be quite attractive.. but everyone has a different taste there.

Rather then using a program to reduce noise.. if you dont like them then use other methods but shooting on 1600... just my oppinion though


www.forever-yesterday.com (external link)

Gear: 2 Canon 1Ds Mark II, 2 Canon EOS 20D , 580EX flash, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS USM, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 24-70L 2.8, CanonEF 100mm 2.8 USM, Canon EF 85mm 1.8, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Sigma 20mm f1.8, Peleng Fisheye, 3 AB 800 w/ Pocket Wizzards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beaconlightboy
Senior Member
269 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: PA
     
May 09, 2006 15:53 |  #11

i agree the noise isnt really an issue in 1600 at all for the most part. i have hesitated using 1600 because i fear i will find a way to ruin the pics. but, i think i'm going to try some at my next wedding. by the way, i like the pics.


Canon 30D
Canon 20D - backup
Canon 24-70L
Canon 70-200L
Canon 28-135 f/3.5-f/5.6 USM-IS
Canon 70-300 USM-IS
(1) 580EX
(2) 550EX
(1) 420EX

Still trying to figure out the darn E-TTL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
song4themoon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
     
May 09, 2006 15:54 |  #12

At 1600 you cant really ruin anything. Yes in the b&w you will see noise but not to a point that the picture would be ruined. If anything then it just adds the special touch... give it a go.
I think you can ruin more with a wrong used flash than a high ISO


www.forever-yesterday.com (external link)

Gear: 2 Canon 1Ds Mark II, 2 Canon EOS 20D , 580EX flash, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS USM, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 24-70L 2.8, CanonEF 100mm 2.8 USM, Canon EF 85mm 1.8, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Sigma 20mm f1.8, Peleng Fisheye, 3 AB 800 w/ Pocket Wizzards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,194 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Need a little advice.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1747 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.