Well gosh..I've got the darn thing now.
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer  More info | May 05, 2006 21:46 | #16 Well gosh..I've got the darn thing now. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pcasciola wrote: S3 IS would be cool too, but I always go with something that fits in my pocket. Believe it or not, the Casio Exilim S2 was my camera of choice for events like those. Someone borrowed it and broke the LCD and it's not made anymore, but I'm looking to pick one up off eBay. Really tiny and light, fits in the front pocket of jeans without really noticing it's there, and it records the same (or more) memories as my 20D. I say more because on trips like those it's ALWAYS in my pocket and ready to go where the 20D is often left behind. Having said that, on the day I DID bring my 20D with me, I'd probably go with my 10-22 and/or 70-200/2.8L IS. My dad has a G2 that I could borrow for the trip. I carried my 20D with the 70-200/2.8L IS for 2 days at Disneyland last month. It did get a bit heavy, but I did get some good shots.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion  9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | May 06, 2006 08:53 | #18 But, the OP also stated that he was dissapointed with the low light performance of his current lens. How do you think a P&S would stack up? Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
incendy Goldmember  2,118 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Orange County More info | May 06, 2006 09:42 | #19 I have taken the kit lens, the 70-200 and the 35L.. needless to say the 35L was the perfect length and produced the best pictures by a wide margin. Although for the parades and kids playing in the water, I did love the 70-200 Canon 5d with 35mm 1.4L, 24-70mm 2.8L and 135mm 2.0L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightRules Return of the Jedi  9,911 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2005 More info | May 06, 2006 11:01 | #20 We've got the so-Cal annual pass and hit up Disneyland about once every 3 or so weeks, just for a few hours. I've taken all sorts of combos, but I agree with Phil: take the P&S. Especially if you've got little tykes to care for (as I do), the P&S is plenty camera for the job. If no kids, then maybe it's another story. But I'm in the "pack-lite" camp on the Disneyland debate. We take our S400 Elph now, and that's about it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
foto202 Senior Member  751 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Va Beach More info | May 06, 2006 11:21 | #21 I just got back from Disneyworld last week. I took all of my gear. I mostly used the 24-70L. I also got a whole bunch of good pics with the 70-200 2.8L. There were times when the 24-70 was on that I wish it could go a bit more wide. I did bring the 10-22 but when you're at Disney it's nice to not stop and change lenses. I have now made up my mind to purchase the 17-55 2.8 IS. I think this would serve me pretty well. Ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1113 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
