A white daffodil with orange trumpet.
AnthonyJHowe Cream of the Crop 6,935 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Rhos-on-sea UK More info | May 06, 2006 06:23 | #1 |
Dimitri_V Cream of the Crop 9,221 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Scotland More info | May 06, 2006 06:41 | #2 Permanent banAnthony,i think EV +1/3 would be better,not very good detail recorded on the whites,too bright. My site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AnthonyJHowe THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,935 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Rhos-on-sea UK More info | dv2004 wrote: Anthony,i think EValue +1/3 would be better,not very good detail recorded on the whites,too bright. Even better still,raw. Lovely colours and nicely blured bg though. Thanks for the tip. Next time I'll try EV at +1/3 Canon 5D + Canon 20D + Canon EOS 300
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GaryFairhead Cream of the Crop More info | May 06, 2006 15:54 | #4 Dimitri can correct me but I think he meant -1/3. Adding +1/3 or more exposure compensation will only lighten the shot more and increase the loss of details.I would reduce the exposure by compensating -1/3, -2/3 . Underexposing the whites would give you more detail in the flower and the background would improve too I think. I see you have Image Editing OK. some post processing can help a little ..I ran the shot through PS CS2...darkenned the shot in variations, reduced the saturation -20 in levels, burned the flower with a large soft brush ( large enough to cover most of each petal and then just 1 tap on the mouse), used a smaller brush to lightly burn the yellow on the outside center. Anthony..If you want I can remove the edited shot at your request. Gary Fairhead C/C welcome .....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AnthonyJHowe THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,935 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Rhos-on-sea UK More info | May 06, 2006 15:57 | #5 No I love the the improved image. Canon 5D + Canon 20D + Canon EOS 300
LOG IN TO REPLY |
catsith Mighty Award Winner 6,265 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2006 Location: brisbane australia More info | May 06, 2006 20:07 | #6 |
mrclark321 Noinker 7,537 posts Likes: 23 Joined Mar 2005 Location: .... with a long history More info | May 09, 2006 12:05 | #7 Nice shot Tony, what is the purple background? Sony A7R3 & A7R4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RuggerJoe Senior Member 899 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Carbondale, IL, USA More info | May 09, 2006 12:08 | #8 Nice colors...a tounch over exposed, but nice. Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
spencer87 Goldmember 1,128 posts Joined Apr 2005 More info | May 09, 2006 12:13 | #9 nice shot tony, thought i do think gary's edit is an improvement
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dimitri_V Cream of the Crop 9,221 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Scotland More info | Permanent banGary Fairhead wrote: Dimitri can correct me but I think he meant -1/3. Adding +1/3 or more exposure compensation will only lighten the shot more and increase the loss of details.I would reduce the exposure by compensating -1/3, -2/3 . Underexposing the whites would give you more detail in the flower and the background would improve too I think. I see you have Image Editing OK. some post processing can help a little ..I ran the shot through PS CS2...darkenned the shot in variations, reduced the saturation -20 in levels, burned the flower with a large soft brush ( large enough to cover most of each petal and then just 1 tap on the mouse), used a smaller brush to lightly burn the yellow on the outside center. Anthony..If you want I can remove the edited shot at your request. ![]() Sorry for not responding earlyer guys,i didn`t notice it. My site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2837 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||