Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 10 May 2006 (Wednesday) 09:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM

 
Gaarryy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,191 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Sep 2010
Location: The Colony-- texas
     
Sep 22, 2010 16:03 |  #541

Just got mine today, Cast came off my hand yesterday, lets hope it's strong enough to hold it


---------------Camera, Lens, Flash stuff.. but still wanting more

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_N
Goldmember
Avatar
1,182 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Mansfield, UK
     
Sep 23, 2010 13:37 |  #542

Okay, I don't get it - everyone seems to say the non-IS version of this lens is the worst of the 70-200 L's, but I'm not seeing that here, in fact I'd say these look the best from the last few pages.

Am I missing something?



flickr (external link) (magsnorton)
: Google+ (external link) : My Site (external link) : 5oopx (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhoag
Senior Member
Avatar
723 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Houston-Austin areas - Texas
     
Sep 23, 2010 13:47 as a reply to  @ John_N's post |  #543

Not from my experience. I prefer the non-IS 2.8 version over the IS (version 1) - it is sharper. I don't know about the new IS version 2 - haven't tried it.

JH


_______________
1Dx | 1Ds Mark II | 5D Mark II + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 135L F/2 | 35L F/1.4 | 70-200L II IS f/2.8 | 70-200L F/2.8 | 24-105L F/4 IS | 85 F/1.8 | 50 F/1.4 | 70-300 IS

Smugmug (external link) : Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_N
Goldmember
Avatar
1,182 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Mansfield, UK
     
Sep 23, 2010 14:25 |  #544

Thats interesting to hear - so just keep the speed high and not only did you save a fortune but the IQ's better :)



flickr (external link) (magsnorton)
: Google+ (external link) : My Site (external link) : 5oopx (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,726 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Sep 23, 2010 14:38 |  #545

John_N wrote in post #10964554 (external link)
Okay, I don't get it - everyone seems to say the non-IS version of this lens is the worst of the 70-200 L's, but I'm not seeing that here, in fact I'd say these look the best from the last few pages.

Am I missing something?

John, I have to be honest with you. I've NEVER heard that said about the 70-200 f/2.8L If anything we've always said that the non-IS was sharper than the IS because there is less glass inside and it's less complicated. From what I hear, the new IS II has CAUGHT UP to the sharpness of the original Non-IS.

It's definitely an excellent lens and I've been using it for years. I never have and still don't feel a need to upgrade. IS is a crutch in my opinion. I've got on just fine without it ;)


-Abram-
www.goglanianphoto.com (external link)
500px (external link) / Flickr (external link)
Tumblr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisMc73
Goldmember
Avatar
3,212 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
     
Sep 23, 2010 15:28 |  #546

agphotography wrote in post #10964905 (external link)
John, I have to be honest with you. I've NEVER heard that said about the 70-200 f/2.8L If anything we've always said that the non-IS was sharper than the IS because there is less glass inside and it's less complicated. From what I hear, the new IS II has CAUGHT UP to the sharpness of the original Non-IS.

It's definitely an excellent lens and I've been using it for years. I never have and still don't feel a need to upgrade. IS is a crutch in my opinion. I've got on just fine without it ;)

I'm about to try to sell my 70-200 f/2.8 IS, I just haven't been real happy with it.
We'll see.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,726 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Sep 23, 2010 19:07 |  #547

i can sing nothing but praises for the f/2.8L. I mean sure I wish it was weather sealed (but then again my cameras aren't fully sealed since I don't have a 1D anymore). It's just a great super sharp lens. I'm pretty picky and always looking to find some kind of issue, but that is one lens that has never needed any kind of adjustment or repair or anything. It just works. Consistently.


-Abram-
www.goglanianphoto.com (external link)
500px (external link) / Flickr (external link)
Tumblr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S-S
frustrating simple something
Avatar
8,755 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
     
Sep 24, 2010 16:01 |  #548

tjaudet829 wrote in post #10955206 (external link)
Very nice S-S

thank you :)

i originally bought this lens to save a little cash on the IS version, and now im very glad to have it. recently i had the choice of keeping this or an almost brand new IS version which came with a bulk secondhand gear purchase - it was a no-brainer.

the IS seemed good and was pretty sharp on testing but the amount of money i could sell it for decided me in about 2 seconds. my non IS is very crisp, has less moving parts which means less trips to the repair shop (have already had IS replaced in another lens and it's never been the same since) and i can hold it steady at pretty slow shutter speeds so my non-IS is a keeper, will never sell it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spacemunkie
Goldmember
Avatar
1,549 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 187
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 24, 2010 23:35 |  #549

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4039/4410664310_7aeeba0e50_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/spacemunkie/4​410664310/  (external link)
Iroquois Door Gunner (external link) by Spacemunkie (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4074/4867338089_a3c6778d71_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/spacemunkie/4​867338089/  (external link)
Ramshackle Barn (external link) by Spacemunkie (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2764/4307341677_b063b5e772_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/spacemunkie/4​307341677/  (external link)
Tangimoana Beach (external link) by Spacemunkie (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4006/4317018749_7343b7326b_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/spacemunkie/4​317018749/  (external link)
NZ Motocross GP, 30/1/10 (external link) by Spacemunkie (external link), on Flickr

Flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Craggles123
Senior Member
339 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2010
     
Sep 26, 2010 03:03 |  #550

Original shot was blown out, thought I'd have a play with it anyways.

Kept me entertained on a sunday afternoon :)

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4092/5024917851_059be07b62_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/47697753@N04/5​024917851/  (external link)
Grace at the River (external link) by Craig Hugo (external link), on Flickr

| Canon 5DmkIII | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS IIL | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 | Canon 430EX II|
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ldawg1
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Feb 2010
     
Sep 26, 2010 18:51 as a reply to  @ Craggles123's post |  #551

The results of grabbing the camera for a couple of unplanned shots yesterday arvo.

Shot on a 70-200mm f/2.8L.

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4087/5027956234_722ca451b5_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/47769003@N03/5​027956234/  (external link)
Rainbow Lorikeet (external link) by linden_b (external link), on Flickr

EOS 50D | 135mm f/2L | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Craggles123
Senior Member
339 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2010
     
Sep 26, 2010 20:22 |  #552

Turned out sicko


| Canon 5DmkIII | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS IIL | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 | Canon 430EX II|
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Marshal.F
Senior Member
Avatar
295 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Georgia
     
Sep 27, 2010 01:36 as a reply to  @ Craggles123's post |  #553

i finally broke down and bought myself a 70-200 f/2.8L. Its an awesome lens but so far the plan is to keep it for a month, and if i don't end up using it enough ill sell it and grab a 135 f/2.0L or maybe a tilt-shift lens, who knows yet. Any way here is a shot taken with my 70-200.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Canon 50D with grip/ Tamron 17-50mm f2.8/ Canon 70-200 f2.8/ Canon 85mm f1.8
http://www.wix.com/mf0​23235/marshalf (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/photosbymarshal (external link)
http://marshalf.blogsp​ot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin.D
Goldmember
Avatar
2,460 posts
Gallery: 150 photos
Likes: 4094
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Brit living in Germany
     
Sep 28, 2010 00:57 as a reply to  @ Marshal.F's post |  #554

I have the chance of picking one of these up for €750 wich is around €200 less for a used one - its well used and small scratches on the front lens.. not sure what to do..

EDIT: ok, nothing to loose so I pushed the buy now button ;)


Web Site (external link)
Facebook (external link)
Instagram (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Canon 5D Mark IV + Canon 90D + Glass

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waterrockets
Goldmember
Avatar
3,945 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 311
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Austin (near TX)
     
Sep 28, 2010 14:13 |  #555

I bought this lens to reach across a little bigger field, and it's doing awesome.

IMAGE: http://waterrockets.smugmug.com/Sports/Soccer/Galaxy-Soccer-Sept-19-2010/IMG8000/1014284011_N3UeZ-XL.jpg

IMAGE: http://waterrockets.smugmug.com/Sports/Soccer/Soccer-Sisters-Sept-18-2010/IMG7642/1013085694_BFyAx-XL.jpg

IMAGE: http://waterrockets.smugmug.com/Sports/Soccer/Dragons-Soccer-Sept-18-2010/IMG7880/1013503020_GGshV-XL.jpg

1D MkIV | 1D MkIII | 550D w/grip & ML| EF 70-200mm f2.8L| EF 24-105mm f4L IS | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC | 430EXii | EF 50mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

896,242 views & 360 likes for this thread, 512 members have posted to it and it is followed by 52 members.
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
525 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.