Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 13 May 2006 (Saturday) 09:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Second Wedding - trying hard not to blow highlights

 
shogton
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Mar 2004
     
May 13, 2006 09:17 |  #1

Hi all,

Long time lurker here. I have recently shot my second wedding for friends and would value your opinion.

http://www.hogton.com …-%20Ben%20and%20Carol.h​tm (external link)

The day was perfect for the couple, first day of bright sunshine this year. I had a hard time trying to control the exposure so as to not blow the highlights all the time. My 300D loves to overexpose in bright sunlight.

I ended up shooting in TV mode and adjusting the shutter speed till the meter was -2/3 in the viewfinder then double checking the histogram afterwards. Fill-in flash didn't seem to help much on my test shots, so I didn't bother for most. Thankfully, shooting RAW and the Photoshop Shadow/Highlight tool saved the day.

Indoors, I used 550EX where possible with an Omnibounce except the reception room had a high, pointy ceiling and obviously the church was a no go.

Still, we all had a great day and the couple love the photos, I am busy printing them for their album now..

All the best,

Stu.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
song4themoon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
     
May 13, 2006 09:42 |  #2

I really like the ones inside the church... you used flash for those, right? Did you bounce or had it straight on?


www.forever-yesterday.com (external link)

Gear: 2 Canon 1Ds Mark II, 2 Canon EOS 20D , 580EX flash, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS USM, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 24-70L 2.8, CanonEF 100mm 2.8 USM, Canon EF 85mm 1.8, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Sigma 20mm f1.8, Peleng Fisheye, 3 AB 800 w/ Pocket Wizzards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tony ­ fanning
Senior Member
Avatar
834 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Colwyn Bay,North Wales, UK
     
May 14, 2006 06:05 |  #3

Nicely done-you are brave putting such large, unprotected pics on your site.Unscrupulous clients could get a 7 x 5 off them without paying you!


Regards, Tony
Gear list
Better flash technique (external link)

conwy wedding photographer (external link)
north wales wedding photograper (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nidz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,408 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2005
Location: VIC, Australia
     
May 14, 2006 06:54 |  #4

You had a nice old church location and from what looks to be a bright and sunny day so you were already ahead before you started but some nice shots. Good job.


Stop or I'll Shoot!
10 Years on POTN Forums!
Canon 350D | 70-200f/4L | ef35-105mm | ef100-300mm | 50mm f1.8 etc..
Some of my Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shogton
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Mar 2004
     
May 14, 2006 14:03 |  #5

Thanks all for the responses.

The bulk of the church ones were done without flash and high ISO due to the vicar not wanting to be put off with flashes during the ceremony. I was allowed flash down the aisle and after the actual signing of the registry. I used my F2.8 100mm Macro USM for some and the 18-50mm kit lens for the rest.

I put the images on large so people could see the details, but I understand the risk with my copyright notice being so discreet. Perhaps I should make them a little smaller in future - very easy to do as the gallery is automated via a program I wrote.

I hope to make weddings another branch to my business tree, so this was a great test for me to see how I held up.

All the best,

Stu.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nuttcraker
Member
Avatar
137 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Lisbon
     
May 14, 2006 15:23 |  #6

Hi! I' was wondering the same thing as "Song4themoon". I've done my first wedding this weekend and using Flash in a old portuguese church with no light was very difficult. What was the iso that you've used? i promisse to put my photos for you to coment!

Bests


With enough light, you can turn a white wall black. (Master Strobist)

Gear List (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drews578
Member
236 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2005
     
May 14, 2006 16:13 |  #7

Great photographs. The only thing that drives me crazy is when Men hold their crotches in a photograph. I sometimes tell people to not look like they have to go pee.


Cool stuff I don't want stolen. OS 10.7.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pieq314
Goldmember
1,102 posts
Joined Apr 2006
     
May 14, 2006 18:35 |  #8

Great pictures! I am also wondering about the same thing as "Song4themoon" and "Nuttcraker". What ISO did you use? What was the shutter speed? Tripod?

Also, when taking the attached picture, did you use flash light bouncing off the ceiling?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shogton
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Mar 2004
     
May 15, 2006 11:05 |  #9

OK, here is a comparison of two of the shots..

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


The ceiling in this particular area of the church was lower, so allowed some use of bounce. I'm pretty sure I had the omnibounce fitted and pointed at 45 degrees.

The slow shutter speed made the first a little too fuzzy for my liking, but I prefer the lighting in it as it used more of the natural light. The second is sharper, but flatter.

All shots on the day were hand-held as a tripod was too cumbersome.

Hope that helps,

Stu.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jj1987
Goldmember
1,398 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Florida
     
May 15, 2006 11:16 |  #10

The biggest thing that bothers me in the pics is that the group shots, they all have shadows on their face ("bags" under their eyes).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shogton
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Mar 2004
     
May 15, 2006 11:30 |  #11

Good point, I guess I really should've used fill-in flash or changed the location.

Another good reason to use the flash even outdoors was that it lets people know when I have taken the shot. Usually, I had taken 3 or 4 before anyone realised I was done :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Az2Africa
Goldmember
Avatar
3,481 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, Arizona USA
     
May 15, 2006 11:31 |  #12

I think you did a great job. I have to fly to California to shoot a wedding June 11th. Will face some of the same problems. It will be an outdoor affair from 1 to 5pm. Sun directly overhead. I'm praying for it to be overcast, but in the meantime, I'm doing a lot of practice shots using a number of reflectors to eliminate to shadows. So far I love the results from a large soft gold reflector. My assistant will be as busy as I will.LOL


"If you're not living on the edge. You're taking up too much room !"
My Gear Arizona's POTN Flickr Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nuttcraker
Member
Avatar
137 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Lisbon
     
May 15, 2006 11:50 |  #13

Hi! I was wondering if a soft box could solve the problem of the deep shadows, without bouncing the flash? specialy in churchs...


With enough light, you can turn a white wall black. (Master Strobist)

Gear List (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danedel
Senior Member
Avatar
437 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
May 15, 2006 13:35 |  #14

I would have used a flash, at all times....for fill outside, and for my base light indoors. Useing a diffuser is a must as well :-)


My two favorites, 1D MK II + 70-200 2.8 IS Just cant get them apart :lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sharyn1983
Senior Member
Avatar
342 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Omaha, soon to be Okinawa
     
May 15, 2006 13:42 |  #15

Scout out location outside that won't be in direct sunlight. Partial clouds or shade so people aren't squinting their eyes shut.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,398 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Second Wedding - trying hard not to blow highlights
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1748 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.