Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 May 2006 (Saturday) 14:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 17-55IS now in the USA

 
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
May 20, 2006 07:04 |  #61

24-105mm IS L I would say.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
twotimer
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
May 20, 2006 07:41 as a reply to  @ post 1529304 |  #62

CoolToolGuy wrote:
That says "L-series EF lenses" - not EF-S. Since they have "L" lenses on Powershot cameras and video cameras there is no reason why there couldn't be an EF-S L. But if the 17-55 IS doesn't qualify I don't know what would.
It really doesn't matter what they call it as long as it produces the image quality.

Have Fun,

Those lenses on the Powershot and video cameras are not called L lenses just referred to as having L lens quality.

Gerhard




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
May 20, 2006 08:02 as a reply to  @ twotimer's post |  #63

twotimer wrote:
Those lenses on the Powershot and video cameras are not called L lenses just referred to as having L lens quality.

Gerhard

Take a look at the link (external link) Rick posted a pge or so back; Canon most emphatically calls the lens for the PowerShot Pro 1 an L, complete with red ring.

And the other link above (external link) doesn't state that only lenses that will fit all Canon bodies can be L. It identifies qualities which contribute to a lens being L, but doesn't identify any one as essential. My guess is that they don't make EF-S L lenses because of possible confusion in the buying market, and because they expect that professionals, the target audience, want lenses that they can use without worrying about whether it'll fit on any particular camera. An EF-S L wouldn't meet that latter.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
May 20, 2006 10:37 |  #64

Friends, my test is complete, however it requires password. You can EMAIL me (no PM, I can only do 1 per minute) for it: http://www.pbase.com/l​ightrules/fourpoundsho​wdown (external link) . I'm sorry I've had to do it this way, but I think you'll "enjoy" the test.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightstream
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
May 20, 2006 11:14 |  #65

Great job!!

The 17-55 is breathtaking.. it almost makes me wish I hadn't gone full frame! (and now that I've spent the $$, I can't turn back..)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ W.
Senior Member
841 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
May 20, 2006 12:48 as a reply to  @ Lightstream's post |  #66

Thanks JoJo. Mail sent.


20D, 30D, 500f/4L IS, 300f/4L IS, 300f/2.8L IS, Canon 1.4TC, Canon 2xTC, 70-300IS, 17-85IS, EFS 10-22, Sigma 150 Macro, 3021PRO, RRS BH-40LR, Gitzo 1325, full Wimberley Head v2, Wimberley Sidekick, and a bunch of other stuff. :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
May 20, 2006 13:08 |  #67

Well done Master Ma, but I have to say other than the 17-85 IS they all look pretty similar. I reckon the 17-40mm L looks overall best buy for the cash and I really wouldn't pay the premium for the IS lens over the 18-50mm EX. Maybe my eyes are gone :confused: ;)


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
May 21, 2006 01:28 |  #68

Since we're talking about the whole, "why can't EF-S lenses be L lens" thing, I'll throw in my two cents.

First, L lens denotes a Pro class and there are no cropped Pro body. By pro body, I'm referring to 1DsMII and 1DMII that are currently available. So to me, it would make no sense to have a pro lenses that cannot fit a pro body.

Second, most of the new L lenses are weather sealed. This is of no use on cropped bodies as non of them are weather sealed.

There I've said it now, I feel much better.
LOL


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
May 21, 2006 12:12 |  #69

Just saw the test. Thanks again.
I have three main sources of lens testers, PopPhoto, photozone.de, and jojo.
he he he, I still check out others but none are as methodical and comprehensive.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,466 views & 0 likes for this thread, 34 members have posted to it.
Canon 17-55IS now in the USA
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1139 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.