24-105mm IS L I would say.
condyk Africa's #1 Tour Guide 20,887 posts Likes: 22 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Birmingham, UK More info | May 20, 2006 07:04 | #61 24-105mm IS L I would say. https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1203740
LOG IN TO REPLY |
twotimer Senior Member 252 posts Joined Oct 2005 More info | CoolToolGuy wrote: That says "L-series EF lenses" - not EF-S. Since they have "L" lenses on Powershot cameras and video cameras there is no reason why there couldn't be an EF-S L. But if the 17-55 IS doesn't qualify I don't know what would. It really doesn't matter what they call it as long as it produces the image quality. Have Fun, Those lenses on the Powershot and video cameras are not called L lenses just referred to as having L lens quality.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | twotimer wrote: Those lenses on the Powershot and video cameras are not called L lenses just referred to as having L lens quality. Gerhard Take a look at the link Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 20, 2006 10:37 | #64 Friends, my test is complete, however it requires password. You can EMAIL me (no PM, I can only do 1 per minute) for it: http://www.pbase.com/lightrules/fourpoundshowdown
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lightstream Yoda 14,915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Cult of the Full Frame More info | May 20, 2006 11:14 | #65 Great job!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JackW. Senior Member 841 posts Joined Jun 2003 More info | Thanks JoJo. Mail sent. 20D, 30D, 500f/4L IS, 300f/4L IS, 300f/2.8L IS, Canon 1.4TC, Canon 2xTC, 70-300IS, 17-85IS, EFS 10-22, Sigma 150 Macro, 3021PRO, RRS BH-40LR, Gitzo 1325, full Wimberley Head v2, Wimberley Sidekick, and a bunch of other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
condyk Africa's #1 Tour Guide 20,887 posts Likes: 22 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Birmingham, UK More info | May 20, 2006 13:08 | #67 Well done Master Ma, but I have to say other than the 17-85 IS they all look pretty similar. I reckon the 17-40mm L looks overall best buy for the cash and I really wouldn't pay the premium for the IS lens over the 18-50mm EX. Maybe my eyes are gone https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1203740
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeWhy "Monkey's uncle" 10,596 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Pasadena, CA More info | May 21, 2006 01:28 | #68 Since we're talking about the whole, "why can't EF-S lenses be L lens" thing, I'll throw in my two cents. Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeWhy "Monkey's uncle" 10,596 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Pasadena, CA More info | May 21, 2006 12:12 | #69 Just saw the test. Thanks again. Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1139 guests, 143 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||