Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 14 May 2006 (Sunday) 23:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Hard work but somebody has to do it.

 
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,469 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4570
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 16, 2006 23:23 |  #16

<<And why is he shooting UP at her? Not very flattering angle.>>

But a good portraitist often shoots full length photos from lower than someone's head level, which is best used for head and shoulders and tight headshots. She may be sitting, but her gown is draped in front of her, making her every bit as long as a full length shot!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sharpfocus
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
475 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
     
May 16, 2006 23:39 |  #17

I think he was way too low for this type of picture. I didn't like his choice on this one. Besides, I thought there were a lot better backgrounds in that area. They didn't move around too much with all that equipment. It is hard to say however since we can't see the final result. :) ...Bob



S H A R P F O C U S (external link)
-Images for the Internet (external link)
D-Rebel XT with 28-135 usm IS (external link) lens (external link)
Canon Chat (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PAS ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
502 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Illinois
     
May 16, 2006 23:52 |  #18

The difference between a good photog and a great photog is they take a different approach / angle to images. A photo wasnt meant to be taken at eye level every time (5'-3" - 6'-2"). If you shoot at the same angle and style as everyone else all the images would look the same and we'd only need one photog per city. haha. Variety and style is whats makes all of our work interesting. If you have time use as much gear as you can but for weddings I know I dont have time to mess with that much gear. Just my thoughts.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/photographypas/ (external link)
http://submit.shutters​tock.com/?ref=66057 (external link)
Catch my "How to Take Lightning Photos" Article and Photos in Shutterbug Magazine coming out soon this Year!!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
May 17, 2006 18:19 as a reply to  @ PAS Photography's post |  #19

PAS Photography wrote:
The difference between a good photog and a great photog is they take a different approach / angle to images. A photo wasnt meant to be taken at eye level every time (5'-3" - 6'-2"). If you shoot at the same angle and style as everyone else all the images would look the same and we'd only need one photog per city. haha. Variety and style is whats makes all of our work interesting. If you have time use as much gear as you can but for weddings I know I dont have time to mess with that much gear. Just my thoughts.

He just wants to be in the shade. The bride can sweat. :confused:

While shooting in the shadow is easier, shooting like this in full sun makes the subject look surreally beautiful. Everything else is lit "normally" and the the bride, correctly lit appears to be shadowless and "out of this world"

Power generator! ROFLMAO


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danedel
Senior Member
Avatar
437 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
May 17, 2006 18:50 as a reply to  @ post 1514584 |  #20

tim wrote:
Sorry to say it, but you completely missed focus... the background is great... the bride's blurry.

lol


My two favorites, 1D MK II + 70-200 2.8 IS Just cant get them apart :lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,524 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Hard work but somebody has to do it.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1747 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.