Barb42 Senior Member  775 posts Joined May 2003 Location: Minnesota More info | May 22, 2006 09:47 | #1 http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon5D/page4.shtml http://www.barbsmithphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AeroSmith Goldmember  More info | May 22, 2006 09:52 | #2 Huh? Looks to me like the 5D has the highest resolution of all the cameras tested in that report. Josh Smith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hauff POTN Wildlife Photographer 2005  737 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Redcliff, Alberta Canada More info | May 22, 2006 09:53 | #3 It seems that the first set of photos were shot in .jpg and compare the cameras default in camera processsing settings. If you took the same samples in raw and processed them yourself the results would be quite different I think. __Bryan__
LOG IN TO REPLY |
imrtun Member  249 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: England, West Sussex More info | May 22, 2006 10:09 | #4 I think the 1ds mkii is clearly better than the 350d, look at the detail in the circular windows at the top of the crop. Though I don't feel it's worth the extra money compared to the 5d, for my personal use anyway.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Canon 20D - Canon 10-22 3.5/5.6 - Canon Speedlite 580EX - Canon 24-70 /2.8 - Canon 17-55/2.8 - Sigma 70-200 /2.8 - Sekonic L-358 - Bowens Esprit Gemini 500/500 - Bowens Travel Pak - 120cm Octobox
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pekka El General Moderator  More info | May 22, 2006 10:11 | #5 1Ds Mark II resolves most detail, 5D is close second. The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davidfig we over look the simplest things  3,275 posts Likes: 85 Joined May 2005 Location: Fremont, California USA More info | May 22, 2006 12:04 | #6 Somethings wrong with the crops. How can all three cameras have similar crops when they are all difference (eg. 1.0, 1.6 crop). Somethings wrong with the test. See how there is blur in the MII. I just don't think it was done right. Maybe I just can't believe it. 5D | 17-40L | Tammy 28-75 2.8 | 28-135 | 50/1.8 | 85/1.8 | Sony A6000 2-Lens Kit | SEL35 1.8 | EF 50 1.8 on NEX as my 75mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
coreypolis Cream of the Crop  6,793 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Mercer Island, WA More info | May 22, 2006 12:07 | #7  Permanent banits just a crappy test. the 1dsII is designed to be sharpened after the fact, while the consumer cams have more built in sharpening as is. who knows what paramaters were used. Photographic Resources
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1207 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
. I don't have a Canon 350D but this test show samples that look better to me than the 5D. I had planned to upgrade to something this year, but perhaps the 30D would be a better choice?? Would some of you equipment gurus take a look?
